The Fellowship Vs Skynet

Originally posted by quanchi112
I take this stuff seriously. You should do the same. It's all about the details.

It''s obvious if I asked you McClane or The Fellowship you'd smash the dvd over your head and start chanting, McClane the man never loses, Ever.

Considering Nemebro just out-detailed you again in here, I don't think you're taking this stuff too seriously. It's now Nemebro 2 Quanchi 0, better improve your game and quick.

LoL, your butt-hurt over pitting Van Zan against McClane and getting your ass handed to you caused you to act out like that in here. I just told you above that carrying butt-hurt across threads is in poor form, so stop.

Wow Robtard, you're gonna make me blush. estahuh

Originally posted by NemeBro
Lol. Yeah.

YouTube video

Check 3:45. Notice that when Gandalf slashes and stabs at the Balrog, it bleeds magma. "No visible injuries" indeed. Also notice himself weathering punches and strikes from the Balrog. While in freefall. For kilometers.

Now check 4:45 of the vid. Notice Gandalf swing his sword. Notice how the Balrog was sent reeling back. Yeah.

His strikes were causing sparks yeah, but not actual wounds. You can see its chest at 4.00 and despite Gandalf stabbing the shit out of it theres nothing there. Again, Gandalf himself says swords are useless against the Balrog. Weathering its punches isn't impressive enough to matter unless you think Gandalf is durable enough to tank swordstrikes from the Terminator.

In pain, not because Gandalf has superstrength suddenly.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Cutting its head off works.

Gandalf isn't capable of that.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I'm sure it was far ****ing superior to the sword of an Uruk-hai. Also, check 2:20 of the vid again. Notice that after the sword disintegrates, the Balrog reels back, in pain.

Its made of fvcking fire. No way is that shit comparable to an actual sword.

Pain? Gandalf didn't do anything. Did his sword get hurt?

Originally posted by NemeBro
Gandalf has proven to be physically the superior foe. And once more, HE FELL KILOMETERS WHILE FIGHTING IN FREE-FALL.

When Gandalf can punch through walls, let me know.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I guess falling kilometers and then fighting with a fire demon as big as a truck isn't superhuman.

I don't know if you noticed, but ****ing Aragorn is superhuman, let alone Gandalf. He can cut through plate as though it were cheese, and block the strike of a troll.

I've seen humans do more in a few movies.

Aragorn is a Numenorean, that is human for him.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Wow Robtard, you're gonna make me blush. estahuh

I'm just stating the truth, man.

Go easy on the guy though, he means well, but he's not very good at this debate stuff. Instead of backing his arguments with logic and movie-feats, he likes to throw out nonsense such as "he has inner strength" and "he'll just find a way".

Originally posted by Nephthys His strikes were causing sparks yeah, but not actual wounds. You can see its chest at 4.00 and despite Gandalf stabbing the shit out of it theres nothing there. Again, Gandalf himself says swords are useless against the Balrog. Weathering its punches isn't impressive enough to matter unless you think Gandalf is durable enough to tank swordstrikes from the Terminator.

In pain, not because Gandalf has superstrength suddenly.

You're out of your mind if you saw that and thought "sparks." Check 3:49, the Balrog is still bleeding out even after Gandalf withdrew his sword for another slash. Then at 3:53 he clearly stabs his sword into the chest of the Balrog. I don't give a shit what Gandalf "said," though actually, he didn't say that. He just said the Balrog was a foe beyond any of their power to defeat. Not that it matters, since his sword clearly cut into it. And Glamdring is a magical sword regardless. And I think Gandalf can destroy the sword with his shield and proceed to cut his head off.

At least try to stay consistent. First, you say Gandalf's sword could not wound the Balrog, now, all of the sudden... It can? And no, Gandalf that time dealt it no wound, and it didn't roar in pain, it reeled back after Gandalf parried its blow. He's been fighting it for days. Gandalf can physically fight the Balrog. He's proven this. Stop denying it.

Gandalf isn't capable of that.

According to the movie he certainly is.

Its made of fvcking fire. No way is that shit comparable to an actual sword.

Pain? Gandalf didn't do anything. Did his sword get hurt?

You're right. It's much better.

It let out a grumble in pain and looked shocked that its sword was destroyed.

When Gandalf can punch through walls, let me know.

Stop being deliberately obtuse. He has shown superhuman attributes. Stop denying them.

I've seen humans do more in a few movies.

