Exar Kun vs Dooku

Started by Nai27 pages

@Gideon:
Do you think you have created enough white noise now, to make people forget that I just owned you...again? 😉

@Sidious66:

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
I'm not seeing how Kun shrugging off magic attacks means that he can shrug off TK attacks from a TK user of Dooku's caliber, unless he rivals Dooku in TK. Kun can shrug off sorcery because he likely has an answer to sorcery on account of being a gifted sorcerer. Why are we comparing apples to oranges?

Kun can, apparently, shrug off everything without caring much about it. Aleema Keto with her Sith Magic? He apparently walks right through and ragdolls her. Odan-Urr with his Force Sever technique - puts Kun on his ass for some seconds and gets force choked to death by the Sith Lord. Even before Kun is proclaimed Dark Lord, when searching for Ulic, the narrator notes that he walks through a battlefield, without caring, untouched by shrapnel and fire.

So, obviously, his force defense / resistance is rather good. Does that help him against TK? Well. Maybe not. But then: Why even argue that specific case? I really don't see Dooku and Kun duking it out with TK. Dooku, as we have seen in his "wizard battle" against Yoda in AotC, prefers to use force lightning when attacking others, or throwing objects at them. The former shouldn't be much of a problem for Kun. And even assuming Dooku could toss stuff around that Kun couldn't catch - he could simply obliterate it with his amulets anyways.

Vice versa, Kun has used amulet blasts (Nadd), Sith magic (Aleema Keto, Luke Skywalker) and TK (Odan-Urr, Luke's students) in direct confrontation. And, even assuming again, that Dooku is better at telekinesis than Kun, I don't see the PT Sith doing much against Sith magic or Kun's amulet blasts. The former, because all defenses Yoda has taught Luke fail against Kun's sorcery attack in the Jedi Academy Trilogy. The latter, because of the sheer power output of those amulets.


Also, The Jedi Academy Training Manuel states that a dark sider's powers increases when on a dark side nexus, so why wouldn't this be the case with Kun? [/B]

And to what extend?
From what we've seen in the saga so far, the only power nexus that did make a difference, was the Valley of the Jedi. Anything else? Just a mild improvement of abilities, without being a deciding factor. Even on Vjun the Dark Side seemingly wasn't strong enough to turn Dooku into a being capable of defeating Yoda. The same spot - after futher corruption through Darth Vader, didn't help much, when Luke Skywalker and Kam Solusar attacked the facility and pretty much annihilated the Dark Side Elite.
The Nexus below the Jedi Temple didn't seem to turn the Jedi within into powerhouses, neither did Onderon/Isis affect Jedi on their own, despite the fact that Nadd had corrupted those places for several centuries.

So the question is, whether such nexus has to be considered at all when judging the abilities of certain characters. And in this special case, it's pretty clear that:

a) Even if their should have been a boost via the temple (and the narration doesn't say so) the amulet had by far the greater effect on Kun.

b) Even if we consider a boost through the temple as nexus, what would that mean? Would Kun just fire room-sized beams capable of annihilating flesh instead of football-field-size beams capable of obliterating metre thick stone walls? Wonder what kind of difference that would make for this arguement in particular.

Originally posted by Nai
[b]@Gideon:
Do you think you have created enough white noise now, to make people forget that I just owned you...again? 😉[/B]

Apparently the thread itself has forgotten... since I don't see any posts from you that I haven't already addressed... Don't conflate your obsessive fantasies about me with reality. 😉
Damn. Never mind, I see it now.

Response forthcoming.

Haha you ****ed up.

shut up

It's Nai's fault. Like a coward, he chose to post in a part of the thread where I'd least look.

Yeah, that's it.

What part was that? The part with talent and logic in it? Ka-bow-wow!

Originally posted by Nephthys
What part was that? The part with talent and logic in it? Ka-bow-wow!

Why wouldn't I look at my own posts?

