They could've have chosen Walter White and everyone would say it sucked too.
I'm expecting the sequel to tank now, regardless of whether or not it's a bad movie, but just because of a nationwide circlejerk.
Originally posted by JayDaDon
What the hell is WRONG with them? Is the concept of choosing actors that inspire EXCITEMENT for the movie totally lost on them?
lol
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Nah, saying "waaaah no matter what actor is cast people will hate the movie waaah" is a strawman.
Why do you think that WB's horrible casting choices shouldn't be criticized?
Eisenberg I think is an awful choice. The overall point is people like you are prone to sucking each other's dicks to the point where every decision is horrible. It gets annoying to read page after page of cock sucking. That's all I meant. You getting visibly annoyed that I'm not sucking your dick just shows how bad it's gotten.
Originally posted by ares834
Yeah, it a horrible choice. Don't get me wrong, Eisenberg is a talented actor but I can't see him portraying Luthor at all.Welp, my enthusiasm for this movie has now tanked... lol.
It's surprising, but I find it interesting. It's not the first time an actor in the same age range as the Superman actor has been cast; didn't everyone like Michael Rosenbaum as Lex on Smallville? I think they saw Jesse Eisenberg doing a darker version of his Mark Zuckerberg character as Lex. I can see the government turning to the smartest scientist in the country to find weaknesses in Superman, and the project becoming an obsession for him.
I'd also like to see Lex & Bruce Wayne having some business relationship, right out of Brian Azzarello's Luthor: Man Of Steel, which would put them on the same side against Superman early on.
Originally posted by Based
Did you spend all this time looking what a strawman is? Cause you butchered it. Google it again.Eisenberg I think is an awful choice. The overall point is people like you are prone to sucking each other's dicks to the point where every decision is horrible. It gets annoying to read page after page of cock sucking. That's all I meant. You getting visibly annoyed that I'm not sucking your dick just shows how bad it's gotten.
So you admit that WB has made awful casting choices.
Yet you're buttmad that people are complaining about those awful casting choices.
So basically, you're bitching just to *****. 👆
Originally posted by Tzeentch
[B]So you admit that WB has made awful casting choices.
Only Eisenberg. The "s" you put after choice means plural. Since I only said Eisenberg sucked that's singular. Gadot is fine. Affleck is fine. Cavill is already good.
Yet you're buttmad that people are complaining about those awful casting choices.
I'm annoyed over your cock sucking as I've said multiple times.
So basically, you're bitching just to *****. 👆
All your posts ***** about every fictional thing ever. "Wah Bleach sucks but let me make my avatar and signature about it." Do you, boo but don't be a hypocrite now.
Originally posted by BasedWhat about Gal Gadot makes you think she's a good choice for Wonder Woman?
Only Eisenberg. The "s" you put after choice means plural. Since I only said Eisenberg sucked that's singular. Gadot is fine. Affleck is fine. Cavill is already good.
I'm annoyed over your cock sucking as I've said multiple times.Cry about it.
All your posts ***** about every fictional thing ever.lol
The difference between Ledger, who I was wrong about when he was cast, and Eisenberg is that Ledger already had a body of work that showed off his acting range. Everytime I have seen Eisenberg in something he has been a geeky young kid... no range. THAT'S the difference there.
As for the other castings, only Jeremy Irons seems solid. Gadot was cast as such an important character, not just in the comic book world, but for women of Earth. Here's Wonder Woman FINALLY being put on the big screen and it's going to a girl who will succumb to the weight being put on, not only her but, the entire production. I'm an Affleck fan so I will give them that one. Cavill was fine, not great just adequate.
If they don't put a script together that covers up the obvious defeciencies in this movie, this may go down as the Hindenberg of movies. Golgo, not even you, and your apparent bankroll from DC, can argue that.
But like I said, I am really rooting for this movie to make me eat my words. DC needs this to compete, they're just not able to due to the fact that they don't have their own studios like Marvel. I don't blame DC, I blame the movie studio.
P.E.A.C.E.
Just going to mirror what I said in the other thread:
Originally posted by -Pr-
There are some versions of Lex he fits pretty well, so I'm interested at the very least to see what they can do with it.Jeremy Irons as Alfred though? Yes please.
For anyone that can't see him as Lex Luthor... Really?
Originally posted by SpaceMonkey
The difference between Ledger, who I was wrong about when he was cast, and Eisenberg is that Ledger already had a body of work that showed off his acting range. Everytime I have seen Eisenberg in something he has been a geeky young kid... no range. THAT'S the difference there.As for the other castings, only Jeremy Irons seems solid. Gadot was cast as such an important character, not just in the comic book world, but for women of Earth. Here's Wonder Woman FINALLY being put on the big screen and it's going to a girl who will succumb to the weight being put on, not only her but, the entire production. I'm an Affleck fan so I will give them that one. Cavill was fine, not great just adequate.
If they don't put a script together that covers up the obvious defeciencies in this movie, this may go down as the Hindenberg of movies. Golgo, not even you, and your apparent bankroll from DC, can argue that.
But like I said, I am really rooting for this movie to make me eat my words. DC needs this to compete, they're just not able to due to the fact that they don't have their own studios like Marvel. I don't blame DC, I blame the movie studio.
P.E.A.C.E.
not being snarky, but you need to see more of his work then.
Originally posted by SpaceMonkey'
The difference between Ledger, who I was wrong about when he was cast, and Eisenberg is that Ledger already had a body of work that showed off his acting range. Everytime I have seen Eisenberg in something he has been a geeky young kid... no range. THAT'S the difference there.As for the other castings, only Jeremy Irons seems solid. Gadot was cast as such an important character, not just in the comic book world, but for women of Earth. Here's Wonder Woman FINALLY being put on the big screen and it's going to a girl who will succumb to the weight being put on, not only her but, the entire production. I'm an Affleck fan so I will give them that one. Cavill was fine, not great just adequate.
If they don't put a script together that covers up the obvious defeciencies in this movie, this may go down as the Hindenberg of movies. Golgo, not even you, and your apparent bankroll from DC, can argue that.
But like I said, I am really rooting for this movie to make me eat my words. DC needs this to compete, they're just not able to due to the fact that they don't have their own studios like Marvel. I don't blame DC, I blame the movie studio.
P.E.A.C.E.
Jesse has been nominated for MULTIPLE awards, which includes the Oscars. He has a strong body of work.
Originally posted by Golgo13
Social Network? BTW, a lot of people never saw Heath as Joker, either.
Perhaps he will surprise me. But as of now I can't see Eisenberg being threatening or even mature enough for Lex.
Originally posted by Based
They could've have chosen Walter White and everyone would say it sucked too.
Bull shit. I would be ecstatic.