Originally posted by quanchi112
Movies you tool. Fanboys like yourself start book feating it up. Movies only. 😂 😂
The movies are pretty much directly lifted from the book. It wasn't shown on screen, but we know what happened leading up to the Third Age because it wouldn't be the Third Age if it hadn't happened.
You just wank HP so hard it's impossible for you to think they lose.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can the Sword of Gryffindor destroy Sauron's ring ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
A dwarf being unable to destroy it and a weak wizard in Gandalf don't compare to Potter magic alone.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Horcruxes resisted magic but the Gryffindor sword cut through them like nothing.
Were any of those horcruxes forged in a volcano
Originally posted by quanchi112
Lotr has numbers but in terms of power they aren't close to Potter power.
Originally posted by RobtardYour logic says nothing else save Mount Doom can destroy the ring in fiction.
Says who? You. 😂Find me something comparable in HP to Mount Doom and the set conditions and you'd have the beginnings of a valid point, chimpo. Just randomly saying HP >LoTR isn't a proper argument.
Completely different. Mount Doom doesn't destroy the ring on contact.
HP magic is a lot more powerful on screen than Lotr magic. Don't get pissy with me because you're mad over it.
Originally posted by KingD19We only argue movies here. You can't just insert book feats due to fanboyism.
The movies are pretty much directly lifted from the book. It wasn't shown on screen, but we know what happened leading up to the Third Age because it wouldn't be the Third Age if it hadn't happened.You just wank HP so hard it's impossible for you to think they lose.
You cite books and try to cheat due to fanboyism. 😂
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can the Sword of Gryffindor destroy Sauron's ring ?
Originally posted by Lestov16What is the most powerful attack the ring resisted ? What we see the party attempt in destruction of the ring pales in comparison to Potter magic.Were any of those horcruxes forged in a volcano.
The horcruxes have resisted more powerful attacks than the ring on screen. That's the point.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Your logic says nothing else save Mount Doom can destroy the ring in fiction.Completely different. Mount Doom doesn't destroy the ring on contact.
HP magic is a lot more powerful on screen than Lotr magic. Don't get pissy with me because you're mad over it.
Considering I gave a nod to Scarlet Fox in thinking of a plausible way in how the sword could here (something you should be doing), this is you just crying again.
Nope. You have no argument except a general "HP > LoTR" nonsense approach. By your same fail logic, Legolas loses to 1st year Potter.
😂 Yup, just as I said an aimless "HP > LoTR" claim without anything directly supporting that the sword can destroy the One Ring. You need a proper argument, your no limit fallacy of "the sword destroyed a horcrux, ergo it can destroy the One Ring/anything" won't fly, chip.
Originally posted by RobtardLegolas beating a first year student has to do with formidability not overall power. You don't even understand simple logic.
Considering I gave a nod to Scarlet Fox thinking of a plausible way in how the sword could here (something you should be doing), this is you just crying again.Nope. You have no argument except a general "HP > LoTR" nonsense approach. By your same fail logic, Legolas loses to 1st year Potter.
😂 Yup, just as I said an aimless "HP > LoTR" claim without anything directly supporting that the sword can destroy the One Ring. You need a proper argument.
Sword destroyed very durable objects with greater resistance feats than ring. Cry now.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Legolas beating a first year student has to do with formidability not overall power. You don't even understand simple logic.Sword destroyed very durable objects with greater resistance feats than ring. Cry now.
LoL. A dodge. Coward.
The sword only destroyed a horcrux cos it was infused with basilisk venom, something that can destroy horcruxes specifically. You don't even know the basics of your favorite franchise. 😂
The One Ring sat in Mount Doom's lava flow for over a minute before it was destroyed. Horcruxes can be destroyed with Fiend Fyre and AV. Dance some more, clowny, you have nothing and you know it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can the Sword of Gryffindor destroy Sauron's ring ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
What is the most powerful attack the ring resisted ? What we see the party attempt in destruction of the ring pales in comparison to Potter magic.
The only way that argument works is to say that legend was wrong and Mount Doom's magma isn't the weakest thing that can destroy it, which is utterly false. The only other way your argument works is by saying that HP magic can generate heat higher than that of Mount Doom's magma. Again, that's nonsense, even if we considered Mt. Doom's magma temperature to be equivalent to our own, even though it's possibly higher. HP magic has never generated that kind of heat. Also, I guarantee you if you threw Salazar Slytherin's locket into Mount Doom, it would be boiled. So the sword really doesn't have the feats.
EDIT, I forgot the venom thing. Damn. The sword's feats are virtually nonexistent here.
Originally posted by quanchi112
The horcruxes have resisted more powerful attacks than the ring on screen. That's the point.
