Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Not here it doesn't. Remember Mod said it didn't.

That's one of two possible feelings. The other is overconfidence. Stop being a fanboy and think for just once in your life.

So you get the point. My spelling is irrelevant as long as you get the point that's all that matters here. The fact you waste time to correct shows me that you know I'm right thus you concede.

If he's scared and faces him then it's courage. Your own words.

You are irrelevant as is your spelling and sentence structure. No, I like mocking you because you're downright dumb.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It clearly does.

If he's scared and faces him then it's courage. Your own words.

You are irrelevant as is your spelling and sentence structure. No, I like mocking you because you're downright dumb.

Agaisnt rules sir.

Overconfidence. Overconfidence can make one do crazy things.

So by your own logic, you were beat by a dumb person. 😂 😂 Your funny. It's fun to see how you make yourself look stupid.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Agaisnt rules sir.

Overconfidence. Overconfidence can make one do crazy things.

So by your own logic, you were beat by a dumb person. 😂 😂 Your funny. It's fun to see how you make yourself look stupid.

What you say makes no sense.

You've never beaten anyone at anything, you're a joke.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are delusional.

What you say makes no sense.

You've never beaten anyone at anything, you're a joke.

The mod made these rules actually. If we could sue commentary I would be all fine with it, but the mod said we can't.

Then you are stupid because a 1st grader would understand that. If one is overconfident they think they can do anything, ala Voldmeort thinking he could beat Dumbleodre. Then at the very end when they realize they can't they are scared shitless. Voldmeort.

Except you in every thread we've been in. Yes, you are a huge joke. Just like your arguments.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
The mod made these rules actually. If we could sue commentary I would be all fine with it, but the mod said we can't.

Then you are stupid because a 1st grader would understand that. If one is overconfident they think they can do anything, ala Voldmeort thinking he could beat Dumbleodre. Then at the very end when they realize they can't they are scared shitless. Voldmeort.

Except you in every thread we've been in. Yes, you are a huge joke. Just like your arguments.

If he faced him then he showed courage. 1+1=2.

Unlike you I will be forever praised and remembered. You're that dope fumbling all over the map all the time.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You already said you're ignoring it because you're an idiot.

If he faced him then he showed courage. 1+1=2.

Unlike you I will be forever praised and remembered. You're that dope fumbling all over the map all the time.

I'm not seeing how I'm ignoring it. I'm not one attempting to use commentary agaisnt the rules. 🙂

Or overconfidence. That's why we look at his other showings and guess what it all shows more overconfidence then courage.m

Hahahaha. By who? Do explain.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That is only regarding the books when the films special features and the films say otherwise.

Sorry Quan, the creator of the universe is INTIMATELY more versed on the world she created than you. If she says Dumbledore the Magnificent is more powerful, well, he's more powerful

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Sorry Quan, the creator of the universe is INTIMATELY more versed on the world she created than you. If she says Dumbledore the Magnificent is more powerful, well, he's more powerful

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
I'm not seeing how I'm ignoring it. I'm not one attempting to use commentary agaisnt the rules. 🙂

Or overconfidence. That's why we look at his other showings and guess what it all shows more overconfidence then courage.m

Hahahaha. By who? Do explain.

So he must not fear him much if you believe he's overconfident of a duel between the two.

All.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Special features of the films says so. It isn't the book version, Abe.

Sorry Shortbus (Pun Intended) her world is EXPONENTIALLY more valuable than yours.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Sorry Shortbus (Pun Intended) her world is EXPONENTIALLY more valuable than yours.

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Her world, eh ? Your lanky unglybface aside special features counts but her books do not as they are separate.

😂

Sorry Shorty with a smushed face like he ran into a wall, her word is EXPONENTIALLY more valuable than yours. Further, in know you're a moron, but special features and commentary are excluded per mod ruling.

TIL: The creator's word over their own work doesn't count. The rants of a bandwagon jumping fanboy do

Originally posted by Robtard
TIL: The creator's word over their own work doesn't count. The rants of a bandwagon jumping fanboy do

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Sorry Shorty with a smushed face like he ran into a wall, her word is EXPONENTIALLY more valuable than yours. Further, in know you're a moron, but special features and commentary are excluded per mod ruling.

You can ignore the filmmakers intentions but according to feats Voldemort had the most powerful ones as well as looked more powerful when up against Albus.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It still exists and counts. 🙂

So he must not fear him much if you believe he's overconfident of a duel between the two.

All.

Exist yes. Counts not here.

Again overconfidence takes place of courage. Then you look at Voldemorts other showings and yes it was overconfidence not courage.

Yep, you live in your own little world. You'll be rembered, but not positively.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Exist yes. Counts not here.

Again overconfidence takes place of courage. Then you look at Voldemorts other showings and yes it was overconfidence not courage.

Yep, you live in your own little world. You'll be rembered, but not positively.

If he's afraid it's courage.

Irony.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is reality so it always counts.

If he's afraid it's courage.

Irony.

Therefore, the ruling is that a written adaptation of this film, as well as cast/crew commentaries made after the film has been completed, screened, and transferred to home media, will not be allowable. Movie feats only, please. From Impediment.

I've been asked to step in to make a ruling on the matter at hand.

The primary issue in contention is the use of novelizations/book adaptations.

I refer you all to the MVF Golden Rule: What happens on screen is canon. Movie feats only.

