Originally posted by DARTH POWER
At base strength Ruffalo Hulk starts out stronger (seemingly). But Bana Hulk increases strength too quickly. Plus there's the proven healing factor. And the speed. So Bana Hulk is still superior by a fair bit.
I disagree with all of your other points but I think you may be right on this one.
I see this shit tomorrow! I am TIRED OF TEH WAITINGZ! 😠 😠 😠
Originally posted by golem370
When Abom had him pinned against the wall he couldn't break free he saw Betty and got madder and showed imo a strength increase being able to grab aboms arms from against his neck even Abom seemed alittle suprised that he was being overpowered.
Yeah but even if your right, where was the strength increase the rest of the fight?
It's obviously not a consistent power that can be relied upon. Whilst Bana Hulk's strength increase is larger, more consistent and more reliable.
Norton Hulk was reluctant to attack anything, he was characterised by fear and distrust of his powers.
Bana Hulk was initially scared but he admitted he enjoyed the feeling immensely. That might have played a significant part in their relative performances against the military.
Also, Norton Banner though denying any presence during the Hulk moments was show to be (at least) misremembering things, when Liv's Betty said that she felt Hulk both recognised and responded to her.
Basically Norton was too busy showing just how much he didn't want to be The Hulk. He was in denial of his true capacity to engage with it, whereas Bana got over that fear quite quickly and came to enjoy and revel in it.
Originally posted by KingD19
They are technically the same HUlk, but Ruffalo is a lot more powerful going by feats, and a lot more willing to fight.
Yeah that's what I mean. Nobody's talking about Hulk's feats in The Avengers, like when he broke that Chitauri fish in half (right after his transformation). They're just talking about his limits in 08', which have been rendered moot since Hulk was less experienced then.