Originally posted by Korto VosThe point is he allowed the fireball all the way down the tower to even get to him. That means he waits for Voldemort's first attack before he even thinks about attacking him. It's in character. I can beat you at your own game.
After the failed fireball, when Gandalf had enough of Saruman's bullsh1t, he shatters the staff 500 feet (150 meters) on top of a tower on a whim without any resistance from Saruman.
He didn't maintain control Dumbledore took the control so when it came back Voldemort easily dissipated it. I don't think that fireball even comes close in comparison to Fiendfyre.
It was Voldemort's own Fiendfyre that Dumbledore sent back; it wasn't a new spell that he countered, but a spell of his own that he still maintained some control. Secondly, and more importantly, Gandalf wasn't bothering trying to dissipate the fireball. He has a kick@ss Shield that would handily block it for him. [/B]
This isn't pis. It's canon and being objective means you don't pick and choose what counts it all does. He used an ability to defeat Gandalf while his shield did nothing. Great job, Gandy. The other points have no relevance to these films.
Once again, you fail to realize obvious PIS/CIS. The Bakshi film adaptation and book both depict a stalemate. This on top of the fact that the Witch King was powered by Sauron during the Battle of Pelennor Fields. Secondly, Gandalf the Grey, after escaping Orthanc in FOTR, goes to Weathertop and fights all 9 Nazgul simultaneously to a draw (thereby proving that sequence as PIS/CIS). Third, Gandalf doesn't "stupidly sit back"; he had his Shield activated. [/B]
Harry also has methods gandalf doesn't. Harry also had a lot of help in defeating Voldemort. Voldemort was greater than Harry hands down in a forum fight and in the movie the hero wins at the end. I don't pick and choose I accept what happens.
Actually, Harry does rather well blocking Voldemort's spells throughout the entire battle scene.Secondly, if you're going to rationalize and argue that, you'll be hypocritically ignoring reasoning for why that scene was obvious PIS/CIS. [/B]