Originally posted by quanchi112
Hunting dragons is as high end as you can get. You act as if anything the military does now even compares to the difficulty of hunting dragons with the tech and equipment they had.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Hunting dragons is as high end as you can get. You act as if anything the military does now even compares to the difficulty of hunting dragons with the tech and equipment they had.
Originally posted by RobtardConcession accepted.
YouTube video
Quan, you can't honestly believe that if the circumstances of Reign of Fire occurred in the real world, we would end up in a post apocalyptic wasteland. Quite the opposite actually. We'd drive them extinct so fast they wouldn't have time to breathe fire to counterattack. Human weaponry is very effective and very sophisticated, and while the dragons may pose a threat, they most certainly would not come out victor
Originally posted by Lestov16Not if there were millions and millions of dragons. We'd nuke ourselves probably just like they did in the movie.
Quan, you can't honestly believe that if the circumstances of Reign of Fire occurred in the real world, we would end up in a post apocalyptic wasteland. Quite the opposite actually. We'd drive them extinct so fast they wouldn't have time to breathe fire to counterattack. Human weaponry is very effective and very sophisticated, and while the dragons may pose a threat, they most certainly would not come out victor
Originally posted by Lestov16Yeah, one dragon in which two or so highly trained men died along with the fact this is just one dragon. In the manner they can reproduce and how they would converge on populated areas in the grand scheme of things a meaningless casualty.
A guy shot one down with a harpoon. We'll be fine
Originally posted by Lestov16Yes, a missile would easily destroy one but then again without starving them out due to a lack of of a food source there are a lot more dragons than fighter jets.
They died because they tried shooting it down with a chain net. A missile will have a far different effect
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthIt was stated by the narrator.
I'd doubt it.That many were never shown on screen.
And Van Zan was never shown killing more than he did on screen either.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthHow or more importantly why show a million dragons.....the narrator said so it happened.
I'd doubt it.That many were never shown on screen.
And Van Zan was never shown killing more than he did on screen either.
Originally posted by RobtardI doubt it. Most of the world's population is fodder and we cannot reproduce as quickly as they can.
None was given, chimp. Stop embarrassing yourself, you're now talking as if the Reign of Fire events would happen the way they did.7 billion humans + the military might of the world > millions of dragons.
Easily.... dark swarm in the background other layers of thousands of dragons in like the middle ground layer, and the foreground dragons that we can see clear in foreground... a nice parallax shot or two...job done.
And why not? We buy the narration in Lord of the Rings as it was actually shown.
Onscreen evidence talks...narration BS walks.
But if it was for a second to be a factor here, what part of the narration said that Zan would be able to slaughter them all, and what narration said that the dragons all attacked in unison?
Cause the humans/miltary given enough time would be able to slaughter them like skypigs, taking them down one by one and/or a few or thousand at a time. Hell we could most likely test their bodies, and develop a virus to "wipe them out, all of them."
Anyway: That deals with your strawmannery, now you can get round to accepting that McClane slaughters Van Zan like Van Zan was made of tissue paper.