I allow certain feats, for example, from the Star Trek television series because of the direct tie in to the movies.

Books, in my opinion, are waters I choose not to tread into. A novelization of, say, an Indiana Jones movie, while much more elaborate in wording and pace, is still not a movie; it's merely an written adaptation that, as history suggests, will improvise, elaborate, and possibly alter certain aspects of the movie it is adapting. The same goes with comic books, manga, and other written works pertaining to certain movies.

Therefore, the ruling is that a written adaptation of this film, as well as cast/crew commentaries made after the film has been completed, screened, and transferred to home media, will not be allowable. Movie feats only, please.

A much, much more suitable area for this kind of debate is, of course, the All Versus Forum where ALL source material is allowed.

__________________

It's a funny world we live in.
Last edited by Impediment on Sep 30th, 2015 at 07:36 PM

Old Post Sep 30th, 2015 04:24 PM
Impediment is currently offline Click here to Send Impediment a Private Message Find more posts by Impediment Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote

Impediment
Relentless

Gender: Male
Location: My own little world

Moderator

I'm also curious about something:

Are people contesting the use of non-adaptation books such as the Star Wars "Essential Guide To" books?

__________________

It's a funny world we live in.

Old Post Sep 30th, 2015 04:29 PM
Impediment is currently offline Click here to Send Impediment a Private Message Find more posts by Impediment Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote

KuRuPT Thanosi
Senior Member
Gender:
Location: United States

Wait... I get cast and crew commentary not being used, but you're saying commentary from Lucas in the extended version is not allowed? That I just can't agree with if so, the person in charge of everything in re: movie production, script and the creator of the universe commentary is above all else imo

Old Post Sep 30th, 2015 05:23 PM
KuRuPT Thanosi is currently offline Click here to Send KuRuPT Thanosi a Private Message Find more posts by KuRuPT Thanosi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote

Impediment
Relentless

Gender: Male
Location: My own little world

Moderator

What would the extended version commentaries have that would alter any outcome?

__________________

The second part is the whole conversation. This was in the Windu and Yoda vs Tyranus and Sidious thread page 12. See not my rules.m

Or overconfidence. It's all up to perception I suppose. However when looking at his other feats it's overconfidence.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Therefore, the ruling is that a written adaptation of this film, as well as cast/crew commentaries made after the film has been completed, screened, and transferred to home media, will not be allowable. Movie feats only, please. From Impediment.

I've been asked to step in to make a ruling on the matter at hand.

The primary issue in contention is the use of novelizations/book adaptations.

I refer you all to the MVF Golden Rule: What happens on screen is canon. Movie feats only.

I allow certain feats, for example, from the Star Trek television series because of the direct tie in to the movies.

Books, in my opinion, are waters I choose not to tread into. A novelization of, say, an Indiana Jones movie, while much more elaborate in wording and pace, is still not a movie; it's merely an written adaptation that, as history suggests, will improvise, elaborate, and possibly alter certain aspects of the movie it is adapting. The same goes with comic books, manga, and other written works pertaining to certain movies.

Therefore, the ruling is that a written adaptation of this film, as well as cast/crew commentaries made after the film has been completed, screened, and transferred to home media, will not be allowable. Movie feats only, please.

A much, much more suitable area for this kind of debate is, of course, the All Versus Forum where ALL source material is allowed.

__________________

It's a funny world we live in.
Last edited by Impediment on Sep 30th, 2015 at 07:36 PM

Old Post Sep 30th, 2015 04:24 PM
Impediment is currently offline Click here to Send Impediment a Private Message Find more posts by Impediment Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote

Impediment
Relentless

Gender: Male
Location: My own little world

Moderator

I'm also curious about something:

Are people contesting the use of non-adaptation books such as the Star Wars "Essential Guide To" books?

__________________

It's a funny world we live in.

Old Post Sep 30th, 2015 04:29 PM
Impediment is currently offline Click here to Send Impediment a Private Message Find more posts by Impediment Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote

KuRuPT Thanosi
Senior Member
Gender:
Location: United States

Wait... I get cast and crew commentary not being used, but you're saying commentary from Lucas in the extended version is not allowed? That I just can't agree with if so, the person in charge of everything in re: movie production, script and the creator of the universe commentary is above all else imo

Old Post Sep 30th, 2015 05:23 PM
KuRuPT Thanosi is currently offline Click here to Send KuRuPT Thanosi a Private Message Find more posts by KuRuPT Thanosi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote

Impediment
Relentless

Gender: Male
Location: My own little world

Moderator

What would the extended version commentaries have that would alter any outcome?

__________________

The second part is the whole conversation. This was in the Windu and Yoda vs Tyranus and Sidious thread page 12. See not my rules.m

Or overconfidence. It's all up to perception I suppose. However when looking at his other feats it's overconfidence.

Voldemort is still superior by feats. I win every single way and it feels so good.

💃

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why would you post pms ? You're despicable.

Voldemort is still superior by feats. I win every single way and it feels so good.

💃

They aren't private, that was the public conversation.

Again if he was more powerful than why didn't he win his battle with Dumbleodre. Dumbleodre has more magical knowledge, way more experience, showed he could take Voldemort in a battle while he was split between protecting Harry and himself, and Voldemort is afraid of him. Wanna compare feats? We can and then see who is more powerful. Your move.