Odin/Thor vs Galactus

Started by eaebiakuya7 pages

Channeling own energy to the Mjolnir = Godblast.

And guys, those 3 entities were going to destroy the entire Multiverse. Would make no sense a Godblast do any damage at all. Getting they atenttion is a big feat.

the captions sure sound like a godblast

Originally posted by Damborgson
http://oi48.tinypic.com/169m5ps.jpg
http://oi45.tinypic.com/o6mmph.jpg

There has never been a godblast that looked like that. Some lightning maybe, but it's always been a direct beam of power shot from Mjolnir. Not a spread out lightning blast like that one. It's ballsy to call it a G-blast, and there isn't enough proof to call it one in my opinion.

Had it been one, so be it. But it's fairly clear that it wasn't.


The very first GB that Thor fired on Galactus on-panel was also illustrated as a combination of lightning and force waves. Plus, even though the wording is somewhat different here, as instead of life-force, we have "body,mind,spirit" used along with "all that they are" which can also easily include Thor's godly life-energies. The difference in the wording can also be attributed to it being narrated by Oblivion, so again the point becomes moot.

Imo, there was enough evidence to showcase that this attack was a Godblast. However, seeing how we've had a heated version of this argument on youtube before, to each his own.

Originally posted by leonidas
nor was it "aimed" at anyone in particular, but rather sent outwards to all 3.

It was shot at all 3. I fail to see how it hitting all 3 of them takes it away from him tanking it, unless you think that there is something called "shared tanking" as well. 😂

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
The very first GB that Thor used against Galactus on-panel was also illustrated as a combination of lightning and force waves. Plus, even though the wording is somewhat different here, as instead of life-force, we have "body,mind,spirit" used along with "all that they are" which can also easily include Thor's godly life-energies. The difference in the wording can also be attributed to it being narrated by Oblivion, so again the point becomes moot.

Imo, there was enough evidence to showcase that this attack was a Godblast. However, seeing how we've had a heated version of this argument on youtube before, to each his own

I had not considered that actually

They're similar, similar enough to where I can get what you're coming from, but there is still a difference. aside from the initial lightning to charge, Mjolnir still shot out an energy blast, and not a lightning blast like in the scans. It shout out "bludgeoning force waves" and the form they had was distinct from lightning even with the not so great art of the time.

Thor's put everything he's had into attacks before, lightning blasts no less, without them being considered godblasts.

Hmm. It'd probably be for the better in the end. I respect your opinion about it though 👆

Originally posted by Damborgson
I had not considered that actually

They're similar, similar enough to where I can get what you're coming from, but there is still a difference. aside from the initial lightning to charge, Mjolnir still shot out an energy blast, and not a lightning blast like in the scans. It shout out "bludgeoning force waves" and the form they had was distinct from lightning even with the not so great art of the time.

Thor's put everything he's had into attacks before, lightning blasts no less, without them being considered godblasts.

Hmm. It'd probably be for the better in the end. I respect your opinion about it though 👆


That depends on whether you can consider lightning blasts and energy blasts as the same thing due the art under which they were all drawn. For example, the blasts from the 3 Abstracts in the very first panel of the first scan both you and I posted clearly seem like lightning blasts, yet it's rare for an Abstract Beings like these to use "lightning" as a weapon. Another example, Galactus' eye beams were illustratively portrayed as purple lightning, but we don't automatically assume that it means that it was only lightning because it's not specified to be so on-panel.

Ah, but this particular attack was being assisted in by Surfer and Rachel as well, and I am fairly sure that it is not regular for them to throw out lightning barrages randomly like that.

I am 100% sure that it's a Godblast as of now. You actually had me convinced with these points of yours before on youtube....until I met Bran.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
The very first GB that Thor fired on Galactus on-panel was also illustrated as a combination of lightning and force waves. Plus, even though the wording is somewhat different here, as instead of life-force, we have "body,mind,spirit" used along with "all that they are" which can also easily include Thor's godly life-energies. The difference in the wording can also be attributed to it being narrated by Oblivion, so again the point becomes moot.

Imo, there was enough evidence to showcase that this attack was a Godblast. However, seeing how we've had a heated version of this argument on youtube before, to each his own.

It was shot at all 3. I fail to see how it hitting all 3 of them takes it away from him tanking it, unless you think that there is something called "shared tanking" as well. 😂

😕

they shot it at all of them. 3 abstract level guys shared the blast. was it focused on one? it was an aoe attack. that's much different from a fully focused blast. that....shouldn't really need to be said. 😐

Originally posted by leonidas
😕

they shot it at all of them. 3 abstract level guys shared the blast. was it focused on one? it was an aoe attack. that's much different from a fully focused blast. that....shouldn't really need to be said. 😐


All of them bore the brunt of the blast. All 3 of them tanked it point blank. Sorry , but this idea of "shared tanking" just sounds plain ridiculous. That shouldn't really be need to be said. Not to mention that it was amped by Surfer and Rachel as well.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
All of them bore the brunt of the blast. All 3 of them tanked it point blank. Sorry , but this idea of "shared tanking" just sounds plain ridiculous. That shouldn't really be need to be said.

it's not really shared, but nor was it focused on anyone. do you think taking a focused blast=taking an aoe attack not aimed at anyone but aimed to get everyone's attention?

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
All of them bore the brunt of the blast. All 3 of them tanked it point blank. Sorry , but this idea of "shared tanking" just sounds plain ridiculous. That shouldn't really be need to be said. Not to mention that it was amped by Surfer and Rachel as well.
leo means that galactus took 1/3 of that blast, 1/3 of what actually hit the targets

Originally posted by psycho gundam
leo means that galactus took 1/3 of that blast.

umm, is that somehow debateable......?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
leo means that galactus took 1/3 of that blast.

Shared tanking.

If the other 2 weren't there, then the blast that hit them would have hit... space.

The blast wasn't wasted this way, and it wrapped around all of them. It's not like it dissipated after hitting someone.

Galactus wasn't hungry this time. Galactus wasn't unshielded while engaging in a TP fight. Galactus was directly in battle mode, and an amped G-Blast did shit.
As it should be.

Even if Galactus took 1/3 the GB, it was a GB amped by two other heralds, so it evens out.

Originally posted by leonidas
umm, is that somehow debateable......?

3xAmped Godblast. 🙂

Even going by your logic, Galactus still tanked a Godblast.

seriously.....? this can't be serious....

a set amount of energy was released. g absorbed some, other absorbed some and scrier absorbed some. lots was simply scattered outwards.

and you somehow forgot to answer my question.....

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
3xAmped Godblast. 🙂

Even going by your logic, Galactus still tanked a Godblast.

only if you assume they can output the equivalent to the godblast. 🙂 extremely doubtful imo.

Originally posted by leonidas
it's not really shared, but nor was it focused on anyone. do you think taking a focused blast=taking an aoe attack not aimed at anyone but aimed to get everyone's attention?

Except for the part where it was focused on the 3 mad Abstracts? It hit all 3 of them from a few feet away, without any of them getting any shielding whatsoever, and it was potent enough that being aoe would hardly reduce its effectiveness.

Also, the blast exploded directly after.

Like seriously.

okey dokey then.

Originally posted by leonidas
only if you assume they can output the equivalent to the godblast. 🙂 extremely doubtful imo.

They were portrayed as peers on a spiritual and metaphysical level. Nobody disputes that physically Thor was the mightiest of the 3, but the Godblast is an attack fueled by everything they were.