Originally posted by Esau Cairn
If someone is malicious & carries out the desire to cause harm, that implies the use of cunning.
Is Gregor Clegane also cunning?
No, sorry, but you are 100%, completely and entirely wrong here. 👇
Being malicious and carrying out your malicious desires does not make you cunning. Joffrey doesn't do a single cunning thing in the books or show to my recollection.
Little Finger poisoned Joffrey.
Actually, Olenna Tyrell did, he just conspired with her.
Little Finger did not organise the midget troupe to humiliate Tyrion.
Yes, he did. Littlefinger organized the stunt (or rather, convinced Joffrey to do it) so that there would be more circumstantial evidence to legitimize the claim that Tyrion is the one who killed Joffrey.
Now, technically this isn't from the show (I think, I don't remember them mentioning it), so I'll ask: which Joffrey are you referring to? The one from the books or the show? Not that it matters, as I'll elaborate on below.
Joffrey did. Another cunning attempt to be malicious.
Now, let's just pretend that Joffrey was behind hiring those dwarven entertainers. So what? Does it make him cunning? Cunning is defined as being clever in the use of special resources or skills in attaining an end.
You could conceivably argue that hiring dwarves to piss off his midget uncle is a cunning act (though it would be exceedingly stupid to do so, it is plain as day that putting on a midget clown act would piss Tyrion off, one doesn't even need to be mildly clever to see that, Tyrion's sensitivity about his stature is common knowledge), but does that make Joffrey cunning? No, not in the face of the mountains of evidence as well as explicit statements that Joffrey is an incompetent idiot. A single moment of extremely low cunning does not overturn his stupidity in executing Ned, or being easily manipulated by Sansa.