Um, no. The Only thing that could destroy the ring was the magma of Mount Doom. Is there an HP attack equivalent to the temperature of magma? No.
Originally posted by RobtardNo shit but the sword is empowered to that point so why even bring it up. Sword was still powerful enough to kill a Baslisk even prior to.
LoL. A dodge. Coward.The sword only destroyed a horcrux cos it was infused with basilisk venom, something that can destroy horcruxes specifically. You don't even know the basics of your favorite franchise. 😂
The One Ring sat in Mount Doom's lava flow for over a minute before it was destroyed. Horcruxes can be destroyed with Fiend Fyre and AV. Dance some more, clowny, you have nothing and you know it.
A Horcrux in a living being is obviously not as durable as an object. Anyone with common sense would know this. According to you Harry can't be hurt by spells that couldn't harm the Horcruxes.
When did Fiendfyre destroy a Horcrux ?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can the Sword of Gryffindor destroy Sauron's ring ?
Originally posted by Lestov16Mount Doom is the only way in their universe which doesn't pertain to any other universe. Heat isn't the only way to destroy it IMO. What other feats of resistance does the Ring have ? Even saying a Horcrux burns doesn't prove the sword can't destroy the Ring.
The only way that argument works is to say that legend was wrong and Mount Doom's magma isn't the weakest thing that can destroy it, which is utterly false. The only other way your argument works is by saying that HP magic can generate heat higher than that of Mount Doom's magma. Again, that's nonsense, even if we considered Mt. Doom's magma temperature to be equivalent to our own, even though it's possibly higher. HP magic has never generated that kind of heat. Also, I guarantee you if you threw Salazar Slytherin's locket into Mount Doom, it would be boiled. So the sword really doesn't have the feats.EDIT, I forgot the venom thing. Damn. The sword's feats are virtually nonexistent here.
Um, no. The [b]Only
thing that could destroy the ring was the magma of Mount Doom. Is there an HP attack equivalent to the temperature of magma? No. [/B]
Why wouldn't a Basilisk fang work or for that matter this sword ? What is greatest feat of resistance on screen .
Originally posted by quanchi112
No shit but the sword is empowered to that point so why even bring it up. Sword was still powerful enough to kill a Baslisk even prior to.A Horcrux in a living being is obviously not as durable as an object. Anyone with common sense would know this. According to you Harry can't be hurt by spells that couldn't harm the Horcruxes.
When did Fiendfyre destroy a Horcrux ?
Don't try and pretend like you knew all along when you clearly didn't about the sword and the venom. Basilisk are scared of roosters. So stop wanking.
Another dodge. But glad you admit hat horcrux aren't as durable as the One Ring. So you've got nothing except your "HP > LoTR" blanket nonsense.
Mentioned in one of the films, iirc.
Originally posted by RobtardYes, I did but its hardly relevant since its a part of the swords properties, kiddo.
Don't try and pretend like you knew all along when you clearly didn't about the sword and the venom. Basilisk are scared of roosters. So stop wanking.Another dodge. But glad you admit hat horcrux aren't as durable as the One Ring. So you've got nothing except your "HP > LoTR" blanket nonsense.
Mentioned in one of the films, iirc.
I didn't dodge anything. I for one think they are in the same league. Lotr verse isn't as powerful as Potterverse.
So you have no idea but it didn't destroy one on its own, ignoramus.
Basilisks are very powerful. One basilisk would dominate shit in Lotr.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, I did but its hardly relevant since its a part of the swords properties, kiddo.I didn't dodge anything. I for one think they are in the same league. Lotr verse isn't as powerful as Potterverse.
So you have no idea but it didn't destroy one on its own, ignoramus.
Basilisks are very powerful. One basilisk would dominate shit in Lotr.
Nope. Just come clean.
You did.
Prove it.
Oh, this "HP > LoTR' general fail approach again. How inventive. Yeah, you might want to reword that. You're implying basilisk suck compared to LoTR, dummy.
Originally posted by RobtardYou're ridiculous. You say stupid things. It has the basilisk venom it's a clear power to take on what makes it stronger. Did you think any sword absorbs basilisk venom ? Make some sense.
Nope. Just come clean.You did.
Prove it.
Oh, this "HP > LoTR' general fail approach again. How inventive. Yeah, you might want to reword that. You're implying basilisk suck compared to LoTR, dummy.
Fiendfyre, Shield incineration, One shot kill magic, a basilisk which kills what makes eye contact with it, etc. In Lotr one dragon has Gandalf nervous while in Potter they are used to test young man and kept in chains.
Baslisks are powerful and would take out massive numbers in Lotr.