Originally posted by juggernaut74
What pisses me off is that we get 3-4 Marvel films a year and we're lucky if we get 1 DC film a year. Next they're gonna cancel the Flash TV show.
We don't get 3-4 Marvel movies a year from Marvel. At most we get TWO.
When Iron Man and Hulk came out, it was another TWO YEARS before we got more Marvel movies.
The X-Men and Spidey ones are made by different companies at little financial cost to Marvel. WB doesn't have that luxury.
DC now, is where Marvel was after Iron Man 1. Except that DC has to be more careful, as if the films suck, they take more of the hit. Once they get a solid base going, we'll see more DC films for sure.
Originally posted by -Pr-
We don't get 3-4 Marvel movies a year from Marvel. At most we get TWO.When Iron Man and Hulk came out, it was another TWO YEARS before we got more Marvel movies.
The X-Men and Spidey ones are made by different companies at little financial cost to Marvel. WB doesn't have that luxury.
DC now, is where Marvel was after Iron Man 1. Except that DC has to be more careful, as if the films suck, they take more of the hit. Once they get a solid base going, we'll see more DC films for sure.
Except DC doesn't seem to have a good plan, like marvel did after Iron Man.
What DC is doing now is equivalent to marvel putting cap and Thor in Iron Man 2 without previous solo movies.
The only reason there plan won't fail is because Wonder Woman and Batman sell themselves.
DC has terrible management
Originally posted by Firefly218
Except DC doesn't seem to have a good plan, like marvel did after Iron Man.What DC is doing now is equivalent to marvel putting cap and Thor in Iron Man 2 without previous solo movies.
The only reason there plan won't fail is because Wonder Woman and Batman sell themselves.
DC has terrible management
DC right now, is where Marvel was when Iron Man 1 came out. They're just starting.
Is it a great idea to put three characters in one movie? No, but but it builds interest. If Affleck is received well as Batman, he'll most likely get a solo movie. Same with Gadot as Diana.
Originally posted by -Pr-
DC right now, is where Marvel was when Iron Man 1 came out. They're just starting.
They're not anymore. They're already a year behind. 3 years after IM and TIH we'd also had IM2, Captain America and Thor. We were then all hyped and ready for The Avengers which came out the next year.
3 years after MOS all we're getting is MOS2 with Batman and WW slot in that movie.
They need to begin production on at least one other solo movie for 2015/2016.
Originally posted by -Pr-
If Affleck is received well as Batman, he'll most likely get a solo movie. Same with Gadot as Diana.
That's fine as long as they do that before any JL team up. WW is more important Imo since we've had loads of Batman in recent years.
But the guy above is right, in that if they jump straight into JL after this, then that would be the equivalent of Marvel having no Cap or Thor movie until after The Avengers, and just introducing them in IM2 before hand.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
They're not anymore. They're already a year behind. 3 years after IM and TIH we'd also had IM2, Captain America and Thor. We were then all hyped and ready for The Avengers which came out the next year.3 years after MOS all we're getting is MOS2 with Batman and WW slot in that movie.
They need to begin production on at least one other solo movie for 2015/2016.
That's fine as long as they do that before any JL team up. WW is more important Imo since we've had loads of Batman in recent years.
But the guy above is right, in that if they jump straight into JL after this, then that would be the equivalent of Marvel having no Cap or Thor movie until after The Avengers, and just introducing them in IM2 before hand.
I don't agree that they're behind, and if they are, it's by one character and one alone.
I honestly don't want them to jump in to it straight away. It would be a huge mistake, imo, to go for Justice League without a couple of solo movies for at the very least, Bruce and Diana.
Hell, the Batman and Diana movies could have cameos too. Stick Aquaman in the Wonder Woman movoie, and any of Flash, GL or even J'onn in the Batman one. Even as cameos, it would help substantially imo.
Originally posted by Golgo13
There is no such thing as their behind. It's not a race and just because you say they need one more movie doesn't make it true. They can spin solo movies after a JL movie, which I think will work.
That will help the solo movies for sure. But I don't see why people will be so into the idea of a JL movie right after a Superman/Batman/Wonder Woman trio movie.
That's the movie people will be more interested in. That's the movie people are hyped for since we've seen plenty of great solo movies for Superman and Batman. And because Wonder Woman is also well known.
JL then would just be like a sequel to that with more heroes added. Kind of like Avengers 2 with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch added.
Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't agree that they're behind, and if they are, it's by one character and one alone.
Actually your right they're not behind on characters (I completely forgot we have a GL movie).
Originally posted by -Pr-
I honestly don't want them to jump in to it straight away. It would be a huge mistake, imo, to go for Justice League without a couple of solo movies for at the very least, Bruce and Diana.Hell, the Batman and Diana movies could have cameos too. Stick Aquaman in the Wonder Woman movoie, and any of Flash, GL or even J'onn in the Batman one. Even as cameos, it would help substantially imo.
👆
Agreed but honestly Batman sells himself at this point. So even just a Wonder Woman movie would do wonders (no pun intended) for a potential JL.
And if they can do cameos in MOS2 and WW like they did for BW in IM2, then that'd be pretty perfect.
I still like the original rumors of Superman/Batman, then The Flash and then JL.
Who knows maybe they'll still do that.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
That will help the solo movies for sure. But I don't see why people will be so into the idea of a JL movie right after a Superman/Batman/Wonder Woman trio movie.That's the movie people will be more interested in. That's the movie people are hyped for since we've seen plenty of great solo movies for Superman and Batman. And because Wonder Woman is also well known.
JL then would just be like a sequel to that with more heroes added. Kind of like Avengers 2 with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch added.
Actually your right they're not behind on characters (I completely forgot we have a GL movie).
👆
Agreed but honestly Batman sells himself at this point. So even just a Wonder Woman movie would do wonders (no pun intended) for a potential JL.
And if they can do cameos in MOS2 and WW like they did for BW in IM2, then that'd be pretty perfect.
I'd be fine. I just feel like the Justice League, more-so than the Avengers, has more people that can individually carry a movie, so solo movies are just as, if not more important than they were for Marvel.
Originally posted by -Pr-
I'd be fine. I just feel like the Justice League, more-so than the Avengers, has more people that can individually carry a movie, so solo movies are just as, if not more important than they were for Marvel.
Of course they are. In fact the JL members are/were actually more well known (at least pre-IM). But maybe that's the problem. WB thinks they can get away with all the big names selling themselves in a team movie.
Probably would work too. Just don't expect 3rd biggest movie of all time if they do it that way though.
That's true but they were building up the shared universe during that wait. They weren't just making us wait and wait for the next step in the shared universe franchise like WB seems to be doing.
But I'm hoping the set back is due to some really amazing new stuff they're trying to work out. And I'm hoping we get another DC solo outing by that year too. And I'm hoping when Justice League finally comes its going to be the most entertaining comic book movie to date. It certainly has the potential to be.