Going by Bruce's feats, God can blow up stars by just pointing fingers at them. Then again, the Continuum's civil war was causing supernovas in a dimension completely separate from itself. Not to mention that an inexperienced Q like Amanda Rogers was capable of destroying the entire galaxy if her powers had gone out of control.
I think the Continuum wins this battle.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
God being all knowing though and truly omnipotent, and Q actually admitted that they were not gods and not truly omnipotent might make a big difference though.
The Q have superior feats, and collectively would be too much for Morweh imo.
Originally posted by Dramatic Gecko
Morgan is shown being able to be anywhere he wants to be instantly. The Enterprise ran away from Q in the first NG episode and he had to chase them.Morgan has speed. Confirmed.
Q was obviously limiting himself, as he does all the time. Also changing the gravitational constant is better than anything Morgan or Bruce did.
Originally posted by Dramatic Gecko
Morgan is shown being able to be anywhere he wants to be instantly. The Enterprise ran away from Q in the first NG episode and he had to chase them.Morgan has speed. Confirmed.
Anyways, the Q are considered the top beings in a universe which already consists of godlike species like the Douwd, Organians, Prophets etc. The Almightyverse on the other hand consists of no super-powered being apart from the Biblical God himself, and if the sole claim to God's omnipotence comes from citing the Bible, then that's a dead end.
Originally posted by Epicurus
Q could also be anywhere anytime he wanted. The Continuum is an access point to any place in the universe iirc. Not to mention the ship ran away at ftl speeds and Q still caught and trapped them in a jiffy.Anyways, the Q are considered the top beings in a universe which already consists of godlike species like the Douwd, Organians, Prophets etc. The Almightyverse on the other hand consists of no super-powered being apart from the Biblical God himself, and if the sole claim to God's omnipotence comes from citing the Bible, then that's a dead end.
👆
Originally posted by Epicurushow is it a dead end? Unlike the real world where the crap in the bible can't be proved, in the movie, there's actual proof that MorganGod was omnipotent... he gave an ordinary human the ability to move the moon and blow up stars.
if the sole claim to God's omnipotence comes from citing the Bible, then that's a dead end.
😐
Originally posted by marwash22
how is it a dead end? Unlike the real world where the crap in the bible can't be proved, in the movie, there's actual proof that MorganGod was omnipotent... he gave an ordinary human the ability to move the moon and blow up stars.😐
Sure, and the Q did the same when he turned Riker into a Q. Not to mention that Riker, unlike Bruce, didn't seem to have the free will limitation either and seemed to do a better job at godhood as opposed to the vain and stupid Bruce. Heck, Q2 was able to strip Q of his powers.
Settle down. i don't even know who Riker is, and i don't give a shit about this thread due to not giving a shit/not knowing shit about Star Trek and it's characters... i think that's who this Q person (or people) is/are.
I was simply rejecting Epicurus' notion of limiting the movie character to what's written in the real world bible. The movie is it's own entity which clearly makes a point of portraying MorganGod as the creator. Putting limits on a character where there are none, based on contradictory statements in a book that is itself contradicted by the actual on screen evidence, is dumb.
for the sake of whoever actually ends up debating this topic, i think Epicurus needs to stop applying the real world bible to a fictional character that has facts to prove his power, instead of faith that suggests it.
Originally posted by marwash22
I was simply rejecting Epicurus' notion of limiting the movie character to what's written in the real world bible. The movie is it's own entity which clearly makes a point of portraying MorganGod as the creator. Putting limits on a character where there are none, based on contradictory statements in a book that is itself contradicted by the actual on screen evidence, is dumb.for the sake of whoever actually ends up debating this topic, i think Epicurus needs to stop applying the real world bible to a fictional character that has facts to prove his power, instead of faith that suggests it.
Calm down.