Originally posted by OneDumbG0
crackersThe following scan is not on-panel proof that Doomsday fights with superspeed movements making him a blur to onlookers. This scan is on-panel proof that Superman can tackle Doomsday with flight at speeds that make them blurs. It's a traveling speed feat. And it's Superman's traveling speed feat:
You make a good point. But that rebuttal doesn't destroy everything.
Doomsday never appeared as a blur on-panel to my recollection. Nobody referred to him as a blur either (aside from when he was tackled at superspeeds by a flying Superman). I don't disagree he's got speed that complements his power enough such that it makes it extraordinarily hard for superspeedsters to fight him. But that's more a testament to his sheer power and the deadly combination that sheer power presents when coupled with surprising speed (not superspeedster speed).And the exact same thing could be said of the Hulk. And it has. On-panel. Moreover, it's been reinforced by measurable speed feats. Not just character statements.
Hulk is not a true speedster. No one with grade A speed has ever complained that he's too fast. Writer's intentions is one thing but Superman alone proves that DD has superspeed on his level or above his level. Hulk doesn't have that.
Has anyone of grade A super speed ever complain of Hulk's speed and be shown to not even see them move? Has Hulk hit 5 or more people simultaneously (including someone of Superman's speed level)? Note: That is a very legit high level speed feat. Has anyone claimed that Hulk was faster than the fastest being in Marvel?
If the writer was indeed trying to portray DD as being as fast as Superman (or faster) in battle speed then you are saying that he did a shitty job trying to show it. If so, then how could he have shown it?
Actually its astronomically more rucking fetarded to believe that DD wasn't being portrayed as a superspeedster in DOS. Because everyone who read it initially got that impression. Do a poll (Did you believe DD was a superspeedster after you first read DOS?) and you will see clearly.
You are a decent debater, but here you are clearly wrong. And I'm afraid you don't have the humility to admit it if you saw it. And that's worst than almost anything in life (being too proud).
