srankmissingnin
VP of Comic Knowledge
Originally posted by peejayd
* you're clearly missing it, srank... the fact is, you cannot nullify the positive by creating a negative... and given the facts of how the history of the Phoenix was written, you cannot deny that the host [b]can control the PF... okay, the host went insane, well have you considered what went wrong? what triggered the insanity? the PF and the host cannot go insane on their own... you know the Dark Phoenix saga, right? did the PF went insane out of nowhere? or did something triggered for its insanity? do the math...* well, for starters, Hope is also not an avatar of the Phoenix... Cable stated that Hope is the Phoenix... just like Jean Grey... and if Hope wasn't such a brat, Rachel and even Emma could've molded her to be a good psychic (or host for the PF) in no time...
* get real? i was actually ranting a defense on what Cyclops' drive is... on why he's uber-confident about the PF's positive effects on mutant population... on why he's uber-confident that this time around, they'll "write a happy ending"... getting real is like you're actually getting out of the comics' universe... there's practically nothing real in comics... so a 14-year-old (or 16) controlling the PF is not unreal, srank... get back in the comic universe... oh, Hope's not just the Phoenix, she's also the Mutant Messiah... and if the writers won't mess this up, that title would be fulfilled...
* okay, i actually facepalmed on the Wolverine part... so you genuinely believed that Logan is the only freakin' character that can pull the trigger, which is hypocrisy if you remember Schism... Logan's gotten soft nowadays with his "children shoud not fight/kill" mentality... or, he's feeling the dose of his own medicine by preaching his mentality while he's doing the dirty work himself, and that's clear outright hypocrisy... in character? in his current stature, even Cyclops has the balls to do it, think about it... Scott is willing to take the risks nowadays, while Logan can't... Scott already has the burden of seeing his own wife (2 wives, to be exact) and son die in front of him... it's a painful experience, but Scott can take it (coldheartedly speaking)... but to say that Logan is the only choice? it's stupid...
* anyway, the whole AvX war is also stupid... they could've combined all of their plans and strategies without fighting each other... the writers only raised the character's ego-bars and let them get it all on... [/B]
When the positive is that maybe the Phoenix will usher in a new dawn of the mutant race, and the negative is that it will destroy all of existence, I don't really need to do anything to negate the positives because the negative already so complete dwarfs any positive effect.
Jean isn't the only Dark Phoenix, nor is the the Dark Phoenix Saga the only time that the Dark Phoenix persona had control over Jean. The Dark Phoenix is merely one side of the Phoenix Force that represents the inherent conflict created from the duality in being a cosmic force of both Destruction and Rebirth. It's not insane, it's merely a force of nature. The Dark Phoenix is a real concern for all of the Phoenix hosts... it's the reason why the Shi'ar have task forces dedicated to whipping out hosts and their entire extended family to prevent anyone who could possibly become the Phoenix.
Because Cable speaks with the same authority as an abstract cosmic being? facepalm
Cable said that Hope is the Phoenix, and she is, she is an Avatar of the Phoenix. Death stated that Jean Grey was the Phoenix and expressly mentioned that she not merely another host or avatar of the force. There is no equity or common ground between those two declarations. Outside of a potential plot shield being the alleged "Mutant Messiah" is really inconsequential to the characters involved in this event. It's not some concert fact or anything, it's just something the took to calling her because by happenstance she happened to be the first mutant born post M-Day and she can create activate new mutants. None of the characters in this event read press releases from Joe Q, so don't equate what you know and what has been said on the internet with what the actual characters know about Hope.
Clearly you have no concept of the motivations or personalities of these characters, nor do you seem to have any memory of X-Men history. Wolverine didn't get "soft", and boiling down Schism to "children should not fight/kill" mentality is an extreme over simplification of the real issue. Frankly it has more to do with an oversight in the leadership of the X-Men then it does with children fighting, and Schism is not the first time Wolverine has brought up the issue. The real issue is that Cyclops doesn't acknowledge that most of the students are not cut out for field duty. Wolverine has expressed his displeasure in having in having green mutants out in the field several times, and when other characters have tried to justify it by saying that the originally X-Men roster were all teenagers, he pointed out that they were all hand picked by Xavier for the express purpose of creating the X-Men... which is a far cry from the open door, all mutants are welcome to fight on the front lines police Cyclops has implemented. The fact is that many of the students, the vast majority of them in fact, are not cut out to be X-Men and instead of being a leader and giving Hope and the Five Lights an order Cyclops gave children the authority to make a decision that none of they were emotionally more mentally qualified to make... and then pretended like the decision mattered. The reality is that Wolverine likely wouldn't have a problem with Hope being in combat, he knows she was trained by Cable and is capable, it's the rest of the students he is concerned about, and know he is merely toeing a hardline to set an example, rather than have to justify exceptions to the rules. None of that has any real baring on the fact that Wolverine is a killer... and aside from a small handful of other characters he is the only person in this event that it would be in character for him to kill a child for the greater good.