John McClane vs Indiana Jones

You're like a little worm on a big ****in hook, man. Here's what happened...

Mac and her fought. She beat him to the ground, looked at his STILL, NON MOVING form and assumed he was down for good, then, yes, she went back to Farrell to make him undo what he had did.

Then, Mac got up, beat her to the ground, then walked back to Farrell (same as she did in fact) to tell him to carry on what he was doing. She got up and BFR'd his ass.

Doesn't matter if she was down longer, she held the upper hand at the end of the H2H battle. It was only because of an SUV that Mac was able to win. Hell, even then he had help from gravity and Farrell.

To say that she saw him moving while on the ground is just plain silly. If she had seen him moving, she would have bent down and snapped his neck.

She was KO'd.
Unconscious.
At McClane's mercy.
Beaten H2H.
Then killed.

In other words:

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
🙄 McClane won. Job done. End of.

Commence angry tearflow.

OK, but just so you know, you are altering what we saw onscreen.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
🙄 McClane won. Job done. End of.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
So you think she saw him moving and walked away from him? Really, dude?

I posted second-for-second screen caps. It's not what I "think", it's what I know because it's on screen. Here it is again, it's 1:19 to 1:18, cos the timer on the vid counts in reverse.

We've done this dance before, it's stupid to do it yet again. McClane was not KO'd.

You know how to screen cap I'm sure, if McClane was knocked out, then post a screen cap. Though I don't see how you can do it considering it's all in a 1-2 second time frame.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
She was KO'd.
Unconscious.
At McClane's mercy.
Beaten H2H.
Then killed.

In other words:

Commence angry tearflow.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You clearly ignore the context, troll. That's what trolls do.

Much obliged. Now grab some tissues quick lest you drown.

Nope I didn't. The context was McClane won. Ko'd his opponent, who could not KO him, and then he killed her and saved the day.

Originally posted by Robtard
I posted second-for-second screen caps. It's not what I "think", it's what I know because it's on screen. Here it is again, it's 1:19 to 1:18, cos the timer on the vid counts in reverse.

We've done this dance before, it's stupid to do it yet again. McClane was not KO'd.

You know how to screen cap I'm sure, if McClane was knocked out, then post a screen cap. Though I don't see how you can do it considering it's all in a 1-2 second time frame.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Much obliged. Now grab some tissues quick lest you drown.

Nope I didn't. The context was McClane won. Ko'd his opponent, who could not KO him, and then he killed her and saved the day.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
Lol, dodge. As usual.

Showing you that your premise is wrong with video and video stills as proof isn't a dodge, it's called countering your point with evidence.

I'm guessing you're just trolling, since we've done this exact dance before. But in case you're not, I asked you to do your own stills if you think what I posted is somehow wrong. Do you think the video is lying?

Originally posted by Robtard
Showing you that your premise is wrong with video and video stills as proof isn't a dodge, it's called countering your point with evidence.

I'm guessing you're just trolling, since we've done this exact dance before. But in case you're not, I asked you to do your own stills if you think what I posted is somehow wrong. Do you think the video is lying?

Originally posted by quanchi112
The context isn't the end result the context is how he won. You don't even know what the word context means. Troll.

My understanding of the word is more accurate of yours as the context you use it in doesn't accurately fit.

McClane won. Especially due in the context of his knocking out his opponent H2H, his killing her, and saving the east coast of America and the day with it.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
My understanding of the word is more accurate of yours as the context you use it in doesn't accurately fit.

McClane won. Especially due in the context of his knocking out his opponent H2H, his killing her, and saving the east coast of America and the day with it.

Well thats not an applicable argument here.

And its self pwning one. Cause by your definition, Lindy lost to the sword guy in Raiders, the Boxer dude under the flying wing, and pretty much everyone else he dominated by and was saved by the bell with a rotor, or a stone crusher, or a gun intervening in.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
My understanding of the word is more accurate of yours as the context you use it in doesn't accurately fit.

McClane won. Especially due in the context of his knocking out his opponent H2H, his killing her, and saving the east coast of America and the day with it.

She crushed him and then when she turned around the stalker laid into her. He doesn't respect women or the rules of engagement.

Indy dominates him.

Originally posted by Robtard
I posted second-for-second screen caps. It's not what I "think", it's what I know because it's on screen. Here it is again, it's 1:19 to 1:18, cos the timer on the vid counts in reverse.

We've done this dance before, it's stupid to do it yet again. McClane was not KO'd.

You know how to screen cap I'm sure, if McClane was knocked out, then post a screen cap. Though I don't see how you can do it considering it's all in a 1-2 second time frame.

Prove that it is real time.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
Answer my question then.

I answered your question directly. McClane was not knocked out, I then posted stills. She turned to take care of Farrell, before he ruined her mission.

Stop trolling, okay.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Prove that it is real time.

You want me to prove that times flows and we normally track it second-per-second? Idiotic.

Considering we've also gone through this scene before and you were shown to be wrong last time in your claims, you're clearly still immensely butthurt.

He is indeed. Pathologically and pathetically predictably so.

Originally posted by Robtard
You want me to prove that times flows and we normally track it second-per-second? .

I want you to prove that the scene was in real time, since the rest of the film clearly wasn't.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
He is indeed. Pathologically and pathetically predictably so.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I want you to prove that the scene was in real time, since the rest of the film clearly wasn't.

LoL. The desperation. Anyhow.

Because it obviously flows in real time, there are no cuts/jumps to the future. Maybe you should watch it again: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7mo2k_live-free-or-die-hard-kung-fu_shortfilms#.UU-1VlcoG71 Enjoy.