Can the Sword of Gryffindor destroy Sauron's ring ?

Started by Silent Master11 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
Name the greatest resistance feat on screen. I honestly don't think you've seen the movie otherwise why make this claim.

Claiming that i've not watched the movies is one of your dumbest arguments ever, seeing as I've had to correct you multiple times regarding things from the movies.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You're ridiculous. You say stupid things. It has the basilisk venom it's a clear power to take on what makes it stronger. Did you think any sword absorbs basilisk venom ? Make some sense.

Fiendfyre, Shield incineration, One shot kill magic, a basilisk which kills what makes eye contact with it, etc. In Lotr one dragon has Gandalf nervous while in Potter they are used to test young man and kept in chains.

Baslisks are powerful and would take out massive numbers in Lotr.

Cry some more. A strawman argument, shocking. I obviously knew the sword's absorbing powers and I obviously knew the only reason the sword destroyed a horcrux was because it had previously taken on the poison aspect. Now you're pretending you're the one that knew all along and that I didn't have to tell you. 😂

Yup, still back to blanket "HP > LoTR" arguments. The sword destroyed a horcrux (ignoring that it had basilisk poison), ergo it can destroy the One Ring/anything. No Limit Fallacy nonsense.

A Red Herring. Not that it's necessarily true, but that has nothing to do with the Grif sword destroying the One Ring. Try harder.

Topic: Now anytime you want to stop dancing and show how the sword's powerful enough to destroy the One Ring besides your blanket "HP > LoTR" nonsense, it'll be good. 🙂

Originally posted by Silent Master
Claiming that i've not watched the movies is one of your dumbest arguments ever, seeing as I've had to correct you multiple times regarding things from the movies.
Quit sidestepping the question. If you can't name one resistant feat you feel is impressive you either didn't see the movies or did and aren't going to answer due to realize they aren't impressive.

Originally posted by Robtard
Cry some more. A strawman argument, shocking. I obviously knew the sword's absorbing powers and I obviously knew the only reason the sword destroyed a horcrux was because it had previously taken on the poison aspect. Now you're pretending you're the one that knew all along and that I didn't have to tell you. 😂

Yup, still back to blanket "HP > LoTR" arguments. The sword destroyed a horcrux (ignoring that it had basilisk poison), ergo it can destroy the One Ring/anything. No Limit Fallacy nonsense.

A Red Herring. Not that it's necessarily true, but that has nothing to do with the Grif sword destroying the One Ring. Try harder.

Topic: Now anytime you want to stop dancing and show how the sword's powerful enough to destroy the One Ring besides your blanket "HP > LoTR" nonsense, it'll be good. 🙂

You're trying to take away from this sword it's properties since other swords don't have this ability. That's what makes the sword impressive you boob.

What has the one ring resisted ? Horcruxes have resisted far worse based on feats.

Give me a list of impressive things the ring has resisted.

Better resistance feats. 😂

Potterverse is superior to Lotr. It must drive you wild. You'll abandon these threads while I won't. It's just a matter of time.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You're trying to take away from this sword it's properties since other swords don't have this ability. That's what makes the sword impressive you boob.

What has the one ring resisted ?

Horcruxes have resisted far worse based on feats.

Give me a list of impressive things the ring has resisted.

Better resistance feats. 😂

Potterverse is superior to Lotr. It must drive you wild. You'll abandon these threads while I won't. It's just a matter of time.

Still beating that strawman, eh. What a coward.

It's said it can only be destroyed in Mount Doom, where it was created. The film lore > what you want. Sorry. Imp's even ruled here on it. Cry more now.

Oh really? Name them then. You keep saying "far worse", but refuse to make a list with examples. Make a list or STFU. (I expect another dodge)

Repeat: Now anytime you want to stop dancing and show how the sword's powerful enough to destroy the One Ring besides your blanket "HP > LoTR" nonsense, it'll be good. 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Still beating that strawman, eh. What a coward.

It's said it can only be destroyed in Mount Doom, where it was created. The film lore > what you want. Sorry. Imp's even ruled here on it. Cry more now.

Oh really? Name them then. You keep saying "far worse", but refuse to make a list with examples. Make a list or STFU. (I expect another dodge)

Repeat: Now anytime you want to stop dancing and show how the sword's powerful enough to destroy the One Ring besides your blanket "HP > LoTR" nonsense, it'll be good. 🙂

I'm asking for you to back your case. You can't. You never can.

You first. We know Mount Doom destroys it. What is most powerful attack it resisted on film ? Was it that badass Orc killing dwarf ? 😂 😂

Sword has Horcrux destroying feats. What has the ring resisted which has you in awe ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I'm asking for you to back your case. You can't. You never can.

You first. We know Mount Doom destroys it. What is most powerful attack it resisted on film ? Was it that badass Orc killing dwarf ? 😂 😂

Sword has Horcrux destroying feats. What has the ring resisted which has you in awe ?

Nope, you're using strawman tactics. It's what you often resort to when cornered.

😂 I knew you'd dodge, what a coward. It took Mount Doom to destroy the One Ring. The film lore > you. The forum mod > you. Top those, sucker. (I expect you'll dodge again)

Repeat: Cos it was amped with the basilisk poison, dunce.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nope, you're using strawman tactics. It's what you often resort to when cornered.