Originally posted by Nai
First off, you comparison is flawed, given that all of the Massassi are dark side users, and one should assume that they are capable of mustering at least some force defense.

My comparison would only be flawed if I were suggesting that the Maladians and the Massassi are equal with respect to Force defense; I’m not. My suggestion is that neither group is on par with Dooku.

That Plagueis and Kun can lay waste to comparatively pedestrian enemies does not mean that the same tactics will be successful “against a Sith Lord the caliber of Dooku.”

The comparison is perfectly valid.

Originally posted by Nai
Second thing is: Even if Dooku had some nice force defence (and being capable to deflect lightning, even if its just his own, shows at much), where is his expertise in countering Sith magic attacks? And why would he be capable of defending against the mere amount of power unleashed by those amulets?

Dooku’s expertise in Sith magic is unattested. But is there any reason to believe that natural Force defenses, employed by someone suitably powerful, would be insufficient protection?

Originally posted by Nai
I'm not sure what text you are referring to. The narration in the comics makes pretty clear where the power of that blasts comes from:

It’s the scene in which Kun regains consciousness inside the temple. The text notes tremendous energies are focused therein.

Originally posted by Nai
"Exar Kun feels his rage multiply a thousand times...then a hundred thousand times...What Exar Kun understands is that the dark rage that fills his own heart can be focused in this amulet, unleashing tremendous energies.[...]With every pulse of his anger, the amulet doubles the power of its discharge."

I’m not suggesting that the source of Kun’s abilities is the temple; I’m suggesting the temple would amplify the effects.

It's not at all the same thing.

Originally posted by Nai
I don't see any mentioning of the temple energies used here. And while I'm already at that: I think you give far to much credit to dark side / force nexus spots, considering their actual relevance to the power of individuals acting at such places.

If X performs a Force feat at a place where such energy is known to be magnified and X never again performs the same feat or something comparable elsewhere, I see no reason to conclude that X can duplicate said feat on neutral ground. And that’s pretty much my blanket policy for every character—Palpatine included.

Originally posted by Nai
In overall ability? Certainly not. But summoning Sith magic that is capable of turning people into charred skeletons in an instant is nothing to sneer at.

Of course not. But again, what works against muggles is not guaranteed nor even likely to work against someone on Dooku’s level.

Originally posted by Nai
Since the narrator makes sure of noticing, that Odan-Urr had utilized the technique when fighting the remaining Sith of the Ancient Sith Empire, and Odan-Urr pretty much says the same when teaching Nomi, I would suggest that he did employ that technique successfully in combat. Hell. Why else would he even attempt to do that?

This particular tangent has been addressed with Neph. I think we’ve come to a pretty reasonable conclusion there.

Originally posted by Nai
An assessment that I can't agree with, when it comes to a force contest.

Fair enough.

Originally posted by Nai
Mea culpa.
Originally posted by Nai
My dear Tempest.
First: The basic assumption you are making is already flawed. There is no "title" for the "most powerful and dangerous" Sith Lord. Not a podestal to place a single figure on. In fact, the commentary of LFL officials I've brought to the table multiple times now flat out deny such a clear cut position to exist.

I believe the commentary states that LFL endorses “no hierarchy.” That notion has been soundly debunked. Hierarchies among Force users exist all over canon and at every level.

Originally posted by Nai
Second: Your interpretation is correct insofar, as the "once" suggests that Kun was - without question - the most powerful and dangerous Sith Lord at a time, where the Fact File doesn't make such destinction. Yet, and this is a little problem - the "once" refers to something in the past as does the past-tense. Meaning: If you want to interprete it the way you like, you can't say when Kun lost this title and to whom, without presenting any evidence from the very same source labeling a new person on that supposted "position", with that supposed "title".

I’m not claiming that there was a specific point in time that Kun lost the mantle. But the phrasing does indeed indicate that it was lost. Additionally, why do I need to present evidence from the “very same source”? It’s all C-canon. As long as there aren’t contradictions, there’s absolutely no rule forbidding me from weaving a tapestry together from multiple sources.

