Sure Lesty, sure. 🙄
Apart from McClane:
*Having actual movie feats,
*Staying alive through the run, enduring all he did without dying once
*Having feats that transcend physical likelihood in reality,
*Having superior Durability
*Having superior minutes-onscreen-to-action/killing-time ratio
*Having superior feats of fortune
*Not relying on CTU for constant support
*Still making movies
*Being likely to win any and all drinking contests whilst going on to kill entire gangs of badguys with massive hangover
*Not getting captured for 20 months like a klutz
*Not having had to be a dirty skaghead
*Being the one who Bauer tries so hard to emulate, despite aforementioned reliance on CTU, having died etc etc
*Being more entertaining pound-for-pound and a more likeable character
Your butthurt and illogical self claims of win are a mark of the gigafathoms of depth of your butthurt and inability to let go after you've been proved wrong so hard.
Cheap baseless insults and putting your fingers in your ears to escape reality is all you have. Sad. So sad. 🙁
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Sure Lesty, sure. 🙄Apart from McClane:
*Having actual movie feats,
*Staying alive through the run, enduring all he did without dying once
*Having feats that transcend physical likelihood in reality,
*Having superior Durability
*Having superior minutes-onscreen-to-action/killing-time ratio
*Having superior feats of fortune
*Not relying on CTU for constant support
*Still making movies
*Being likely to win any and all drinking contests whilst going on to kill entire gangs of badguys with massive hangover
*Not getting captured for 20 months like a klutz
*Not having had to be a dirty skaghead
*Being the one who Bauer tries so hard to emulate, despite aforementioned reliance on CTU, having died etc etc
*Being more entertaining pound-for-pound and a more likeable character
If this is the core of your argument then I was correct in completely disregarding your pathetic, baseless, idiotic, and foolish opinion 😆
Oh cause that matters so much to anyone reading through this thread, and realises whats what... lol
McClane won based on evidence, reason and logic. No way can you cheapen or pervert that based on some self aggrandising non appropriate bragging.false claims of some imagined victory...cause that just shows you to be the totally butthurt fanboy that you are.
I'm done trying to argue this point with you. You obviously have the mental capacity of a 2-week premature toddler with Dementia since you can not seem to comprehend simple black-and-white logic and reasoning, and your validation is not required to show that Bauer wins when the objective evidence proves it beyond a doubt.
Do you know what you remind me of? You're like one of those stupid Fundamentalists who ignores evolution despite the fact that it's irrefutable.
You're obviously blind in your idiocy and I don't feel like wasting any more time poisoning my own brain cells by responding to your nonsensical garbage. If you want to live in your illogical fantasy world where facts don't matter, be my guest. Just note that it is the only location where your opinion actually bears any truth whatsoever.
I'm Outtie 😉
Originally posted by omgchos
Did they make a 24 movie?
There's a made-for-tv movie.
Re: Jack Bauer vs John McClane
Originally posted by Lestov16Could go either way. Jack is the more skilled fighter, but McClane has unreal damage soak.
1. H2H fight in a 12x12 ft steel cage ring
2. Gunfight in Palisades mall. Both get a Beretta with 10 clipsMcClane.
3. Melee fight in the Initech office buildingLol, McClane.
4. Who is the better counterterrorist?Jack Bauer, not even close.