as simple as that would be, and as much as it would amuse me to do so, your attempt to bait me into cross-forum bickering is a failure. 🙂
though im surprised that the comically self-defeating nature of having to ask for 3 examples as opposed to 1 went over your head before you chose to post that request 🙂
maybe you should try accepting that you have zero authority here. (until you buy kmc from raz, of course lol) ...and as any mod would likely tell you (on any forum, really), the proper response for any breach of forum rules is the report function, as opposed to your typical practice of to feigning authority and telling others how they should behave. 🙂
Originally posted by focus4chumps
as simple as that would be, and as much as it would amuse me to do so, your attempt to bait me into cross-forum bickering is a failure. 🙂
"I would prove it but I just don't want to, man."
Originally posted by focus4chumps
though im surprised that the comically self-defeating nature of having to ask for 3 examples as opposed to 1 went over your head before you chose to post that request 🙂
If you weren't so butthurt over the request, you'd realize that I asked for at least 3 because you said "countless." For me, 3 is the threshold. If it was just one, lol. If it was two, you would have said a couple. I can settle with three being "countless." But, keep pretending my comment was self-defeating when I even highlighted, in your post, the absurdity.
Originally posted by focus4chumps
maybe you should try accepting that you have zero authority here. (until you buy kmc from raz, of course lol) ...and as any mod would likely tell you (on any forum, really), the proper response for any breach of forum rules is the report function, as opposed to your typical practice of to feigning authority and telling others how they should behave. 🙂
So we are back to me "telling" people how to behave, eh? lol
Edit - Go post in the relevant GDF thread. Why is the ol' "purchase KMC" a laughable fantasy?
Originally posted by Darkstorm ZeroFalse. Khan destroyed Spock in one on one combat. You're misrepresenting or leaving out the context of his gf showing up with 8 blasts as well as Spock then taking a weapon to a stunned Khan.
Considering Khan got bested by someone with far less impressive capabilities, you've no room to make that kind of call.But please, do go on and continue to make a spectacle of yourself.
Don't you dare ever try a stunt like this again.
Originally posted by XanatosForeverYou conceded.
Choosing not to comment on irrelevant statements in a debate is not a concession.If people were not missing him, then he would have been hurt. That is the direct consequence of being shot. This is never shown to occur. By this very simple fact, it would make you the liar, not I. Thank you for agreeing that stealth was not the intended objective of the assault on the temple.
So you are now arguing that Khan would simple squeeze the trigger and never let go? That would mean he blasts the ground by his feet, if not hitting his foot directly, on the upswing. This would throw him off balance, which would result in his aim going off-target. Not that any of this matters, as Yoda would already be in the process of taking off Khan's head.
Khan leaping up to a senate pod is a bad idea. Yoda's decapitation strike would instead become a bisection.
I can only assume this statement is referring to your next debate. You really should consider ending one before beginning another.
He blocked the shots. They did not miss they were blocked. If Yoda stood there he would have died. He can shoot and jump at the same time as proven by the clip itself. Watch the clip since your acting like Khan can't shoot the wings off a fly with his accuracy in he clip.
False. Yoda can't jump as far as Khan and doesn't have the luxury of using a long ranged weapon while doing so.
Hush, little baby.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded.He blocked the shots. They did not miss they were blocked. If Yoda stood there he would have died. He can shoot and jump at the same time as proven by the clip itself. Watch the clip since your acting like Khan can't shoot the wings off a fly with his accuracy in he clip.
False. Yoda can't jump as far as Khan and doesn't have the luxury of using a long ranged weapon while doing so.
Hush, little baby.
Did you miss what I said the first time? Allow me to repeat myself with emphasis: Choosing not to comment on irrelevant statements in a debate is not a concession.
Your stance requires that Yoda to act in a way he did not. If he stood there...but he did not stand there, and thus he did not get hit.
I had actually been refraining from making this point, because I was hoping you would realize your own mistake, but I can see now that will not be happening. Khan did indeed hit his targets in that scene, but it was not from precise, single round volleys. His weapon fired in bursts at most, and there were multiple points where the crimson blasts signifying his shots are nowhere near what would be his intended target. Khan is not the impossible sniper you believe him to be. He is good, but not that good.
Yoda does not have to jump as far as Khan. He only needs to A) jump faster (which he can do), and B) intercept his trajectory (which he can also do). Even if Khan avoids a deathblow from Yoda's lightsaber, he will at the very least lose an appendage, likely a leg or two. Alternatively, Yoda could impale Khan with a saber throw as Khan is landing on a pod.
That is condescending, and just plain rude. Please mind your manners.
Originally posted by XanatosForeveryou conceded and I accepted.
Did you miss what I said the first time? Allow me to repeat myself with emphasis: [b]Choosing not to comment on irrelevant statements in a debate is not a concession.Your stance requires that Yoda to act in a way he did not. If he stood there...but he did not stand there, and thus he did not get hit.
I had actually been refraining from making this point, because I was hoping you would realize your own mistake, but I can see now that will not be happening. Khan did indeed hit his targets in that scene, but it was not from precise, single round volleys. His weapon fired in bursts at most, and there were multiple points where the crimson blasts signifying his shots are nowhere near what would be his intended target. Khan is not the impossible sniper you believe him to be. He is good, but not that good.
Yoda does not have to jump as far as Khan. He only needs to A) jump faster (which he can do), and B) intercept his trajectory (which he can also do). Even if Khan avoids a deathblow from Yoda's lightsaber, he will at the very least lose an appendage, likely a leg or two. Alternatively, Yoda could impale Khan with a saber throw as Khan is landing on a pod.
That is condescending, and just plain rude. Please mind your manners. [/B]
He stood there initially and blocked his way to find the opening to defeat them. He did not outmaneuver any laser fire.
He did not miss one time. He is better at everything. This was the clear intention of the film makers. Khan was a crackshot in combat.
What makes you say so ? You still have not proven he can block the über gun. Khan is more than what Yoda has faced.
Relax.