Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Not so much my opinion, I was referring to all the "bad rep" the critics said about Ultron.Also Spader's talent being wasted on a one dimensional cgi character.
How was he one-dimensional? If anything he was convoluted and dense and lacked a villain motivation that had stakes, but he wasn't one-dimensional. If you pay close attention to his rambling dialogue there are some weird gems in there that reveal where he comes from. Maliketh on the other hand was one-dimensional.
Originally posted by Surtur
To be fair the fight was never over with Buffy either. Though I agree it was a great finale. The problem is that with Buffy the series dipped in quality as it got into the later seasons. Angel on the other hand began to pick up, especially once Buffy ended and for the first time all the focus was on Angel and it produced probably the best season.Unfortunately Whedon's behavior kind of got the show cancelled. When it comes to renewing a show that is usually done late in the season. The season finales always air in May and so usually it's around March-May that you find out if it's being picked up for another season. Well when it came to the 6th season Joss didn't want to do that, he was essentially demanding they renew it for a 6th season right as the 5th season was beginning to air. So they chose not to renew it.
Yeah I mostly agree with your assessment. The thing about Buffy's finale was that she empowered women across the whole world to fight, rendering herself less special. The whole premise that she's the chosen one and doesn't want to be came full circle and it was neat, but season 7 was weak af.
The Angel cancellation on the other hand is the executives fault, not Whedon. Whedon was simply trying to get early confirmation of renewal so his crew wouldn't be in limbo wondering if they have jobs or not and could get a head start finding new jobs. If Whedon waited until the beginning of pilot season and Angel was cancelled the Angel crew would get royally fuked like the Firefly crew did. And the stupid exec cancelled Angel because he had another vampire show starting and didn't want two, even though Angel was far better and the other one immediately failed.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
I also found Firefly and Serenity pretty underwhelming. Though I liked the concept and characters, but the stories they were given just ended up quite boring for the most part.Love Buffy and Angel though. And obviously Avengers. Not seen Dollhouse.
I loved Angel the series, but I just hate endings with no endings. So that kind of irritated me.
I get fighting in the Apocalypse was his destiny and all. But I feel after hyping up the Apocalypse and Angel's role in it the entire series, they really should have given us some of it instead of just ending the series as it starts.
Also did Gunn die then? Did the amp Angel got from drinking the blood of the Wolf, Ram and Hart last or was it a one off? Too open ended IMO.
Once again it's totally cool if you didn't get into Firefly/Serenity. To me it's a masterpiece but it never got the chance to become mainstream, so it remains pretty niche I suppose.
And the whole point of Angel is that his fight NEVER ENDS. It started with the end goal of Angel attaining redemption, but that's never going to happen so there's no end goal anymore. It's all about continuing to fight even if there's no victory in sight. That's why the ending is poetic. And yes the comics continue the story and are technically canon, good reads won't spoil anything.