😂 I knew you'd dodge, what a coward. It took Mount Doom to destroy the One Ring. The film lore > you. The forum mod > you. Top those, sucker. (I expect you'll dodge again)

Repeat: Cos it was amped with the basilisk poison, dunce.

Do you realize what you sound like ? It's like saying hey look Mike Tyson knocked me out therefore George Foreman goes down. Why because I got crushed by Mike Tyson. That's essentially your logic in a nutshell.

Mount Doom destroys the ring but that doesn't have anything to do with what it can resist.

The sword takes in what is stronger. All swords don't thus making it quite different.
😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Do you realize what you sound like ? It's like saying hey look Mike Tyson knocked me out therefore George Foreman goes down. Why because I got crushed by Mike Tyson. That's essentially your logic in a nutshell.

Mount Doom destroys the ring but that doesn't have anything to do with what it can resist.

The sword takes in what is stronger. All swords don't thus making it quite different.
😂

Strawmaning still.

😂 Oh how you fail and dodge.

And a red herring. Anyhow: How is the sword going to destroy the One Ring? (I expect you'll dodge again)

Originally posted by Robtard
Strawmaning still.

😂 Oh how you fail and dodge.

And a red herring. Anyhow: How is the sword going to destroy the One Ring? (I expect you'll dodge again)

😂

Asking you questions is awesome. You can't even form a coherent argument. The typical strawman, derp, cry, or dance responses. I'm beginning to think you're someone's parakeet that can type.

By cutting into it since its destroyed Horcruxes with greater resistance feats than the Ring. Question answered; again.

Originally posted by quanchi112
😂

Asking you questions is awesome. You can't even form a coherent argument. The typical strawman, derp, cry, or dance responses. I'm beginning to think you're someone's parakeet that can type.

By cutting into it since its destroyed Horcruxes with greater resistance feats than the Ring. Question answered; again.

Expected dance. Ignoring. 🙂

Repeat: Name them then. You keep saying "far worse/greater feats", but refuse to make a list with examples. Make a list or STFU. (I expect another dodge)

Originally posted by Robtard
Expected dance. Ignoring. 🙂

Repeat: Name them then. You keep saying "far worse/greater feats", but refuse to make a list with examples. Make a list or STFU. (I expect another dodge)

I answered your question but you cannot answer mine. Wizard magic is clearly more powerful than what the ring has resisted on screen. Your shitty Mike Tyson logic shows you to be ignorant. You don't even understand what you're saying half the time.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I answered your question but you cannot answer mine. Wizard magic is clearly more powerful than what the ring has resisted on screen. Your shitty Mike Tyson logic shows you to be ignorant. You don't even understand what you're saying half the time.

LoL, the expected dodge followed by the nonsense blanket argument.

Repeat: Name them then. You keep saying "far worse/greater feats", but refuse to make a list with examples. Make a list or STFU. (I expect another dodge)

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, the expected dodge followed by the nonsense blanket argument.

Repeat: Name them then. You keep saying "far worse/greater feats", but refuse to make a list with examples. Make a list or STFU. (I expect another dodge)

Just because you don't remember the film and clearly won't answer any of my questions don't expect me to cater to your demands.

You can't even tell me what the ring resisted. You don't think for yourself as most don't. You've been told numerous times how badass this ring is despite not logically assessing the situation yourself.

Ring has no impressive feats and you know it. Only a fool would use a ring destroying feat as proof of its resistance.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Just because you don't remember the film and clearly won't answer any of my questions don't expect me to cater to your demands.

You can't even tell me what the ring resisted. You don't think for yourself as most don't. You've been told numerous times how badass this ring is despite not logically assessing the situation yourself.

Ring has no impressive feats and you know it. Only a fool would use a ring destroying feat as proof of its resistance.

Still dodging.

Watch LoTR, read the pages as it's been explained or see Imp's ruling.

Expect for being nigh indestructible you mean. Basic LoTR lore.

Originally posted by Robtard
Still dodging.

Watch LoTR, read the pages as it's been explained or see Imp's ruling.

Expect for being nigh indestructible you mean. Basic LoTR lore.

Typical non response. It isn't indestructible and neither are Horcruxes. It's just difficult to do so. Without resistance feats it's a no limits fallacy bs. Just start thinking for yourself and quit submitting to other men's opinions.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Typical non response. It isn't indestructible and neither are Horcruxes. It's just difficult to do so. Without resistance feats it's a no limits fallacy bs. Just start thinking for yourself and quit submitting to other men's opinions.

Reading comprehension fail or resorting to another strawman?

Let me repeat it for you:

Expect for being nigh indestructible you mean. Basic LoTR lore.

Originally posted by Robtard
Reading comprehension fail or resorting to another strawman?

Let me repeat it for you:

Expect for being nigh indestructible you mean. Basic LoTR lore.

Nigh indestructible means it can be destroyed. I agree. Sog destroys it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nigh indestructible means it can be destroyed. I agree. Sog destroys it.

By the fires of Mount Doom. The sword isn't like the fires of Mount Doom. 🙂

People seem to ignore the fact that the SoG is still a Magical Sword. Not only that but it only takes in that which makes it stronger. Not only has the SoG destroyed the undamagable in Harry Potter Universe. And since it is a MAGICAL Weapon if would survive for a few seconds if put into the lava at Mount Doom.. the same Lava used to FORGE the One Ring. With the SoG imbued with the magical fires of Mount doom I would say it would easily destroy the one ring.