Originally posted by Intrepid37
As are you. Neither of us have proof for our points, so why did you bring it up?
Have you been sleeping or you suffer from short-term memory loss?
You brought the "most powerful Sith Lord ever" argument in to this debate, and I reminded you that Sidious is no longer exclusive with this accolade and it remains to be seen how Sidious will be positioned/promoted in the light of updated lore which continues to expand. For now, it would be wise for you to put this argument to rest.
Regardless, you just weakened the credibility of your original argument with this revelation:
Plagueis understood, too, that there were no powers beyond his reach; none he couldn't master through an effort of will. If a Sith of equal power had preceded him, then that one had taken his or her secrets to the grave, or had locked them away in holocrons that had been destroyed or had yet to surface. (SW: Plagueis)
"What greater weapon is there than to turn an enemy to your cause? To use their own knowledge against them?" (Bastila Shan)
Originally posted by Intrepid37
More durable than twelve armored maladians?
I don't know but T3-M4 was heavily customized (as per kOTOR-CG) and very durable:
An instant later, the little astromech came tumbling down the stairs and bounced across the floor as if he'd been shot from a cannon. He landed in the corner on his back, his wheels still spinning. (SWTOR: Revan)
T3-M4 wasn't damaged...
A human would have ended with broken bones in T3-M4's place, armor or not...
Originally posted by Intrepid37
No. It's not my job to prove Vitiate is fast, it's yours and so far you haven't done a very good job at it.
Nice escape attempt! It is your job to prove that Anakin is going to blitz Vitiate because you made this claim in the first place. My contention is that Force powers can be unleashed instantly.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Others Plagueis felled with his hands by snapping necks and putting his fists through armored torsos.In blinding motion his hands and feet smashed skulls and windpipes.
I meant with a lightsaber.
Whether Plagueis is a physical brute and/or a master swordsman is not going to give him edge over Vitiate who is known to overwhelm foes with similar advantages over him with his power in the Force. Use your brain, please.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Plagueis understood, too, that there were no powers beyond his reach; none he couldn't master through an effort of will. If a Sith of equal power had preceded him, then that one had taken his or her secrets to the grave, or had locked them away in holocrons that had been destroyed or had yet to surface.
Interesting information; this nullifies your attempts to belittle Plagueis against Sidious as well.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
So where are we getting with this?
You tell me...
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Your double standards are annoying.
🙄
My point is that EXPERT/SUPERB swordsmen existed during TOR era also; why are you arguing against this? Your double-standards are actually annoying.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
He was lucky Sidious faked the part of being too weak, otherwise he'd eat his own saber.
Speculation continues at your end...
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Proves nothing.Proves nothing.
Your responses prove that you are a stubborn jerk. Canonical sources offer conflicting accounts of Mace's confrontation with Sidious; the account demonstrated in the movie is the one with wider acceptance within Star Wars (canon) literature.
ROTS movie + SWTCE + SWTERC versus ROTS novel
NOTE: Sources on the left favor Mace.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
😐Mace was forced back on the defensive the whole time until he gained an advantage he wouldn't gain in a rematch. His feat is really no better than Dooku holding his own against Yoda.
Giving space is not necessarily a sign of being outclassed but rather a tactic employed to avoid getting injured or killed specially in a restricted setting. If Sidious had forced Mace to his knees then you would have a point but the opposite happened. In the movie, Mace disarmed Sidious by landing a boot on him.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
His feat is really no better than Dooku holding his own against Yoda.
"What did you say?" (Anakin Skywalker)
Sidious was so skilled that he outdueled both Maul and Opress simultaneously. In contrast, Dooku couldn't outduel Opress and Ventress simultaneously. Replace Ventress with Maul and the brothers would have overwhelmed Dooku. Mace outdueled Sidious when 3 other Jedi Masters couldn't and even the brothers couldn't. Your brain needs a CT scan.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
The Complete Visual Dictionary was re-released in September 2012 and includes this quote:Beyond the vision of the Jedi Knights, somewhere within the darkness, the greatest master of evil ever to use Sith power bides his time. As his strength grows, his plans begin to shape the course of the galaxy, and his snares await the unsuspecting.
Too bad! This book:
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-The-Republic-Encyclopedia/dp/0756698391 - have been released a month later.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
No problem. You concede the point?
I accept that Yoda > Dooku
Originally posted by Intrepid37
I know what he's capable of and he's not capable of taking down Dooku more times than not.
What a joke you really are.
He outclassed Dooku in this footage alone: http://www.swtor.com/info/media/trailers/return
Originally posted by Intrepid37
On Tatooine, The Clone Wars: The Visual Guide implies Dooku brought up the holocron to ''gain an advantage'' implying his force powers did nothing.
I don't understand?
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Ventress brought down stones from a ceiling,
Link?
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Kenobi stalemated Pre-Suit Vader in their force push.
Pre-Suit Vader have better showings with the Force then Dooku?
Originally posted by Intrepid37
This contradits nothing. Just because neither the novel nor movie says it doesn't mean other sources can; I have cited one that does, concede and move on.
Anakin was vulnerable when Obi-Wan reached higher ground. Their is no sign or indication of any other vulnerability.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Prove the Jedi were on Dooku's level.
I am not in the mood to start another lengthy debate with you! I will shorten the argument: Their combined might would be significantly greater then that of (single) Dooku's so your argument is moot. Furthermore, HoT is among these Jedi and he have singlehandedly defeated very impressive foes.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Only then can we understand the extraordinary combat moves of Yoda, perhaps the greatest lightsaber master the Jedi Order has ever seen.
He is better duelist then even Luke?
The key word is "perhaps" in that statement.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
There's really no shame in that.
No! But it is shameful that he couldn't overcome other less capable duelists then Yoda.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Nick Gillard confirmed Kenobi was a level 8, Anakin and Mace were level 9's. Guess what, Dooku is an equal to Mace.
Friendly sparring contests prove nothing.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Thanks for proving how good Anakin is.
Obi-Wan is in the same boat, did you forget? Obi-Wan have dueled the brothers and survived.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Dooku disarmed Savage twice.
This is prior to Dooku's confrontation with both Opress and Ventress or after?
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Not really. Dooku holding his own for a good 30 seconds against perhaps the best lightsaber duelist the Order ever had seen is well above Nyriss.
Baseless!
Outdueling too EXPERT duelists > Dooku lasting 30 seconds against one EXPERT duelist
SCOURGE WAS AN EXPERT SWORDSMAN; at the Academy even the instructors had been reluctant to face him in the training ring. When the dark side flowed through him, his blade was more than a weapon. It became an extension of his will. (SWTOR: Revan)