With respect to Kun, it’s reasonable to conclude that he was the most powerful Sith Lord at one point (per the Fact File & Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia); at some unknown point, he was in turn surpassed by Vitiate (per The Old Republic Encyclopedia), who was in turn surpassed eventually by Sidious (per a multitude of sources). There’s no contradiction there.

Originally posted by Nai
So, as I see it, this was a correct of a non-ambigous statement in order to create one more in line with the LFL policy on such questions: an ambigious one. Because, you see, that statement with the "once" doesn't just mean, that Kun was not superior to all Sith Lords who came after him. It also opens the possibility that he wasn't superior to the ones who came before, if one suggests that the "once" does refer precisely to the time of his rule.

I find it pretty straightforward, actually. It's just now conforming to existing information about Palpatine and then-previously unknown information about other Sith Lords, Vitiate included.

Dooku being one of the best in orders history and holding his own against Yoda >>> everything Kun has ever done.

During the "era of peace" the Jedi may not have fought Sith, but they had time to practice, expand their knowledge and learn from the past. Besides, GL doesn´t have to know anything about the EU to judge the power levels and combat abilities of the different eras. What he says is more canon than anything the EU authors say and create. Deal with it.

Originally posted by JediMaster97
Dooku being one of the best in orders history and holding his own against Yoda >>> everything Kun has ever done.

Lmao. Nah.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
My comparison would only be flawed if I were suggesting that the Maladians and the Massassi are equal with respect to Force defense; I’m not. My suggestion is that neither group is on par with Dooku.

That Plagueis and Kun can lay waste to comparatively pedestrian enemies does not mean that the same tactics will be successful “against a Sith Lord the caliber of Dooku.”

The comparison is perfectly valid.

The point is, that said "tactics" have been successfully used against Freedon Nadd (spirit), Odan-Urr, Sylvar and Aleema Keto. Or, one could say, whenever Kun points his hand at somebody, they either get tossed around, knocked out or flat out killed - without him breaking a sweat.


Dooku’s expertise in Sith magic is unattested. But is there any reason to believe that natural Force defenses, employed by someone suitably powerful, would be insufficient protection?

We may ask Darth Bane about this particular point. Oh, wait. He's dead. Mainly because his apprentice utilized sorcery on him, that he couldn't exactly block. Does Bane strike you as "suitably powerful"? If yes, then I think we've found an answer.


It’s the scene in which Kun regains consciousness inside the temple. The text notes tremendous energies are focused therein.

Yeah. And there still is no mentioning of Kun utilizing those energies, where each other occassion where that is the cased is spelled out in the text (e.g. Jedi Academy Trilogy). And then, one would still need to ask, to what extend those energies did aid him.


I’m not suggesting that the source of Kun’s abilities is the temple; I’m suggesting the temple would amplify the effects.

It's not at all the same thing.

It is, if you assume, that said amplification was essential to the feat, which, apparently, you do:


If X performs a Force feat at a place where such energy is known to be magnified and X never again performs the same feat or something comparable elsewhere, I see no reason to conclude that X can duplicate said feat on neutral ground. And that’s pretty much my blanket policy for every character—Palpatine included.

Oh. Really? So Sidious is incapable of utilizing most of his demonstrated abilities, when not in close proximity to Byss? 😉

Seriously. One can't just assume that, because some energy swirls around in a certain spot, each force user occupying the space will suddenly turn into some kind of force god, who can't even perform similar (albeit downsized) feats on different occassions. Especially not, when said force user is using compareable methods at other occassions.


Of course not. But again, what works against muggles is not guaranteed nor even likely to work against someone on Dooku’s level.

If its something he's not familiar with? Well. We could ask Mother Talzin how good Dooku's force defense is when confronted with sorcery. Somehow I recall a particular scene with the Count on the ground, crying in pain, while Grievous was commanded to save his ass. What was it again that did something like this to him?


