srankmissingnin
VP of Comic Knowledge
Originally posted by The Scenario
Hmm. This reminded me of something.We have seen Aku being attacked by weapons other than Jack's sword, and he's shown either outright immunity, absorption, or a healing factor. When Jack sword touches him it doesn't heal, and actively burns away parts of Aku. Not to mention the various magic stuff the sword has cut through, like Demongo's essence binding or the gauntlets of a Titan. Thoughts on this vs. Wolverine?
Jack's sword was made with the solo purpose of destroying Aku, so it's not really surprising that it can. It was made to destroy evil, can't be used for evil purposes and can't harm the innocent, I don't see it having any effect on Wolverine greater than that of a normal sword. The primary advantage it will bring Jack is that Wolverine won't be able to cut clean through it on a block or parry.
Originally posted by The Scenario
Also, this: http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb380/scenario3/Screenshots/SJgoldswimming.pngJack swimming while holding a gold helmet as large as he is. I think it's a pretty good answer to the piano feat even if Jack didn't quite make it all the way to the surface.
Impressive. I would think that's at least 400lbs?
Originally posted by The Scenario
You sure? From the feats posted, Jack has matched nearly all of them. Wolverine dodges machinegun fire, Jack dodges machinegun fire, and blocks it occasionally. Wolverine deflects a missile after it's been fired, Jack has cut three missiles out of the air at once, kicked two into another opponent, and dodged the rest, all after they've been fired. Jack also has the bounty hunter water drop feat. From what I have seen in this thread, Jack has an answer or an equivalent to all of the feats Blight and you have provided, with one exception: the Orphan Maker projectile, which someone said wasn't a bullet so I don't know. Perhaps another missile.
Quite positive. It's not an overwhelming or insurmountable advantage, but it is an advantage. The logistics behind Wolverine's feats are more impressive on the whole.
Who said Orphan Maker's gun doesn't fire bullets? 😕
Originally posted by The Scenario
ON THE ULTRA-BOTS: I don't really care about them, as all they really have is the adamantium statement, but I do think you're selling them a bit short. I don't think it's unreasonable for the chaingun-bot's bullets to also be adamantium, for example. The robot arm was made by the same scientist that made specifically to fight them, it's again not unreasonable for it to be able to harm them on its own. They're a good enough battle.
I don't think I'm selling them short at all. I understand the pro Jack supports have an agenda to push, but really it's completely fallacious to pretend that the Ultra-bots were some nigh indestructible beings... because they weren't. They were easily destroyed by multiple sources in the episode. Sure, Jack's sword was originally unable to damage them, but that only accounts for so much.
Jack completely shattered one of the Ultra-bots by punching it with his robot arm. That is pure brute force. The arm being made of the same material would account for very little outside providing a very flimsy reasoning for why it itself wasn't destroyed in the attack (but really... Jack's arm would needed to have been made out of a significantly stronger metal for that to make any sense).
As for the rest? Adamantium can't destroy Adamantium, and have you ever tried chopping down a tree with a piece of wood? I don't imagine that would yield impressive results. The completely unverified and unsubstantiated idea that the Ultrabot's weapons might have been made out of the same material they were this case... because they were destroyed all the same.
Originally posted by The Scenario
ON THE WATER DROP AND BOUNTY HUNTERS: Which objects are we referring to that have different falling rates? As I recall, most them were thrown objects. If something being thrown downwards, of course it's going to move faster than something simply falling. None of this really changes the fact that the drop of water is framing the scene, it's entire narrative purpose was to show off Jack's speed. It's certainly no more nonsense than swimming against rapids with a large object, which kicks basic fluid physics to curb in a very similar way.
Several objects, including the body the body of at least one bounty hunters after Jack defeated him, are shown falling at a much faster pace than the water drop. It's a children's cartoon, making sense and adhering to the laws of physics aren't a huge priority, but it's pretty difficult to take that example seriously. Someone says "Look how fast he is! He did all this before a drop of water hit the ground!" and then you watch the video and gravity seems to pick and choose what it is going to work on.
Not really sure what's wrong with the Wolverine swimming against the rapids with a piano though on a scientific basis. I mean, Tugboats pull barrages, and other much larger boats behind them routinely, I even read a story once about a 12 food alligator that dragged a boat around with several fishermen in it for half an hour once. Wolverine swimming up some rapids while towing a piano is crazy, put it should be possible - if extremely difficult - for someone of his strength class.