Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think he's seen them or it's been so long he doesn't remember a thing from them.Another still from the copy of DH5 he watched:
You understand why he doesn't understand McClane's ability to tank explosions now.
LOL, that explosion isn't even comparable to this one:
Your fanboyish dodging is so pathetic, but keep at it, bubba 😆
Originally posted by Lestov16
😆 What a coward. You can't lie and say that McClane tanked a bigger explosion than Indy because he clearly didn't, so you're tiptoeing by criticizing the quality of the video I watched, when it clearly doesn't matter. What troll tactics, and you accuse Quan of being a fanboy 😂 Keep dodging, bubba
Now you're avoiding the point by making another strawman.
The point: You had no idea, since what you watched was indiscernible.
Dodge what now? Fanboy what now? I already weighed in who wins here; it wasn't "McClane pwns!". Judging movies before you've seen them (blurs don't count) and nonstop fallacies is why you always fail in here. You should work on cleaning up your act. 🙂
Too bad that's not the point. Even from the blurry scene, I can tell that's not an Indy nuke level explosion, and the only reason you would have a point was if I was wrong, which I'm clearly not, which is why you are trying to dodge by diverting attention towards me, when the onscreen evidence clearly speaks for itself. You're trying to dodge that Indy clearly outranks McClane on every level, including durability, and he doesn't tie with McClane as you tried to say, but clearly beats him. So keep dodging, bubba. You're the only one looking like an imbecile 😆
Originally posted by Lestov16
Too bad that's not the point. Even from the blurry scene, I can tell that's not an Indy nuke level explosion, and the only reason you would have a point was if I was wrong, which I'm clearly not, which is why you are trying to dodge by diverting attention towards me, when the onscreen evidence clearly speaks for itself. You're trying to dodge that Indy clearly outranks McClane on every level, including durability, and he doesn't tie with McClane as you tried to say, but clearly beats him. So keep dodging, bubba. You're the only one looking like an imbecile 😆
Incorrect, it's exactly the point. You're still arguing from a point of ignorance from not having watched DH5. This is why you'll always fail until you do.
You have no basis to compare the explosions/scenes. While the explosion in the Chernobyl plant wasn't anywhere as large as the atom bomb in IJ4(I know, cos I've seen both), that atom bomb wasn't at ground zero; likely several miles out, as the military back in the day tested the affects of nukes on cities/people at varying distances and Indiana had the luxury of being fully enclosed in a lead case. While in regards to DH5 you have no idea the type of explosion, the size of the explosion, where McClane was in relation to the explosion and what kind of cover (if any) he had.
So you see, you not knowing and judging is exactly the point. Watch DH5, otherwise your argument here is the same as it basically always is when McClane is involved: "McClane loses cos I hate him."
I even offered to send you the movie at one point.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Did Indy tank a nuclear explosion: YesDid McClane tank a nuclear explosion (or explosion of similar yield): No
That's all that needs to be known. Your pathetic dodging is hilarious, Robbie. The Average Joes should recruit you.
And now you fish for red herrings, but I'll entertain you anyways.
-The fridge tanked the nuclear explosion. Indy took the acceleration and crashing forces associated with the fridge's flight, which would have been considerable. Stop acting like Indy faced the full fury of an atom bomb at ground zero.
-You have no real idea, since you've not seen DH5 and are going off the bits I told you. You're essentially taking shots in the dark.
All that needs to be known is that you've not seen DH5 and just rant "McClane loses" in every McClane thread. You even necro old McClane threads and switch sides. Stands to reason you're going to eventually blind-guess something correct. But that's besides the point. Again, what am I dodging?
The Point 2.0: If I showed you clips of the DH5 and IJ4 explosions with both of them in your ridiculously blurred formats, you'd have no idea what either entailed besides that something exploded in both. Yet somehow you feel you're capable of objectively judging.
PS, The Average Joes are dodgeball champions, bro. So thanks. 🙂
Originally posted by Lestov16Lol, /thread.
LOL, that explosion isn't even comparable to this one:Your fanboyish dodging is so pathetic, but keep at it, bubba 😆
Originally posted by Lestov16
Did Indy tank a nuclear explosion: Nope. The fridge did.Did McClane tank a nuclear explosion (or explosion of similar yield): No, cause he prevented them. Although the explosion in DH5 in chernobyl was WAY off of the scale compared to anything Indy survived without hiding in something.
Fixed.
Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
Lol, /thread.
to be fair, this video evidence doesn't do as much in the way of showcasing, Indys ability to endure an explosion as much as it does to feature the craftsmanship of the icebox maker. To me this proves nothing. Indy didn't survive the explosion, the icebox did