Defense of Marriage Act 'Struck Down 5-4' By Supreme Court

Originally posted by Robtard
Is it the buttsex?

Which parts/what exactly is it that you do not like of 'homosexual culture'?

It's the fashion sense... there is such a a thing as being too fashionable.

Honestly it's the near automatic support of all leftist ideals. The constant forcing of acceptance of homosexuality, that not only do you have to be tolerant but you better damn love it. How many base their entire lives around their sexuality instead it being just another facet of who they are.

These may seem like small issues to some of you but I can promise that these reasons together is what causes 90% of the vitriol that's lobbed at homosexuals. I'm sure that there are people who actually hate homosexuals but WBC is a very small minority of people.

Originally posted by dadudemon
If you have a friend that you like everything about them, I say you found your soul-mate. If there are things you don't like about your friends, I'd say you're normal.

How many of your friends regularly do things that utterly disgust you and a part of a conspiracy to destroy American culture? Why do you think the number is as high or low as it is?

Originally posted by Cyner
I'm sure that there are people who actually hate homosexuals but WBC is a very small minority of people.

Woah, now you're the one being judgmental of homophobes. WBC doesn't hate homosexuals, its GOD who hates gays. Nothing they can do about that.

There is no such thing as being too fashionable.

Originally posted by Cyner
It's the fashion sense... there is such a a thing as being too fashionable.

Honestly it's the near automatic support of all leftist ideals. The constant forcing of acceptance of homosexuality, that not only do you have to be tolerant but you better damn love it. How many base their entire lives around their sexuality instead it being just another facet of who they are.

These may seem like small issues to some of you but I can promise that these reasons together is what causes 90% of the vitriol that's lobbed at homosexuals. I'm sure that there are people who actually hate homosexuals but WBC is a very small minority of people.

It's not hard to figure out why they overwhelmingly support liberal politics when conservative politicians and organizations are heavily invested in "family values" based politics that treats gays as either subhuman or pitiable deviants that need to have their souls cleansed.

And what about the advertisements, movies, tv shows, songs, and literature that celebrate heterosexuality? This is the "heteronormativity" that modern critics love to point out. For every bit of "homosexual propaganda" you might come across I can guarantee there will be a hundred more examples of "heterosexual propaganda" on tv, on the internet, and in magazines before you go to bed.

Originally posted by Cyner
Honestly it's the near automatic support of all leftist ideals. The constant forcing of acceptance of homosexuality, that not only do you have to be tolerant but you better damn love it. How many base their entire lives around their sexuality instead it being just another facet of who they are.

These may seem like small issues to some of you but I can promise that these reasons together is what causes 90% of the vitriol that's lobbed at homosexuals.

DDM, will you continue to white knight someone who just said homosexuals are responsible for 90% of the hate they receive in society?

Originally posted by Cyner
Honestly it's the near automatic support of all leftist ideals.

So then it makes no sense to say you dislike homosexual culture, you just hate liberalism. That's a vastly more accurate and useful way of describing your views.

Problem solved: You're just a moron. (But don't worry it's only your beliefs and the ways you express them that I think are stupid, I'm sure you're totally smart)

He probably hates blacks and latinos too. Not to mention the state of Massachusetts.

Originally posted by Cyner
It's the fashion sense... there is such a a thing as being too fashionable.

Honestly it's the near automatic support of all leftist ideals. The constant forcing of acceptance of homosexuality, that not only do you have to be tolerant but you better damn love it. How many base their entire lives around their sexuality instead it being just another facet of who they are.

These may seem like small issues to some of you but I can promise that these reasons together is what causes 90% of the vitriol that's lobbed at homosexuals. I'm sure that there are people who actually hate homosexuals but WBC is a very small minority of people.

So you dislike "leftist" too. Shocking. Do you think it's possible that if homosexuality wasn't looked down upon and that if gay discrimination didn't exist, no one would be "forcing" you to not be a bigot? I don't know, how many do that? Why do you care what other people do when it's not affecting you?

They should be non issues, which is the point. Gays shouldn't have had to claw and fight for equality, no more than black people should have had and still have to in some areas. You're aware that homosexuals being prosecuted goes way back and it isn't a 20th/21st century thing, yes? Cos what you said is outright silly.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not to mention the state of Massachusetts.

it's the glove shape, isn't it...

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
How many of your friends regularly do things that utterly disgust you and a part of a conspiracy to destroy American culture? Why do you think the number is as high or low as it is?

Do you think his friend does that? Do you think Cyner thinks that of every single homosexual (regardless of his obvious troll blanket statement)?

Originally posted by Oliver North
DDM, will you continue to white knight someone who just said homosexuals are responsible for 90% of the hate they receive in society?

I'm not sure I've white-knighted him when:

1. I indirectly called him a closet homo.

2. Summed up his arguments by indirectly calling him a conservatard.

I just disagreed with your characterization. I don't think sexuality can be painted to as broadly define a person as you were doing of his position.

Originally posted by Oliver North
it's the glove shape, isn't it...

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm not sure I've white-knighted him when:

1. I indirectly called him a closet homo.

2. Summed up his arguments by indirectly calling him a conservatard.

I just disagreed with your characterization. I don't think sexuality can be painted to as broadly define a person as you were doing of his position.

touche

EDIT: I hardly think I've suggested that a person is defined by their sexuality though

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I think it's shaped more like a pistol, or a man in robes raising a pickaxe over his head. Or a squarish octopus.

haha, I'm just confused about geography...

Originally posted by dadudemon
Do you think his friend does that? Do you think Cyner thinks that of every single homosexual (regardless of his obvious troll blanket statement)

That is how Cyner defines gay culture. I only know about Cyner's thoughts from what we tells us. You can speculate all you like but that's all it is, speculation. If you're okay with just making up thoughts for Cyner to have can I say that he obviously would like to shoot up some building in Harlem?

Originally posted by Oliver North
EDIT: I hardly think I've suggested that a person is defined by their sexuality though

I try not to making sweeping conclusions made from tongue-in-cheek/troll-ish comments. It makes conversations with people go more smoothly.

Some of you are definitely manipulating what I say to fit what you think I said.

I'm definitely not a conservatard though.

Originally posted by Cyner
I'm definitely not a conservatard though.

lulz

I apologize.

"I only know about Cyner's thoughts from what we tells us."

So I just assumed since you espoused the conservatardy beliefs and ideas regarding homosexuality and "libtard" culture, I just assumed you shared more ideas with conservatards.

I am become the monster I just protested!* 🙁

*Basically, I'm a hypocrite for citicizing the sweeping conclusions made about your posts because I just did the same thing. 😐

Originally posted by dadudemon
I try not to making sweeping conclusions made from tongue-in-cheek/troll-ish comments. It makes conversations with people go more smoothly.

/shrug

I hardly think I can be criticized for taking what Cyner said as a representation for what he believes.

Additionally, it seems more like he will say something ridiculous, people will respond to it, and you will come back with "but he could have meant this", at which point Cyner begins to dick ride your clarification because it makes him look less ridiculous.

Originally posted by Cyner
Some of you are definitely manipulating what I say to fit what you think I said.

if many people aren't getting your position straight, it is more likely something you are doing wrong