Aragorn is a Numenorean, that is human for him.

I've seen humans have a steel girder bend after it fell on their head and wield telephone poles like baseball bats in fiction.

Do you have a point with this?

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering Nemebro just out-detailed you again in here, I don't think you're taking this stuff too seriously. It's now [b]Nemebro 2 Quanchi 0, better improve your game and quick.

LoL, your butt-hurt over pitting Van Zan against McClane and getting your ass handed to you caused you to act out like that in here. I just told you above that carrying butt-hurt across threads is in poor form, so stop. [/B]

The truth stings and hey when I am right I am right.

I can't help but notice Quanchi hasn't actually tried to actually debate me.

How sad.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I can't help but notice Quanchi hasn't actually tried to actually debate me.

How sad.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You backpedaling and abandoning the actual thread in order to cheer on your idol is kinda amusing.

The truth stings and hey when I am right I am right.

It's impossible to backpedaling when I've kept the same argument all along, genius.

You've yet to be right and stop the butt-hurt cross-contamination over the threads.

Do get off my nuts already, you hugging them is distracting you and a reason why Nemebro is spanking your ass. Focus, kid. Focus.

That Terminator is going to be thrown around like a ragdoll.

Originally posted by NemeBro
You're out of your mind if you saw that and thought "sparks." Check 3:49, the Balrog is still bleeding out even after Gandalf withdrew his sword for another slash. Then at 3:53 he clearly stabs his sword into the chest of the Balrog. I don't give a shit what Gandalf "said," though actually, he didn't say that. He just said the Balrog was a foe beyond any of their power to defeat. Not that it matters, since his sword clearly cut into it. And Glamdring is a magical sword regardless. And I think Gandalf can destroy the sword with his shield and proceed to cut his head off.

At least try to stay consistent. First, you say Gandalf's sword could not wound the Balrog, now, all of the sudden... It can? And no, Gandalf that time dealt it no wound, and it didn't roar in pain, it reeled back after Gandalf parried its blow. He's been fighting it for days. Gandalf can physically fight the Balrog. He's proven this. Stop denying it.

Does it matter if its sparks or magma? I paused it as 3.54 and it looks like sparks to me, but whatever, it doesn't matter. If its 'bleeding' then how come we can see its chest 6 seconds later and nothings there. Uh, yeah he did: 'Swords are no more use here.' 1.14 And this is backed up by what I've pointed out, Gandalf stabbing it and not causing any permament damage.

What? How the hell did you get that from what I said. Gandalfs sword clearly causes it pain, not wounds. And seriously, you think Gandalf parried its blow with what is clearly a two-handed swing hard enough to send it reeling backwards? That isn't how swordfighting works Nemebro. The Balrog doesn't even have a weapon, if you look closely you ccan see it try to punch him. Did he parry its fist? Its fist which is clearly on the ground when Gandalf attacks. Look at 4.44 and you can see that what you're saying makes no goddamn sense.

He fought it off-screen, so you have absolutely no proof that he was fighting it blade-to-blade all that time.

Originally posted by NemeBro
According to the movie he certainly is.

Your delusions are not the movie Nemey.

Originally posted by NemeBro
You're right. It's much better.

It let out a grumble in pain and looked shocked that its sword was destroyed.

Because clearly a metal sword is going to react the same way as a magical sword formed out of intangible fire, amright? (hint: no)

Prove it was pain.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Stop being deliberately obtuse. He has shown superhuman attributes. Stop denying them.

I was impressed by his ability to take a punch. He's probably slighty superhuman in that regard. Just not enough to make a difference here.

Although I'll note that:

YouTube video

At 2.38 Gandalf starts bleeding from being telekinetically punched in the face. The blow thats only strong enough to make him pratfall is enough to break his skin. Consistency! Lulz.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I've seen humans have a steel girder bend after it fell on their head and wield telephone poles like baseball bats in fiction.

Do you have a point with this?

Chad isn't human, hes Mexican.

Whats your point with it? You said Aragorn was superhuman, and I said yeah, cuz hes a Numenorean. How does that relate to Gandalf?

Originally posted by Robtard
It's impossible to backpedaling when I've kept the same argument all along, genius.

You've yet to be right and stop the butt-hurt cross-contamination over the threads.

Do get off my nuts already, you hugging them is distracting you and a reason why Nemebro is spanking your ass. Focus, kid. Focus.