Originally posted by zopzop
A) He's admitted to having superiors
B) He has at least ONE peer : GEB
C) He was almost overthrown by Swamp Thing with Elemental Congress ampThere's probably more but that's enough for now.
Who are his superiors?
Having peers doesn't make him less powerful.
How does the swamp thing, thing, make him look bad?
Originally posted by -Pr-
Who are his superiors?
Having peers doesn't make him less powerful.
How does the swamp thing, thing, make him look bad?
A) I don't know who they are (notice it's multiple) he mentioned them to Lucifer. I forgot what issue it was from, but a forum member had posted the scan.
B) Yes, because it proves he's not the Supreme Being.
C) Because it shows he can be overthrown by his own creation if they play their cards right. Hence he's weaksauce.
Originally posted by zopzop
A) I don't know who they are (notice it's multiple) he mentioned them to Lucifer. I forgot what issue it was from, but a forum member had posted the scan.B) Yes, because it proves he's not the Supreme Being.
C) Because it shows he can be overthrown by his own creation if they play their cards right. Hence he's weaksauce.
a) I'll have to have a look
b) He's the supreme being of creation, though, and still as powerful as the name implies.
c) I don't see how making others powerful makes him weak.
It's not like anyone in this thread is going to replicate Swamp Thing's feat.
Originally posted by -Pr-
a) I'll have to have a look
b) He's the supreme being of creation, though, and still as powerful as the name implies.
c) I don't see how making others powerful makes him weak.It's not like anyone in this thread is going to replicate Swamp Thing's feat.
A) I'll look too. I couldn't believe it when I saw it myself.
B) No he's not. If he has a peer that he didn't create and is just as powerful as he is, by definite he can't be the Supreme Being
C) Because it shows that it's possible to overthrow him if you play your cards right.
Originally posted by zopzop
A) I'll look too. I couldn't believe it when I saw it myself.
B) No he's not. If he has a peer that he didn't create and is just as powerful as he is, by definite he can't be the Supreme Being
C) Because it shows that it's possible to overthrow him if you play your cards right.
b) He's the supreme being of creation. GEB is outside of creation. He's still "god", when it comes down to it.
c) Through a heavily convoluted system that's almost impossible to exploit. And he wasn't overthrown, iirc.
Either way, agree or not, how are these guys killing Michael?
Originally posted by -Pr-
b) He's the supreme being of creation. GEB is outside of creation. He's still "god", when it comes down to it.
c) Through a heavily convoluted system that's almost impossible to exploit. And he wasn't overthrown, iirc.Either way, agree or not, how are these guys killing Michael?
B) Hence he can't be the Supreme Being. He has a peer that's in competition with him. The fight ended in 'at best a stalemate'.
C) He wasn't but he could have been. Hence proving even in his own creation, he's not Supreme.
Originally posted by zopzop
B) Hence he can't be the Supreme Being. He has a peer that's in competition with him. The fight ended in 'at best a stalemate'.C) He wasn't but he could have been. Hence proving even in his own creation, he's not Supreme.
He's the supreme being when it comes to his own creation. GEB wasn't his creation.
Just because he gave them the power to potentiall overthrow him doesn't mean he couldn't take it away if he wanted to.
Like I said though, none of this is relevant, and we'd just be going back and forth. The question here is Michael 😛