Originally posted by dadudemonPaul will never pair with Romney. What the **** is Romney going to change? Nothing but a goldman sachs cock sucker like Obama. They're like 99% identical.
To me, it seems like a way to get some liberal votes (some of the democratic voters and moderates). It also would get much of Paul's votes (despite the numbers, Paul still got 10% of votes).Of the candidates, Ron Paul seems the best choice to strengthen Romney's base and voter "span". It would be the GOP's best chance against Obama. Romney can go up against Obama in the moderate category, but he is lacking in some socially conservative areas (abortion) and liberal social areas (lol...Ron Paul is so not a single thing). With Newt or Santorum, he gets a more conservative flavor but does not really broaden his voter base.
If its Romney vs Obama, Obama already won.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
6,200 in chico.
sure, and he took about 18 000 votes in Cook County
meaning that, for every person that comes to his rally, 3 vote for him.
Meaning, his UCLA showing may indicate he gets 30 000 votes in that county, this number is less than the total number of students and staff at UCLA alone.
so, sure, he has a small number of people willing to come out to his rallies, whereas Romney doesn't, but people will actually vote for him.
Paul getting 10 000 people, in California (a state that should be favorable to him), at a university (a setting that should be favorable to him), is meaningless, unless we are talking about the psychology and motivation of his devotees.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
Good thing this isnt soley about winning. "Spreading brushfires of liberty in the minds of people". It's about educating the masses. It's a revolution. You'd have to be a ****ing brainwashed government loving moron to not want to be apart of being free.
you don't see how this type of attitude actually may prevent you from spreading anything? deliberate mocking, for no reason, of the very people you are trying to spread your message to?
Its like, you have this burning need to have people validate your ideas, but get so defensive at the slightest disagreement. I've seen you insult people for saying they only disagree with 1/4 of Paul's positions.
Also dominated the california straw poll. stoned
But to be honest though, inimalist, I really dont care what this tiny handful of.... what? 5 people? Yeah, I really dont care what you guys think in here or what your votes, if you are even voting, go towards. I made this decision a while ago almost instantly after seeing most of the responses from people here. You guys are a bunch of jokes. I'm apart of many forums because I like to converse, and this is the only forum that I find to be very pathetic when it comes to discussing something serious. The attitude I receive from the get go.
I only post in here for people who actually care to see. As long as it exists somewhere in here, thats fine by me. **** what you guys think.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
Wonder why.
he has a rabid fan base that pay a huge amount of attention to these things in the way supporters of other candidates don't?
his followers tend to be young and more connected with these types of polling than would supporters of other candidates?
his supporters are more loyal and activist, therefore more willing to participate in these things, compared to the other candidates?
or, sorry, I mean, the only possible answer is a vast Republican/MSM/blahblahblah conspiracy!!!!
Originally posted by Mairuzu
Has anyone even taken the time to watch all the videos of what I, and many others, claim to be fraud?
just so I understand your point: your argument is that, in fact, Ron Paul is receiving more votes than the other candidates, they are simply being suppressed by a large conspiracy that is determined to not have Paul win?
Originally posted by Mairuzu
You haven't watched the videos have you? Because your question makes me assume you haven't.
Is one of the videos titled: "Mairuzu clarifies his position about a vast conspiracy against Ron Paul for inimalist?"
Because otherwise a really simple "yes that is accurate" or "no, I don't believe that" is all I'm looking for...
EDIT: To answer you, in hopes you will return the favor, no I haven't watched the videos. If you suggested to me that they show unequivocal evidence that there is a conspiracy to suppress Ron Paul voters, then I would be interested, but really, I'm more interested in knowing what your opinion is, so I don't misrepresent you.
Originally posted by Mairuzu
The **** are you talking about now? Another attempt at humor? Lol
"Apart" refers to breaking something into pieces. You wanted to say, "I'm a part", as in, you belong to, rather than being broken off from, the various forum communities you participate in. No biggie, it just changes the meaning of your sentence into the exact opposite of what you wanted to say.
For someone so quick to insult my intelligence in the name of the great Dr. Paul... I'm sure grammar isn't a major part of the revolution though, right?
I suggest you watch the videos before you waste your time responding to anything else.
You seem to have OCD when it comes to slight grammatical errors and typos. Maybe if you focused that much attention to something more productive we could actually get a decent conversation going. stoned
Then again its all you have going for you.
How about this:
If I were to assume, from this point on, that you believe there is a vast and top-down orchestrated conspiracy to literally defraud Paul out of the Republican nomination, would I be wrong?
The reason it is irrelevant, at least for this point, if I watch the videos or not, is that they wont tell me your opinion. I will see them and draw my own conclusions, and will still need to ask you if you think there is a deliberate conspiracy against Paul. I already know my opinion on this matter and unless, as I said above, the videos provide unequivocal evidence of a conspiracy, it is unlikely to change. If you feel they do, that, by inference, answers the question I asked in the first place.
But seriously, I'm asking you to clarify a point you are making on a discussion forum, and you are telling me to go find it myself. Do you think this is a strong tactic that moves a conversation forward?
Originally posted by Mairuzu
You seem to have OCD when it comes to slight grammatical errors and typos. Maybe if you focused that much attention to something more productive we could actually get a decent conversation going. stoned
A decent conversation where you steadfastly refuse to clarify your position? Call me whatever names you want, at least I can produce clear, grammatically correct, points.
Originally posted by inimalist
ok, Mairuzu, you mentioned Chicago before and Paul's rally with 6200 people in attendance:[b]Do you think Paul received more votes in Cook County than did Romney or Santorum?
[/B]
Look who made the mistake this time. I said Chico. Chico california. It was two days ago bruh
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Those videos have a strange effect on me, and I think they are dangerous. I lost conciseness half way through the first one.
So you admit you've only watched 1 video? Plenty of people seem to have a different response to you. Not sure what the problem is. Theres even a video of the entire missouri event. Its in that same list.