Originally posted by carver9
Pr...I'm not trying to troll.Why can't I believe Gladiator is stronger than anyone (minus Hulk) here when overall, he has the fts?
A) Because he doesn't.
B) I wasn't talking about Gladiator.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
The first part of your post doesn't mesh well with the second part.
ha.
Originally posted by SquallX
And lifting a Universe makes no sense, so Hercules lifting a Universe is also a non-feat.See, i can nitpick at you're bullshits too.
the difference is that we know superman doesn't have infinite strength. we don't know that Hercules doesn't have the capacity to lift the whole universe.
Originally posted by JakeTheBankI never thought feats decided who was stronger but while saying that I think it's obvious Superman is stronger than Thor and Hercules. Not as wide as the gap between him and WW but still. I think how these characters match up against their peers is the best indicator of strength.
Because using quantifiable feats, Superman's are superior?
Originally posted by SquallX
Sometime you're cool Carver, but most of the times i hate you're double standards.So here's a question for you?
Who's Stronger Hulk or Wolverine. I mean in WWH, the Hulk was bashing the shit out Logan, and he couldn't even ko'd him, but his mere footstep almost sink the Eastern sea board.
Lol... I'm always cool.
Wolverine has high end durability (healing factor and adamantium skull) and he took more punches than almost anyone during the WWH arc minus Sentry.
Why can't you answer my question? You know what I'm going to say next huh?
Originally posted by wildernesss
the difference is that we know superman doesn't have infinite strength. we don't know that Hercules doesn't have the capacity to lift the whole universe.
Come the hell on, man. 😬
How you're somehow divorcing those two feats and clinging on to the idea that Herc's somehow makes more sense is beyond me.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never thought feats decided who was stronger but while saying that I think it's obvious Superman is stronger than Thor and Hercules. Not as wide as the gap between him and WW but still. I think how these characters match up against their peers is the best indicator of strength.
Pretty much. I think Superman is a tad bit stronger than Thor as well. If they were in an arm wrestling contest, it would take hrs for Supes to win "but he would win". Hercules is questionable imo. His strength varies.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Come the hell on, man. 😬How you're somehow divorcing those two feats and clinging on to the idea that Herc's somehow makes more sense is beyond me.
there are degrees in everything, even in ridiculous feats. however, there is a difference between ridiculous and impossible. superman having "infinite strength" breaks the barrier between the ridiculous & the impossible. superman towing planets & hercules lifting the universe are ridiculous, BUT there those feats are, on panel, observable & with no tricks. the superman "infinite strength" shared 50/50 lift is not only ridiculous but also convoluted, riddled with intellectual trickery, mathematically impossible, & impossible since superman does not have infinite strength.
Originally posted by carver9
I honestly believe he is the strongest.I knew who you were talking about and I'm not trying to troll.
You'd need to prove it. On this list he's maybe half way. top third at best. he still lags behind several people based on feats.
Originally posted by carver9
Dam*, why would you ruin that for me Jake? FU 😉
So you admit that you lied? profiled.
Originally posted by -Pr-
You'd need to prove it. On this list he's maybe half way. top third at best. he still lags behind several people based on feats.So you admit that you lied? profiled.
I have proven this so many times. I can't believe I haven't warped you all minds yet with all the times I posted his fts. We might just need to just call this even Pr.
Lol...I got the scan from Sundip, I didn't know he would post a dream. Jake could have kept that a secret.
If the sum total of the universe has no definable weight, why isn't it just as unquantifiable as Superman lifting a book weighing "Infinity" or the Spectre who weighs "Eternity"? I don't think you can say that Superman's two instances are "impossible" and not say the same thing about Hercules lifting the sum total weight of the Universe.
Originally posted by carver9
I have proven this so many times. I can't believe I haven't warped you all minds yet with all the times I posted his fts. We might just need to just call this even Pr.Lol...I got the scan from Sundip, I didn't know he would post a dream. Jake could have kept that a secret.
you haven't proven anything, though. You post feats that aren't valid because they're either an alternate universe or misrepresented. To prove something, you need PROOF.
And you would have kept up the illusion. It wouldn't have mattered anyway; I've read Hulk.
Originally posted by Mr.Mxyzptlk
If the sum total of the universe has no definable weight, why isn't it just as unquantifiable as Superman lifting a book weighing "Infinity" or the Spectre who weighs "Eternity"? I don't think you can say that Superman's two instances are "impossible" and not say the same thing about Hercules lifting the sum total weight of the Universe.
^ Common sense.
Sadly, it isn't that common.