I believe the commentary states that LFL endorses “no hierarchy.” That notion has been soundly debunked. Hierarchies among Force users exist all over canon and at every level.

Do they now, Gideon?
I hate to burst your bubble there, but your personal interpretations of the source material aren't the source material. What we have in there, are - in 95 percent of the cases - characters stating their opinion on other characters. Surely. Their are examples were the gap in terms of skill appears to be so obvious, that one is inclined to say X > Y. But is that spelled out somewhere in the source material in the clear cut way you suggest here? Can't remember a single source where that was the case.


I’m not claiming that there was a specific point in time that Kun lost the mantle. But the phrasing does indeed indicate that it was lost. Additionally, why do I need to present evidence from the “very same source”? It’s all C-canon. As long as there aren’t contradictions, there’s absolutely no rule forbidding me from weaving a tapestry together from multiple sources.

Oh. There absolutely is, the way you want to do it, Gideon. You assume, that there is a "mantle" a "title" to be claimed. Since that is based on a single source, where that title is present, one would need to find the next person who holds the title. In this case, I can make it even easier for my side of the argument: Find me any source that describes another Sith Lord with the words "the most powerful and dangerous". I'm rather sure you won't find it.

So we are back at speculation and, while that is certainly funny, we can sum it up with the following line: If you can't present a Sith Lord who "inherited" the exact title from Kun, it stays with Kun in any discussion where he is put up against another Sith. 🙂


With respect to Kun, it’s reasonable to conclude that he was the most powerful Sith Lord at one point (per the Fact File & Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia); at some unknown point, he was in turn surpassed by Vitiate (per The Old Republic Encyclopedia), who was in turn surpassed eventually by Sidious (per a multitude of sources). There’s no contradiction there.

No, Gideon. That is not reasonable to "conclude". That's a pursueable line of reasoning, and it certainly makes sense from where you stand. But it's not "logical" or "reasonable". It's guessing according to your personal preferences. There is no proof that either Vitiate or Sidious [or Whoyamomprefers] have surpassed Kun in the "powerful and dangerous" category. That you assume this is the case, doesn't make it "true".


I find it pretty straightforward, actually. It's just now conforming to existing information about Palpatine and then-previously unknown information about other Sith Lords, Vitiate included.

Yeah.
Let me check that on a most basic level. Vitiate has absorbed the force energy of 8,000 Sith Lords and an entire planet filled with people. From there, you conclude "Sidious > Vitiate" how exactly? I'd need a bridge to cross that gap in your "logic".

And, of course, I can utilize that kind of speculative reasoning as well. We know, from various TOR codex entries, that Tulak Hord utilized rituals to train the powers of his opponents. We know, that Sadow obviously left the knowledge about a similar ritual behind, given what Kun does to the Massassi with his massive force drain. From there "its reasonable to conclude", that Marka Ragnos, the "most powerful of the most powerful", "the Dark Lord of the Sith" had access to similar knowledge and utilized it through-out his 150 year long rule, and perhabs even before that.
But instead of utilizing usual human beings, he used Massassi. Maybe even fallen opponents like Hord. The force energy of how many beings could he have absorbed that way? Hundreds of Sith Lords? Thousands of Massassi? And then - and here comes the fun part - he transfers that power to Kun and Ulic.

And, gosh, suddenly everything I read makes sense. Of course, being given such power, on top of his own talent and abilities and coupled with that nice amulet and Sadow's knowledge, its only reasonable to conclude that Kun is "the darkest power in the galaxy", which the narrator of the Sith War comics notes, right after Kun kills Odan-Urr. Who cares about Vitiate? And what does Kun do in this particular scene? Ah, yes: "walk away with something that will make him even stronger."

