Can the Sword of Gryffindor destroy Sauron's ring ?

Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
That is a very good point. However even the One Ring didnt melt right away. Now I would... Assume.. that with the Sword put into the Lava wouldnt melt right away either. And since the Sword took in the Basalisk Vemon within the few seconds Harry stabbed it and withdrew it... I would assume that just dipping it in would draw in the power and keep it from melting. The sword would not need to be IN the lava for very long beyond a few seconds.

This of course is just me taking a guess.

Originally posted by Robtard
Even normal steel wouldn't melt in a few seconds in lava. So if it's just a drive by, the sword should be fine.

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMM!

Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
Well yeah. Normal Steel wouldnt melt. But this isnt just normal Steel nor is it just a Normal river of Lava. This is Mount Doom.

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMM!

Mount Doom's lava didn't seem especially hotter than standard lava and the One Ring only being able to be destroyed there isn't an issue of having 'X' amount of heat.

If the One Ring, which has shown itself to be far stronger than the Gryffindor sword, can be instantly turned into goo in Mount Doom's magma, I don't see how the sword will withstand an encounter.

Originally posted by Lestov16
If the One Ring, which has shown itself to be far stronger than the Gryffindor sword, can be instantly turned into goo in Mount Doom's magma, I don't see how the sword will withstand an encounter.

Not instantly, slappy.

One Ring sat on the lava for 22-23 seconds before it started to show signs of being affected and a little over a minute to fully melt/be destroyed.

Even so, it was a lot more durable than the sword. I'm not seeing the sword take a dip and being in ring-slicing condition afterward.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Even so, it was a lot more durable than the sword. I'm not seeing the sword take a dip and being in ring-slicing condition afterward.

I normal rod of steel would be heated up, but it would be alright if you just laid it on a bed of lava for a couple seconds.

I don't think it's crazy to assume that the Sword of Gryffindor is at least as durable as a normal steel sword.

What makes the ring more durable than a Horcrux ?

Originally posted by Lestov16
Hell phucking no.

/thread

Originally posted by quanchi112
What makes the ring more durable than a Horcrux ?

It only being able to be destroyed one way (with the powers that created it) for one. Mount Doom. Names says it all, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What makes the ring more durable than a Horcrux ?

The fact that it was forged from one of the top 5 or so most powerful beings in the LOTR Universe.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why not ?

What feats does the sword have that show that it can damage the undamageable. We have onscreen feats of the Ring resisting blade damage, and Godric's sword has never shown itself stronger than any LoTR weapons.

Originally posted by Robtard
It only being able to be destroyed one way (with the powers that created it) for one. Mount Doom. Names says it all, kid.

Originally posted by KingD19
The fact that it was forged from one of the top 5 or so most powerful beings in the LOTR Universe.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's only in its native universe kid where Harry Potter characters don't exist. No limits fallacy, kiddo.

😂 "I like Harry Potter better than LoTR, so it wins!" This is your only argument. You don't know what a No Limit Fallacy is, so stop saying it.

Watch LoTR, it's stated how the One Ring can be destroyed. The film lore > what you want.

Originally posted by Lestov16
What feats does the sword have that show that it can damage the undamageable. We have onscreen feats of the Ring resisting blade damage, and Godric's sword has never shown itself stronger than any LoTR weapons.

Originally posted by Robtard
😂 "I like Harry Potter better than LoTR, so it wins!" This is your only argument. You don't know what a No Limit Fallacy is, so stop saying it.

Watch LoTR, it's stated how the One Ring can be destroyed. The film lore > what you want.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What does this have to do with other fictional universes ?

Beings on the level of Sauron were shifting continents and reshaping the world.

Don't try to compare the sword of Griffyndor to Sauron's power.

Originally posted by KingD19
Beings on the level of Sauron were shifting continents and reshaping the world.

Don't try to compare the sword of Griffyndor to Sauron's power.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That only applies to Lotr characters not every other character in fiction. You don't even understand how ignorant you sound.

Says who? You. 😂

Find me something comparable in HP to Mount Doom and the set conditions and you'd have the beginnings of a valid point, chimpo. Just randomly saying HP >LoTR isn't a proper argument.