The Greatest Foe the darkness had ever known...

Started by SIDIOUS 6631 pages

Whoa! That's a lot to respond to and I've been very busy lately so don't expect any time too soon. Maybe within a week or so.

But I'll address your first point. And I repeat again, there is no contradiction. I'm not exactly clueless as to what I read, therefore I don't need to be on your level at understanding literature as a whole to be better at judging who would win in a vs forum. All I need to be better at is judging fighters based on their performances, and/or the circumstance/context surrounding their performance, which I am. I can also be better at applying fighting mechanics in a vs forum based on what I read or see (in this particular thread we're arguing on what we see onscreen). Do you understand now?

BTW, I appreciation your lecturing on swordfighting. lol

Also, you should have re-read my comment on the Sidious vs Maul&Savage fight before you responded to it. You just made a fool of yourself, as I never denied any of the times Sidious used the force (read it again). And lol @ comparing Kenobi's performance to Sidious's. You clearly don't have my grasp of context when it comes to fights, and you'll see why when I respond to all of that.

I believe Tempest has a quote that isn't from Gillard proclaiming Sidious as a master of all lightsaber forms, which I recall him mentioning recently.....

Nai
Hell. Even if we would accept the notion that Sidious is master of all forms, despite of the fact, that pretty much every available source does contradict that notion.

Nai
And I don't hold any bias against the character of Sidious

Ninja'd by Neph

Let me point out that 'mastery' is not a level of combat ability. It means you know the moves of a style in and out and can teach it to others, but someone can be a master at relatively low combat abilities, and one master can be much much stronger in an actual fight than another.

And being a master of more styles certainly doesn't automatically mean better than mastery of one. You can still only do the same amount of moves, after all, and unless someone is particularly bad against some style, the ability to switch around doesn't help much.

Palps certainly knows all the styles, but I'm pretty sure he mostly just uses one. Ditto Yoda, he fairly exclusively fights with just one. Anakin too. And Dooku.

Yeah, someone with mastery over multiple forms can be defeated by someone with superior speed or strength, and vice versa. After all, Anakin defeated Dooku by enhancing his strength through focus rage.

Sidious having mastery over every form speaks for his technical ability, and added to his force enhanced speed and strength, this makes him a saber beast by default. Speed, strength and technical skill all play an equal roll in a saber duel. Why Nai chooses to separate Sidious' speed from his saber ability is completely beyond me. The fact that Sidious has such speed and precision to slaughter swordsmasters before they can react, makes him that much more impressive. But I guess to Nai, Sidious having to apply his superior force powers to enhance his physicality during a saber duel, takes away the impressiveness. IDK.

BTW, I'm tempted to respond to Nai's arguments now that I have time, but I'm too lazy right now, and I'm still deciding whether or not to respond to it all point by point.

And even if you only have one form, if it suits you, you may be better off always using it than any of the others that don't suit you well. Obi-wan beat foes he was neither faster or stronger than, with his one form he just focused on the most.

A whole lot of the best duelists were effectively mono-form in practice.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66

Sidious having mastery over every form speaks for his technical ability, and added to his force enhanced speed and strength, this makes him a saber beast by default. Speed, strength and technical skill all play an equal roll in a saber duel. Why Nai chooses to separate Sidious' speed from his saber ability is completely beyond me. The fact that Sidious has such speed and precision to slaughter swordsmasters before they can react, makes him that much more impressive. But I guess to Nai, Sidious having to apply his superior force powers to enhance his physicality during a saber duel, takes away the impressiveness. IDK.

From what I understand, Nai is arguing that Sidious's "technical ability" with a blade is not the equal of Windu or Yoda's, which is the reason Windu was able to defeat Sidious despite not being as powerful as him.

He doesn't believe that Vapaad negated Sidious's power advantage in the metaphysical sense.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
But I'll address your first point. And I repeat again, there is no contradiction. I'm not exactly clueless as to what I read, therefore I don't need to be on your level at understanding literature as a whole to be better at judging who would win in a vs forum. All I need to be better at is judging fighters based on their performances, and/or the circumstance/context surrounding their performance, which I am. I can also be better at applying fighting mechanics in a vs forum based on what I read or see (in this particular thread we're arguing on what we see onscreen). Do you understand now?

Oh really, Sir?
Don't you think, that is a little shortsighted? Probably not. Yet, I am quite aware of the fact, that for almost every fight occuring in the SW universe, there are at least two sources describing it, often contradicting eachother (see virtually all fights in "Revenge of the Sith"😉. Do you take that into consideration, when forming your opinion about a certain fight? Apparently not.