So. He is already the darkest power in a Galaxy hosting Vitiate. And then he becomes even stronger. No surprise then, that the Jedi did find it necessary to field the entire order against the Dark Lord. Who survived even that (albeit in spirit form) and - during his little return - was about to forge himself a new body out of energy drained from Luke's students. Wait. Create himself a new body as good as the old one? Resurecting himself in fully capable flesh. I know that Ragnos was about to do the same with the help of the Disciples of Ragnos in JK:JA. I did also read something similar from Nadd, when he attempts to command Kun to utilize Sadow's knowledge to do the same for him.

And, of course, I know two Sith Lords who failed at that task precisely. The one is being named Vitiate, the other Sidious. So Kun being the most powerful makes much sense. And with his field record of personal butchering and force kicking of a nice couple of people - and that little genocide annihilating the Cron Cluster - the title of "most dangerous" is also not easily argued.

Pardon. You were saying? 😉

You really prefer that to the idea that LFL doesn't want to give us power-charts (which was the exact term by the way) and hence obscures a previously non-ambigious statement? Good god.

@ Nai

Fight the good fight, brother. Also, Spader is pretty awesome in Blacklist.

Originally posted by Nai
The point is, that said "tactics" have been successfully used against Freedon Nadd (spirit), Odan-Urr, Sylvar and Aleema Keto. Or, one could say, whenever Kun points his hand at somebody, they either get tossed around, knocked out or flat out killed - without him breaking a sweat.

Your “point” addresses a question never asked. No one is disputing that Kun’s employment of Sith magic was effective against the people you listed. What’s being discussed is whether the same tactic would give him a decisive advantage over Dooku.

Originally posted by Nai
We may ask Darth Bane about this particular point. Oh, wait. He's dead. Mainly because his apprentice utilized sorcery on him, that he couldn't exactly block. Does Bane strike you as "suitably powerful"? If yes, then I think we've found an answer.

We must have read different books. (Was yours just as bad as mine?) Bane died “mainly” because he initiated an essence transfer and lost the test of wills.

If you’re referring to Zannah’s psychic attacks, Bane endured them.

Zannah was noted to possess immense talent with Sith sorcery; a gift Bane was noted not to share. Where Dooku falls on this spectrum is anyone’s guess—no source to my knowledge ever flatly states he lacks talent in the art.

Originally posted by Nai
Yeah. And there still is no mentioning of Kun utilizing those energies, where each other occassion where that is the cased is spelled out in the text (e.g. Jedi Academy Trilogy). And then, one would still need to ask, to what extend those energies did aid him.

Unimportant. The fact that such focused energies are present when Kun performs his feat, coupled with the fact that Kun never manages to replicate the magnitude of said feat on cosmically neutral ground is sufficient reason enough for me to question whether he could ever do so.

I never bothered guessing to what extent the temple’s energies aided Kun and with good reason—I have no earthly idea. The augmentation could have been negligible, vast, or somewhere in between.

Originally posted by Nai
It is, if you assume, that said amplification was essential to the feat, which, apparently, you do:

No, said amplification may be essential to perform the feat—or at least on that order of magnitude. Whether or not it was isn’t really my place to say.

Originally posted by Nai
Oh. Really? So Sidious is incapable of utilizing most of his demonstrated abilities, when not in close proximity to Byss? 😉

Uh, no? I do not blithely assume Sidious, on neutral ground, can duplicate the feats performed on Byss—unless he is known to perform identical or similar feats on neutral ground.

Originally posted by Nai
Seriously. One can't just assume that, because some energy swirls around in a certain spot, each force user occupying the space will suddenly turn into some kind of force god, who can't even perform similar (albeit downsized) feats on different occassions. Especially not, when said force user is using compareable methods at other occassions.

You’re letting your zeal get the better of you. I very clearly said that this policy only applies if the character has never performed a similar feat on other occasions in other places.

No one’s saying that Kun needs to be on a dark side nexus to utilize his amulets; what’s called into question is whether he could duplicate the excessive magnitude of such blasts on neutral ground when not in the presence of “tremendous” dark side energies being focused by the Massassi temple.

