Denton Van Zan (Reign of Fire) vs. John McClane

Started by Silent Master112 pages
Originally posted by focus4chumps
how could one rage quit suicide more than once?

A member of the game from the Highlander universe could do it.

wouldn't be suicide. just self mutilation. 😖mart:

Originally posted by Lestov16
Too bad McClane isn't a better fighter, like that retarded posts claims.

Bad, ragey english or Freudian slip..? /\

Good to see you know you agreed with a "retarded posts".

McClane wins.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You mean other than the guy in the elevator than he messed up with a couple headbutts, the guy he was fighting on the luggage conveyor belt, the guy whose neck he broke or the main guy in part 5?

DH 1:
Karls Brother,

Karl (who shot him, of course not stopping him in the slightest) 'til he strangled him so he could get on with saving the hostages. Expedient.

DH5: The Russian hood type who ploughed into him with Range Rover (which he shrugged off, of course)

Secret service killer how had a Machine Gun on McClane quick barge, one hook BAM out of it.

The main guy

And everyone in between who he beat h2h the finished off with a crowd pleasing method that could imaginatively involve non weapons like a door, icicle, anything.

'Cause McClane is a dirty natural born killer.

Zan has no chance at all.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Bad, ragey english or Freudian slip..? /\

Good to see you know you agreed with a "retarded posts".

McClane wins.

No, he most certain does not. McClane can't even put down a woman in a fair fight. Zan treated the star of the movie(Batman no less) like common street trash.

And the 1st law of movies: Treat the star like trash get taken out like a b!tchass little punk... like Van Zan.

Like all McClane's enemies keep doing to him, guaranteeing their later (if not immediate) deadness..

Re: Ninja Chick

He did actually. KO'd her.

You just want to piss on every victory McClane had via misrepresentation.

She cheap shotted him through a window causing him to fall a story or two. (Couldnt hurt him, of course)

He KO'd a ninjachick who tanked a car crashing into her with no damage, Like McClane does. Twas a fair fight.

She would have outright killed slow, weak, slappy, unfit grunter/poser Van Zan. (Assuming he couldn't commit suicide first, of course, because her tacticry and ability to beat him to every punch by three complete weeks would have induced suicide rage in him)

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
And the 1st law of movies: Treat the star like trash get taken out like a b!tchass little punk... like Van Zan.

Like all McClane's enemies keep doing to him, guaranteeing their later (if not immediate) deadness..

Re: Ninja Chick

He did actually. KO'd her.

You just want to piss on every victory McClane had via misrepresentation.

She cheap shotted him through a window causing him to fall a story or two. (Couldnt hurt him, of course)

He KO'd a ninjachick who tanked a car crashing into her with no damage, Like McClane does. Twas a fair fight.

She would have outright killed slow, weak, slappy, unfit grunter/poser Van Zan. (Assuming he couldn't commit suicide first, of course, because her tacticry and ability to beat him to every punch by three complete weeks would have induced suicide rage in him)

His death was heroic. If you feel the makers were going for a weak or punk ass death you're wrong. This is why you are so hard to debate against. You just make things up in your head. It's like talking to a wall.

Her turning around and him blasting her isn't fair. You might think it was but alas not the case.

You also still keep speculating and displaying an utter lack of comprehension of simple words.

Zan wins. Greater portrayal than punching bag, McClane.

Why does Zan's pathetic hth showing get him the win?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why does Zan's pathetic hth showing get him the win?
So treating the star of the film like a nonthreat is a pathetic showing ?

"Star of the film" doesn't make a character some H2H badass by default as you seem to think. Van Zan beat up an average/untrained fighter. This is all you have here.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Star of the film" doesn't make a character some H2H badass by default as you seem to think. Van Zan beat up an average/untrained fighter. This is all you have here.
He according to you not only was a survivor you feel he had the right plan against the dragons along with his physique, toughness, and overall formidability makes this a very impressive showing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So treating the star of the film like a nonthreat is a pathetic showing ?

Being the star of a film isn't a hth feat.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Being the star of a film isn't a hth feat.
You really need to watch the movie.

I have and my point stands.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He according to you not only was a survivor you feel he had the right plan against the dragons along with his physique, toughness, and overall formidability makes this a very impressive showing.

He was a survivor, along with other people, some of them little children; that isn't a H2H feat.

He did have the right plan; that isn't a H2H feat.

Your man crush on Bale's physique isn't a H2H feat.

He was fairly tough, but that isn't a H2H feat in of itself.

How was he formidable? He showed base level H2H fighting skills.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Guy gets it done in a die hard movie. This isn't a die hard movie. It's like saying hey the hero wins(we all know the hero will win at the end of the day). These threads allow the heroes to die and don't take place in their own personal story.
Lol, you're an idiot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
His death was heroic. If you feel the makers were going for a weak or punk ass death you're wrong. This is why you are so hard to debate against. You just make things up in your head. It's like talking to a wall.

Her turning around and him blasting her isn't fair. You might think it was but alas not the case.

You also still keep speculating and displaying an utter lack of comprehension of simple words.

Zan wins. Greater portrayal than punching bag, McClane.

Wow.. Incorrect in every sentence. Quite an achievement.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I have and my point stands.
If you think the filmmakers went for the Quinn's a weak girly man then you are a liar.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
Lol, you're an idiot.
The whole he wins because he's a hero theory is moronic indeed, fatso.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Wow.. Incorrect in every sentence. Quite an achievement.
You're just upset Zan wins. Anger and frustration as clouded your judgment.