Then there is, of course, those multitudes of sources dealing with characters involved in a versus fight. Do you consider those, when attempting to judge a particular fight? Do you attempt to encorporate those in your analysis, forming a synthesis of "what you see" and what has happened to a character involved before / after? Do you honestly consider the "context" of a fight, when trying to "analyse" it? Do you keep track of the use of certain phrases in the SW source material (e.g. "mastery" regarding lightsaber combat) and acknowledge their established meaning and relative weight. Apparently not.

So...what exactly is your grasp on such issues worth, when you ignore 75 to 90 percent of the input regarding such topics? You claim to "apply fighting mechanics" when attempting to analyse lightsaber fights. I wonder how you do that. Do you encoporate your experience in wielding virtually weightless weapons that cut through everything - or your experience in utilizing a mystical energy field to amp your speed and strength? Did you even consider the possibility, that Sidious was dulling the abilties of his opponents in every lightsaber fight he entered, before I brought it to the table? Do you consider such a "minor detail" important when judging his actual fighting prowess?

Seriously. The only thing you are good at, is being certain. You hold to a secure vision of the world. You're a man with the right answers - that the prerequisite questions were themselves the correct ones goes without saying. You bask in your simple, comforting assertions of clarity, of a black and white world. That's good for you. You can be content with that, but please don't try to argue me out of your blithe ignorance.


BTW, I appreciation your lecturing on swordfighting. lol

Good for you.


Also, you should have re-read my comment on the Sidious vs Maul&Savage fight before you responded to it. You just made a fool of yourself, as I never denied any of the times Sidious used the force (read it again). And lol @ comparing Kenobi's performance to Sidious's. You clearly don't have my grasp of context when it comes to fights, and you'll see why when I respond to all of that. [/B]

Oh. I did read your comment regarding that fight. What was your conclusion again? Oh, yeah:

"Also, lol @ Sidious "using a lot of force use" during his fight with Maul and Savage."

So. Multiple offensive applications of the Force, all - with the exception of his initial force ownage against the duo - decisive for the fight, aren't enough to say, that Sidious used the force quite a lot? Especially in comparison to virtually all other lightsaber fights we have witnessed? 🙄

Sure. He didn't attempt to force rape them instantly, which he was apparently capable of. Still, all of his decisive moves in that confrontation - save for the final deactivation of Maul's blades - were applications of the force or prepared by those.

And regarding Kenobi: He certainly looked worse against the brothers compared to Sidious. Yet, in terms of sheer bladework, he was actually performing with a higher efficacy than the Sith Lord. In fact, he would probably have defeated the duo, hadn't Maul used the Force to remove him from the scene.

In addition:


Sidious having mastery over every form speaks for his technical ability[...]

Actually, that speaks for the inability of the people writing the Visual Guide to a TV Show for children.

But even utilizing suspension of disbelief, the degree of Sidious mastery is to be put into question. Did he "master" Soresu to the same degree like Obi-Wan Kenobi, the "ultimate master" (RotS novel) of the form? Did he "master" Juyo to the same extend that Mace Windu did, who "completed" the aforementioned style with his Vaapad? Did he master Djem So to the extend Anakin, the "finest Djem So wielder Dooku had ever seen" (RotS Novel) did? Was he as proficient with Makashi as Dooku, who spent decades with mastering the style? Or is that phrase rather alluding to a familiarity with the forms, as in knowing their patterns and corresponding philosophy enough to teach them, than to a masterful application of those in context of a lightsaber fight.

Seriously. Such blanket statements aren't worth the paper they are printed on and one virtually needs to ignore all other sources or cherrypick in order to take them serious. Oh...almost forgot whom I was talking to. 🙄

Sidious' technical level is is almost certainly second to only Yoda: he's disarmed and beaten Maul, one of the most dangerous Sith apprentices in history (Episode I Visual Dictionary) and master of Juyo, which requires him to be a high-level master of multiple forms (Fightsaber), who's comfortably beat Qui-Gon Jinn, one of the most skilled Jedi ever produced by the order (The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia), while restraining himself and decades before the events of RotS. When he so chooses, he completely shits on Savage Opress while grinning, he disarms Kit Fisto, one of the most skilled and celebrated swordsmen in the order (Episode III Visual Dictionary) while fending off and soon forcing back Mace Windu, also one of the most skilled Jedi ever produced by the order (Revenge of the Sith), and he manages to fight Yoda as an equal for a good amount, and Yoda is possibly the most skilled Jedi ever up to that point (Fightsaber), the most skilled Jedi in the order (Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter), and with several feats to his name, such as beating Count Dooku, one of the most powerful Jedi ever produced by the order (Revenge of the Sith).

