Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
They aren't private, that was the public conversation.

Again if he was more powerful than why didn't he win his battle with Dumbleodre. Dumbleodre has more magical knowledge, way more experience, showed he could take Voldemort in a battle while he was split between protecting Harry and himself, and Voldemort is afraid of him. Wanna compare feats? We can and then see who is more powerful. Your move.

Power alone doesn't always win. Despite more experience as in years lived and the greatest wand Voldemort looked superior and has superior feats.

Beat the hogwarts shield feat, boy.

You can't.

😄

Originally posted by quanchi112
You have lost as has Albus.

Your concession was accepted months ago. Time to move on

Originally posted by juggerman
Your concession was accepted months ago. Time to move on

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can't even make it through a complete sentence and you're hideous. You look like goofy and Abe had sex and somehow had offspring.

You can ignore the filmmakers intentions but according to feats Voldemort had the most powerful ones as well as looked more powerful when up against Albus.

Your spelling is atrocious, and your grammar is even worse. Most of the time you post, I wonder if your 5 year old nephew is the one actually on the computer. Yet, you of all people want to talk about sentence structure... BWAHAHAHA... That's comedy gold.

Sorry bud, the creator of the universe is exponentially more versed on her own world. I'd say she poops all over your thoughts on the matter really. Your concession has been accepted, Dumbledore the Great wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not true at all. There is no time stamp on this. You are willingly conceding now.

You ran from this thread back in May. You rage quit. You lost.

Originally posted by juggerman
You ran from this thread back in May. You rage quit. You lost.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You don't care about impediment at all.

Power alone doesn't always win. Despite more experience as in years lived and the greatest wand Voldemort looked superior and has superior feats.

Beat the hogwarts shield feat, boy.

You can't.

😄

And that is judged by?

Well one of those is compleltey disregarded. "Looks" superior means that's how you view it thus it's disregarded. Superior feats is debatable since it all comes down to perception and context.

His performance in the cave comes to mind. While taking down the hogwarts sheild is impressive, it was made by four wizards weaker than he, already broken, and with the elder wand which here he doesn't possess, while Dumbleodre made his fire laso while weakend.

Just did.

😄

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am here today and you refuse to debate. Weakness. Voldemort wins.

Debate just so you can tap out again?

Originally posted by juggerman
Debate just so you can tap out again?

Would you expect anything less from Quan

I guess my hopes were just too high for the young man

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
And that is judged by?

Well one of those is compleltey disregarded. "Looks" superior means that's how you view it thus it's disregarded. Superior feats is debatable since it all comes down to perception and context.

His performance in the cave comes to mind. While taking down the hogwarts sheild is impressive, it was made by four wizards weaker than he, already broken, and with the elder wand which here he doesn't possess, while Dumbleodre made his fire laso while weakend.

Just did.

😄

The wand resisted him so despite the most powerful wand resisting he still did so. Dumbledore using a fire weakness to exploit shitty guys isn't impressive at all.

The wand didn't resist him.

You're retarded.

Originally posted by juggerman
Debate just so you can tap out again?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Would you expect anything less from Quan

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never forfeited the debate but you just did. Pathetic.

I guarantee that if you were debating someone and they just stopped responding you'd claim victory.

You gave up like a true weakling. You've shown your true colors and they are various shades of yellow

Originally posted by juggerman
I guarantee that if you were debating someone and they just stopped responding you'd claim victory.

You gave up like a true weakling. You've shown your true colors and they are various shades of yellow

You always give in when I turn my attention your way.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Giving up is failing to respond to the argument, you did that. You respond because you're insecure but failed to rebut so it's over.

You always give in when I turn my attention your way.

You failed to respond in May so according to your own "logic" you gave up. Well that was easy!

Just waiting on you to rage quit again

Originally posted by juggerman
You failed to respond in May so according to your own "logic" you gave up. Well that was easy!

Just waiting on you to rage quit again

Originally posted by quanchi112
There is no time table. You failed to respond to my rebuttal thus you conceded. You always do this to yourself.

You refused to respond to me therefore you gave up as per your own admission. You're too easy sometimes

Originally posted by quanchi112
This from the goofiest looking guy this side of the net.

Never in my life have I ever been called that LOL. Your hilarious shorty. I turn down girls you continually get rejected by. You're not in my league son. Actually you're short enough to be my son, just too ugly.

Originally posted by juggerman
You refused to respond to me therefore you gave up as per your own admission. You're too easy sometimes