If he has demonstrated comparable destruction with his amulets elsewhere, then the point is moot.

Originally posted by Nai
If its something he's not familiar with? Well. We could ask Mother Talzin how good Dooku's force defense is when confronted with sorcery. Somehow I recall a particular scene with the Count on the ground, crying in pain, while Grievous was commanded to save his ass. What was it again that did something like this to him?

Dooku’s inability to defend against Talzin’s magicks in no way means he will be vulnerable to amulet discharges from Kun.

In fact, Talzin’s ritual rather underscores the unreliability of such things in combat. She can bring Dooku to his knees across the galaxy, but flees from Grievous when he’s in the same room. Not to mention that Dathomir, like Byss or a Massassi temple, is a nexus of mystical energy.

Originally posted by Nai
Do they now, Gideon?
I hate to burst your bubble there, but your personal interpretations of the source material aren't the source material. What we have in there, are - in 95 percent of the cases - characters stating their opinion on other characters. Surely. Their are examples were the gap in terms of skill appears to be so obvious, that one is inclined to say X > Y. But is that spelled out somewhere in the source material in the clear cut way you suggest here? Can't remember a single source where that was the case.

No, the source material is the source material. And power charts have been doled out all over canon and at every level. Not to mention the fact that authorities and creative personnel like George and Dave Filoni have issued them bluntly.

LFL may not present a lengthy and conclusive ranking system covering all eras and characters, but that was never in question.

Originally posted by Nai
Oh. There absolutely is, the way you want to do it, Gideon. You assume, that there is a "mantle" a "title" to be claimed. Since that is based on a single source, where that title is present, one would need to find the next person who holds the title. In this case, I can make it even easier for my side of the argument: Find me any source that describes another Sith Lord with the words "the most powerful and dangerous". I'm rather sure you won't find it.

So we are back at speculation and, while that is certainly funny, we can sum it up with the following line: If you can't present a Sith Lord who "inherited" the exact title from Kun, it stays with Kun in any discussion where he is put up against another Sith. 🙂

The title in question would be “most powerful Sith.” No one is suggesting it’s some sort of formal office held by Sith like “mayor,” “president,” “king.” And it is hardly based on a single source.

Originally posted by Nai
No, Gideon. That is not reasonable to "conclude". That's a pursueable line of reasoning, and it certainly makes sense from where you stand. But it's not "logical" or "reasonable". It's guessing according to your personal preferences. There is no proof that either Vitiate or Sidious [or Whoyamomprefers] have surpassed Kun in the "powerful and dangerous" category. That you assume this is the case, doesn't make it "true".

The proof would be other statements from perfectly canon sources surrounding these two characters.

Originally posted by Nai
Yeah.
Let me check that on a most basic level. Vitiate has absorbed the force energy of 8,000 Sith Lords and an entire planet filled with people. From there, you conclude "Sidious > Vitiate" how exactly? I'd need a bridge to cross that gap in your "logic".

I seem to vividly recall a certain someone very recently lecturing another person on the pitfalls of feat wars. Ironic that said lecturer is now using feat wars to try to labor a point. Is said lecturer schizophrenic, Nai? Does he suffer from spontaneous memory loss? Or is he so desperate to engage me that he will cling to hypocrisy like a life jacket, swept about in my vast, raging sea of awesome?

Originally posted by Nai
And, of course, I can utilize that kind of speculative reasoning as well. We know, from various TOR codex entries, that Tulak Hord utilized rituals to train the powers of his opponents. We know, that Sadow obviously left the knowledge about a similar ritual behind, given what Kun does to the Massassi with his massive force drain. From there "its reasonable to conclude", that Marka Ragnos, the "most powerful of the most powerful", "the Dark Lord of the Sith" had access to similar knowledge and utilized it through-out his 150 year long rule, and perhabs even before that.
But instead of utilizing usual human beings, he used Massassi. Maybe even fallen opponents like Hord. The force energy of how many beings could he have absorbed that way? Hundreds of Sith Lords? Thousands of Massassi? And then - and here comes the fun part - he transfers that power to Kun and Ulic.

