ODG
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feats vs Logic
Originally posted by curryman
Sam's example isn't a made up feat.Superman's not mentally retarded, and he can move girders and weld stuff at a gazillion times the speed of comics. Naturally he should be able to punch at that same speed.
That's not theorycraft with a powerset.
I see a distinction between CIS-free and whatever you want to call powerset mode.
If that scene causes you so much trouble, then you shoud note that he accomplished that while being amped under a blue sun.
Originally posted by curryman
I'm glad to see your edited your post to make it a bit angrier.Time to lay off the projection.
I don't see what Thor has to do with this, nor do I see where you get the idea that I have an irrational attitude towards Thor. Is that attitude for or against him?
Is this because I ridiculed your "Hulk can never lose" post?
My dismissive thoughts towards your pointless "quote" of me isn't anger or projection. Next time someone throws your own comment back in your face, don't blame him.
And the mention of Thor has little to do with you, as I was responding to wolverinos, not you. Reread it.
ODG
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feats vs Logic
Originally posted by wolverinos
if something i said was wrong, please enlighten me.
I already did.
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
I disagree on one thing- The idea of Superman punching in such a fashion is no more theoretical than me saying if I push you off a bridge, you will fall in the water. He can do it whether it has actually been shown on panel or not.
The idea that Superman can instantly defeat a Hulk-level foe with thousands of punches within a second is theoretical. Because it's never happened before. I can assume Thor can also command Mjolnir to blitz Hulk thousands of times at ftl speeds also to instantly defeat him. But he's never actually done it, so who cares? Hell, why can't Thor quickly summon galaxy-rending mystic whirlwinds too based on him once containing a 1/5th universe destroying blast once with those whirlwinds? Because he's never actually done that, so who cares?
Why should I care about what Superman has never done before on-panel? When there is a wealth of feats he's actually performed and a wealth of fights that he's fought? We are talking about thousands of issues of published fiction to draw from and there seems to be this attitude that this somehow isn't enough.
What I have seen is dozens of instances where Superman rushes an opponent with a flurry of punches. And rarely, if ever, do I see it result in more than a staggering of the Hulk-class foe. And there have been times where it kinda gets no-sold. That suggests something. And while that "something" may not align with preconceived notions, it's not like it's based on nothing.
It's based on comics.
H1A
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Feats vs Logic
Originally posted by ODG
I already did. The idea that Superman can instantly defeat a Hulk-level foe with thousands of punches within a second is theoretical. Because it's never happened before. I can assume Thor can also command Mjolnir to blitz Hulk thousands of times at ftl speeds also to instantly defeat him. But he's never actually done it, so who cares? Hell, why can't Thor quickly summon galaxy-rending mystic whirlwinds too based on him once containing a 1/5th universe destroying blast once with those whirlwinds? Because he's never actually done that, so who cares?Why should I care about what Superman has never done before on-panel? When there is a wealth of feats he's actually performed and a wealth of fights that he's fought? We are talking about thousands of issues of published fiction to draw from and there seems to be this attitude that this somehow isn't enough.
What I have seen is dozens of instances where Superman rushes an opponent with a flurry of punches. And rarely, if ever, do I see it result in more than a staggering of the Hulk-class foe. And there have been times where it kinda gets no-sold. That suggests something. And while that "something" may not align with preconceived notions, it's not like it's based on nothing.
It's based on comics.
In reality Superman can't hit Hulk with thousands of punches in one second to ko him. This is because Hulk will most likely get sent flying from a punch hard enough to rock him. But if Hulk was glued to an adamantium wall then Superman could do it. Superman has the speed and the power to do such things.
But can Thor do something vs. will he do it is two different things.
It takes logic and common sense to know whether someone can do something based off their power set and what they have done in comics. It takes reading comics and learning the character to know would they choose or be able to think of such things to do.