^ To be fair, most of that probably relates to Sidious being Uber Powerful. But I'm not sure how much of it relates to Sidious's technical skill with a blade, which is what Nai is arguing.

He's arguing that Mace Windu defeated Sidious in Lightsaber combat through superior fencing skill, even though Windu is obviously not as powerful as Sidious in the Force.

Originally posted by Nai

And regarding Kenobi: He certainly looked worse against the brothers compared to Sidious. Yet, in terms of sheer bladework, he was actually performing with a higher efficacy than the Sith Lord. In fact, he would probably have defeated the duo, hadn't Maul used the Force to remove him from the scene.

Nai, do you believe Kenobi to be more skilled as a Saber duelist than Maul? If so do you see the difference as a significant one? Would seem a bit strange seen as Maul was a Juyo practitioner, and seemingly completely mastered the form.

Sidious is a master of all lightsaber forms. Trying to pinpoint his exact level of skill next to another character's is probably a futile enterprise without direct narration on the subject, but we can certainly conclude his technical expertise is considerable.

Also not seeing how Sidious can't hang with Windu or Yoda, but I'm sure Nai will elaborate further when he has the time.

I think he elaborated on it enough on the last page, when he pointed out that Sidious was apparently disarmed in under a minute by Yoda and switched to a Force-based contest in which he still only had a 50-50 chance of winning. And for Windu he pointed out that Windu was able to fight him on autopilot, indicating discrepancy in terms of actual skill.

Have some issues with all three of those points.

I'd hoped you would.

Hoped?

You wish to do battle with me or you wish me to battle the German and you observe in malicious content at our struggle?

The latter.

You vs Nai is always fun for how aggressively passive-aggressive you are to each other.

Aggression turns you on, doesn't it? Bet you like it rough, you dirty man.

Originally posted by Nai
Your inability to grasp my point is testament to your proficiency in the analysis and debating business.

Blah blah, been addressed. But I still see some more blah blah from you.

Anyway, what I mean by your ignorance of context/circumstances surrounding fights, well, you'll see when I expose it.

Originally posted by Nai
What an artistically articulated tirade.
But you're still missing the point, which was the difference between self-evaluation in your case and a rating of debating skills through others in mine.

That aside: You do realize, that I have just as many years on in improving my quality as a debater now, than I had five years ago, right?

The only one missing the point here, is you. You were looked up to back then by a bunch of minors, most of whom don't even visit these forums anymore. But a few of them who are still here have matured and the quality of their debating skills have improved dramatically, while yours have not despite the added years.

Back then, you were fully grown and probably already through college or almost through it, while the majority you were debating were still in their early years of high school. Don't brag so much about what they thought of you back then, especially when you had so much years on them.

BTW, all you do is self praise. I mean seriously, how many times have you mentioned your primary language being German? Seems like every single debate. We get it by now, you can debate in a secondary language.

*clap clap*

There's your kudos, now you can stop reminding everyone.

Originally posted by Nai
Since you've never belonged to that particular crowd of people and – as I may add – never will, I'd advise you to stick to your trade, before you seriously hurt yourself.

But I'm better than you at debating a vs match. 😉

And trust me, I won't hurt myself.

Originally posted by Nai
So for Sidious, fighting Yoda on equal ground would be an extremely unfavourable thing, not just because of sacrificing 2/3s of his offensive abilities, but also because Yoda's "usual" hight of attack would be Sidious lower section - at the Jedi Masters maximum reach and power. So having Yoda on the "high part" of the platform is nothing but an advantage for Sidious, in both offense and defense: Neither does he need to aim his strikes down at Yoda, sacrificing speed and strength, nor are Yoda's attacks delivered on the least defensible part of Sidious body.

