Denton Van Zan (Reign of Fire) vs. John McClane

Started by Robtard112 pages

Originally posted by Lestov16
McClane got worked by everybody he fought, not just Lihn. Named me one H2H fight he won based purely on fist vs fist (no falling down staircases, no hanging with chains, etc.)

No matter how weak Zan's hits were, at least he showed some proficiency in H2H. McClane has shown [b]none. So even if Zan has to work on Mcclane for a week, he will, because McClane has no way to hit Zan. Zan won't even need to tire himself because McClane is easy to dodge. [/B]

Points to Zan's durability (he got hit in the face, boo-hoo). Points to McClane's durability. Chuckles

Points to Zan's opponent. Points to McClane's opponents. Chuckles

But you can't point to the fight McClane won 😆

Originally posted by Lestov16
But you can't point to the fight McClane won 😆

Ok, enough. I feel bad, sort of.

Confession: I've yet to comment on the match today. I've been copy-pasting your previous pro McClane arguments in here and you've been bashing them.

You've literally been debating against yourself. 🙂

Yeah, I know I was wrong before. That's before I realized how poor McClane was in H2H.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Yeah, I know I was wrong before. That's before I realized how poor McClane was in H2H.

Incorrect. Butthurt at McClane + Quanchi's monkeying via PM = necro thread butt rage.

Look, I'm not like you. I know Saddie PMs you whenever his panties are in a twist, that's only you. Quan didn't PM me. He didn't have to. My desire to spread the truth and right my wrongs led me here today.

Want to continue arguing against yourself? I have plenty more I can copy-paste from you.

So you're going to repost my arguments after I admitted all of my past arguments in this thread were wrong. What is your IQ? Is it in the single-digits, or the negatives?

Protip: The guy who spent a page arguing against himself and didn't realize it shouldn't be questioning another's IQ.

Considering that our arguments back then were identical, not sure what you are trying to prove. Any argument , whether from me, you, or that trolling idiot Saddie which supported Mcclane's win here is wrong. I was biased back then, but not now.

So your IQ? It must be in the decimal points. 1x 10^-50 I'm willing to bet 😆

Originally posted by Lestov16
Considering that our arguments back then were identical, not sure what you are trying to prove. Any argument , whether from me, you, or that trolling idiot Saddie which supported Mcclane's win here is wrong. I was biased back then, but not now.

So your IQ? It must be in the decimal points. 1x 10^-50 I'm willing to bet 😆

I'm not arguing that your pro McClane arguments were wrong, Mr. Strawmanmaker. I'm pointing out that you spent a page arguing against yourself and didn't realize it.

See the protip above.

I see. You lost the thread and now are trying to divert away by babbling on about some irrelevant bullshit? I see you're bringing the classic troll tactics to this one, Robbi.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I see. You lost the thread and now are trying to divert away by babbling on about some irrelevant bullshit? I see you're bringing the classic troll tactics to this one, Robbi.

Considering I've yet to debate a side in this thread today, I have no idea how I lost. You were debating yourself. Understand?

LoL, I know you like to think that you debating yourself here is irrelevant, but it's not. It's probably best if you just stop commenting and let this shame get buried down the forum back into nothing.

Lestov got owned.

Large style... AGAIN... lol

McClane loses /thread

Nah McClane punches that chick Van Zan all up and down the street and sends him crying off like the little grunty alpha girl he is.

(an unpleasant prospect, getting all that dragon dump on your knuckles, I would think)

Therefore McClane clearly wins (as Van Zan cant punch and can't hurt Mcclane at all whatsoever) 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering I've yet to debate a side in this thread today, I have no idea how I lost. You were debating yourself. Understand?

😆 Such a trolling idiot. In a failed attempt to make a fool of me, you've utterly screwed yourself here.

So you have no proof McClane wins here? You say you copy and reposted my old arguments. Thing is, me and you had the same argument, as anybody who wishes to go back in the thread can tell. And it was your argument before mine, because it was the first page when you were talking of about Zan's weak hits.

Thing is that since our arguments were identical, and as you say, I pwned my own arguments, your arguments were equal to my arguments, and thus your arguments have been disproven as well. That means you have no argument yourself. McClane loses like a bytch here ✅

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, I know you like to think that you debating yourself here is irrelevant, but it's not. It's probably best if you just stop commenting and let this shame get buried down the forum back into nothing.

WTF? why do you want this thread to be buried? Because I just proved that you pwned yourself in a horrible attempt at trolling? Yeah you reposted my arguments and I refuted them but YOU AND I HAD THE SAME ARGUMENT, SO ANY REFUTATION OF MY ARGUMENT MEANS YOURS IS REFUTED AS WELL. So yeah, again, your shameless trolling attempt has fooled and you've made an ass of yourself, you trolling idiot.

You got owned, Robbi. See a proctologist for your epic butthurt

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Nah McClane punches that chick Van Zan all up and down the street and sends him crying off like the little grunty alpha girl he is.

(an unpleasant prospect, getting all that dragon dump on your knuckles, I would think)

Therefore McClane clearly wins (as Van Zan cant punch and can't hurt Mcclane at all whatsoever) 🙂

😆

^still loling at the prospect that your trolling opinion matters

^still loling

LOL all you want: Jokes on you. 🙂

And at least LOLing is less annoying than your usual, established and overused wank/cry/wank/cry dynamic.