And, gosh, suddenly everything I read makes sense. Of course, being given such power, on top of his own talent and abilities and coupled with that nice amulet and Sadow's knowledge, its only reasonable to conclude that Kun is "the darkest power in the galaxy", which the narrator of the Sith War comics notes, right after Kun kills Odan-Urr. Who cares about Vitiate? And what does Kun do in this particular scene? Ah, yes: "walk away with something that will make him even stronger."

So. He is already the darkest power in a Galaxy hosting Vitiate. And then he becomes even stronger. No surprise then, that the Jedi did find it necessary to field the entire order against the Dark Lord. Who survived even that (albeit in spirit form) and - during his little return - was about to forge himself a new body out of energy drained from Luke's students. Wait. Create himself a new body as good as the old one? Resurecting himself in fully capable flesh. I know that Ragnos was about to do the same with the help of the Disciples of Ragnos in JK:JA. I did also read something similar from Nadd, when he attempts to command Kun to utilize Sadow's knowledge to do the same for him.

And, of course, I know two Sith Lords who failed at that task precisely. The one is being named Vitiate, the other Sidious. So Kun being the most powerful makes much sense. And with his field record of personal butchering and force kicking of a nice couple of people - and that little genocide annihilating the Cron Cluster - the title of "most dangerous" is also not easily argued.

Pardon. You were saying? 😉

I was saying that none of the above actually addresses, let alone refutes, my point. 😉

Originally posted by Nai
You really prefer that to the idea that LFL doesn't want to give us power-charts (which was the exact term by the way) and hence obscures a previously non-ambigious statement? Good god.

The problem is that LFL does give us power charts. If they didn’t give us power charts and left it completely open for debate, I’d see your point. But that’s not the case.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
If you’re referring to Zannah’s psychic attacks, Bane endured them.

As I recall, Bane had been specifically preparing for her sorcery though.

I don't remember any special preparation on his part, but I've only read DOE once.

He knows its her specialty (obviously, since he told her it was) and so studied it and prepared for it to be used against him in their eventual duel. I believe he specifically calls this out when she hits him with the mind spell.

Find me any source that describes another Sith Lord with the words "the most powerful and dangerous". I'm rather sure you won't find it.

So we are back at speculation and, while that is certainly funny, we can sum it up with the following line: If you can't present a Sith Lord who "inherited" the exact title from Kun, it stays with Kun in any discussion where he is put up against another Sith


I kinda skimmed your debate with Gideon but this part caught my eye, could you elaborate? Are you saying Kun is the most powerful based on that quote? That you can't logically deduce who became more powerful than Kun unless it's explicitly stated (that can't be it since you always get on Gideon about implicit vs. explicit). Let me play devil's advocate and assume you mean that Kun is the most powerful based on that quote (again, I think your point was any source can be disputed). The obvious rebuttal would be, "Vitiate was written long after Kun's character, as well as more about Ragnos". Secondly, being the "most dangerous" simply implies his fight with the Republic. Ragnos wasn't "dangerous" because he kept the sith away from the Republic, but it doesn't preclude the possibility that he was less powerful than Kun (in fact, the sources we discuss indicate that he was more powerful). And finally, going on quotes alone, Vitiate was described as a "godlike avatar of the dark side". So....

Nai tut-tutted me when I used those quotes seemingly to imply Kun was the most powerful, pointing out exactly as you did that that quote was written before Vitiate eve existed. So, yeah I doubt he's really claiming that.

I have never seen an all encompassing quote in SW.

Originally posted by psmith81992
I have never seen an all encompassing quote in SW.

I'd like to see these power charts Gideon is talking about. Or is he referring to sweeping generalizations from GL and Chee, both masters of EU ignorance and contradiction?