I notice you didn't mention many of Yoda's main disadvantages while fighting on even ground, like reach and height, and the fact that Yoda uses a shorter lightsaber than most. Going for the legs can be responded to by giving ground or a nice leap, which may leave Yoda open to have a saber sliced through his head. For example, when play fighting with my nephew, I'm able to reach out and touch his head before he is able to touch me, because I can easily give ground and reach out further. Same way with Yoda, his opponents have more reach on top of having longer lightsabers. Furthermore, your point is easily debunked by the fact that Yoda doesn't really rely on foot work during saber duel, but instead relies on acrobats, never staying on the ground for long, and often tries to find higher parts to leap on. In fact, most of his attacks occur while he is in mid-air. So again, Yoda was not at a disadvantage on the platform him and Sidious were fighting on; he had room to do circles around Sidious, and he also had higher parts to rest on while he overpowered Sidious in saber locks, which is something he couldn't do with Dooku, as he didn't have anything to stand on in order to force Dooku's saber down. (This debunks your claim that Dooku did better just because he didn't make the grunts Sidious did. We know for a fact that if he can overpower Sidious in a saber lock, he can most certainly do the same to Dooku with far more ease, considering that Sidious is far stronger than Dooku considering both their performances against Savage)

Originally posted by Nai
On Yoda's part I don't see much advantage there. Sure. He doesn't need to jump as high to place swings on the upper defense of Sidious, but from the perspective of a swordfighter, that already is a nonsensical tactic on Yoda's part, unless attempting to confuse his opponent with the variety of possible points for attack. And even then, he doesn't seem to have much trouble utilizing his artistics against an opponent on equal ground, as seen in his fights against Dooku. In one of those fights, he's even seen alternating the route of his movement while in mid-air.

The only advantage Sidious had on the platform, was not having to defend his lower and middle section as much, and not having to bend over to try to attack Yoda, but that's about it. Though that wasn't the case throughout their entire duel, as it started on even ground, and when they took it to the confined platform, there were times Yoda was fighting on the lower section, but ironically chose to stay on the higher part for the majority of the fight, hmm?

Originally posted by Nai
And this part here is heavily conflicting with what we know about Sidious fighting style. He is a very efficient duellist, capable of manouvering and handling his blade in a very precise fashion, demonstrated in the instance where he ran his blade around Darth Maul's silhuetto in a blurring speed, so close that Maul commented on it, that a twitching of one of his muscles would have resulted in serious injury. That aside, we saw Sidious utilizing confined space to his advantage when confronting the Jedi strike team in his office. Again, I'd say Yoda does suffer far more from confined space, given that he needs wide swings to even out his lack of physical strength / reach and relies heavily upon accrobatic manouvers - far more so than Sidious himself.

None of that was taken away from Yoda in the confined space, as Yoda was constantly doing acrobatic maneuvers around Sidious. And Yoda doesn't need wider swings to even out his lack of strength, he has the force to enhance is physical strength just as Sidious does. Furthermore, where do you get that he was unable to throw wider swings. Stop talking out of your ass lol. Again, Yoda was hardly affected by the confined, certainly not to the extent that Sidious was.

And what I said is not conflicting with what we see from Sidious. We seen Sidious leap from a great distance and slaughter two master swordsman faster than they can react, we see Sidious giving ground and doing an acrobatic maneuvers in order to evade "Ferocious" assaults by Windu. Hell, we see Sidious is more than able to perform acrobats during his battle with the Maul bros, and can seemingly us the force to propel himself both frontwards and backwards (seemingly gliding). These were things taken away from him in a confined platform.

Originally posted by Nai
Taking the stuff above into consideration, I imagine Sidious wouldn't fare better on equal ground, since he will find himself in far less benefitial conditions for himself, while all advantages (aside from the need to perform higher jumps) are on Yoda's side. Yes, there won't be the threat to be pushed over an edge - but there would be the risk to get cornered by a similar assault from Yoda, with the result being a whirlwind with a lightsaber hacking away at your legs. Certainly not desireable.

Well you can imagine all you want, but you're still wrong. 😉

On even ground, there would be a risk of being attacked by Yoda by a similar assault, but it can be responded to by giving ground or leaping away. On the confined platform, there was no way for Sidious to respond to Yoda's ferocious assault other than almost losing his balance and nearly going over edge, due to his lack of space to maneuver in.

Oh, and as for your 2/3 estimation, did you do this quick estimation in your head? 😂

I'll get to the rest later. I'll appreciate if you let me finish before you respond to this post. But if you have a desperate urge to respond to it, then I guess I can't stop you.

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
BTW, all you do is self praise. I mean seriously, how many times have you mentioned your primary language being German? Seems like every single debate. We get it by now, you can debate in a secondary language.

*clap clap*

There's your kudos, now you can stop reminding everyone.

🙁

Can I also have some claps, pliz?

My first language is also not English (not even Germanic language FYI), so maybe like 3x claps? 😉

Clap clap