John McClane vs Bane

Uuuuuummmmmm you mean the fight afterwhich which McClane was alive and his opponent (along with his 15 of his opponents highly trained friends) were killed and McClane went on to save the day..?

Hmmmmmmm.

Yep, "afterwhich", which means we are talking purely about the H2H fight in which McClane got the manshit beat out of him, not irrelevant stuff that happened after

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Unlikely , given McClane's proven durability.

How would've Bane faired against the Ninja chick in Live Free or Die Hard?

Originally posted by NemeBro
It doesn't really matter considering McClane is too weak and too poor a fighter to be able to even begin resisting Bane.

👆

It's pretty obvious who's superior when you have to gimp McClane by taking away his gun AND knowledge.

Well he was "too poor" a fighter to beat all his opponents onscreen too....yet he killed them all and went for a beer.

Purely flair based and poncey slappy slappy crap doesnt really work.
That was why Riggs lost to McClane.

Its the effective and often dirty stuff that works. Straight from A to B sorta shit.

Originally posted by Psychotron
It's pretty obvious who's superior when you have to gimp McClane by taking away his gun AND knowledge.

Originally posted by Mindset
McClane loses, and frankly, you're an idiot if you disagree.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well he was "too poor" a fighter to beat all his opponents onscreen too....yet he killed them all and went for a beer.

He killed them via non-H2H means, so it's irrelevant

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Purely flair based and poncey slappy slappy crap doesnt really work.
That was why Riggs lost to McClane.

Wait a second, are you saying McClane is immune to H2H? 😆

Originally posted by Psychotron
It's pretty obvious who's superior when you have to gimp McClane by taking away his gun AND knowledge.

Of course he doesn't have a gun. It's a H2H fight........

If McClane had a weapon (doesn't have to be a gun....a knife would do) or knew banes mask weakness he would win but just a straight up fight Bane would rape him.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well he was "too poor" a fighter to beat all his opponents onscreen too....yet he killed them all and went for a beer.

Purely flair based and poncey slappy slappy crap doesnt really work.
That was why Riggs lost to McClane.

Its the effective and often dirty stuff that works. Straight from A to B sorta shit.

Bane just punches McClane's face over and over again.

No, the mythical "McClane Factor" will come in and make the roof collapse on Bane at the last second, since that's the only way McClane will get a win here 😆

So even though this fight takes place in the same scenario as Die Hard 1.

McClane doesn't have all the tools at his disposal as he had in the film?

He has to take on Bane in the same situation as Batman did in TDKRs after many rewrites?

I call shenanigans.

Damn you ninjak!

But no, if Bane headed the Nakatomi mercs, McClane would not have survived. For one thing, Bane isn't stupid enough to not conduct a patdown

The terrorists arrived after the party.

McClane shoots Bane in the freakin head!

Bane didn't foresee a supercop.

Only thing getting freaked is McClane's spine when Bane breaks it

Good to see that for McClane to lose he needs to be gimped of his resources and knowledge.

Here's an idea for another like fight, Superman Vs Bane, cept Superman has been totally drained of his powers. Go!

Nah, even if he had his resources and knowledge of DH1, he still is going to get freaked by Bane. Bane is on a completely different level than Hans.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Who said anything about flair based and poncey slappy slappy crap?

Bane just punches McClane's face over and over again.

Something that we have seen done to McClane over and over again.

And McClane endures, survives and kills the bad guy over and over again.