Manhattan vs Reeve’s Superman vs Thor vs Silver Surfer

Started by focus4chumps25 pages

it's not an opinion. it's a baseless assertion. big difference.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Does it muddle his opinion on the thread victor?

any jackass can flip a coin and pick a winner. if someone picks the correct winner based on horseshit then their argument is still horseshit. do you want logic, reason, and evidence to determine the winner or do you want group-thought circle-jerk "go team go" f@ggotry to determine the winner?

Originally posted by Lestov16
Why does his opinion on magic matter? Does it muddle his opinion on the thread victor?

Nope. In fact, I believe this thread is done. Except for 2 hold-outs, everyone agrees that Dr. Manhattan wins.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
any jackass can flip a coin and pick a winner. if someone picks the correct winner based on horseshit then their argument is still horseshit
You described exactly what you're doing lol

Originally posted by Arachnid1
You described exactly what you're doing lol

what a dramatic twist! and which of my statements concerning doc were horseshit? also I never said doc wins. I said he doesn't lose.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
also I never said doc wins. I said he doesn't lose.

Herpy derpy I sayd dat ferst, herp. dur

I had a cinnamon roll today, however I was not that impressed because it was not from Cinnabon..faceplam

Originally posted by focus4chumps
what a dramatic twist! and which of my statements concerning doc were horseshit? also I never said doc wins. I said he doesn't lose.
Actually, I agree with everything you've said. I thought you were arguing in favor of Epicurus's argument of false constraints. I got you a bit mixed up, and had to check back a page. My apologies.

Except Dr. Manhattan does win. Thats the only thing I disagree with.

Originally posted by Arachnid1

Except Dr. Manhattan does win. Thats the only thing I disagree with.

😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
😆 😆 😆
I'm not sure where you're coming from. You seem to be arguing the same thing these past 4 pages. 😐

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Actually, I agree with everything you've said. I thought you were arguing in favor of Epicurus's argument of false constraints. I got you a bit mixed up, and had to check back a page. My apologies.

no problem.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Except Dr. Manhattan does win.

probably.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
I'm not sure where you're coming from. You seem to be arguing the same thing these past 4 pages. 😐

I just fund this a little funny🙂

"Except Dr. Manhattan does win. Thats the only thing I disagree with."

Originally posted by dadudemon
Herpy derpy I sayd dat ferst, herp. dur
I support the use of that smiley. durup

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
I just fund this a little funny🙂

"Except Dr. Manhattan does win. Thats the only thing I disagree with."

Man, I'm just getting everyone backwards. In that case, *highfive*.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
His consciousness is integrated with any part of the quantum field, which is everywhere. As shown he can exist with or without a body, and his body is just a avatar of what the quantum field produces because it has taken a consciousness and there pretty much does what he or it wants to do.

Everything he did and could do was based of the use of quantum mechanics, Quantum superposition, Quantum tunneling and every other Quantum you could think of. Like his teleporting, that would be a usage and mastery of quantum tunneling effect which is the key to teleportation.

He is shown turning metal into glass, earth into gold, changing and creating elements on a whim. Mastery over pretty much everything. The god label would not have been given to him if he was just a blue hobo with some fancy tricks. Its pretty cool scientifically if you think of it🙂


Nope, his mind is melded with his intrisic field. Intrinsic field is fictional concept made by comic book movie collaborators. It literally has no basis in real life physics.

Was it explicitly stated in the movies that his powers are based purely in quantum physics? Or is this an assumption on your part, based on how others are claiming the same shit, Supra?

Half the stuff he never even performed on screen.😂 Again, confusing powersets with feats. That's what Manhattan-fanboys do. The Silver Surfer on the other hand has actual transmutation feats; curing Doom and resurrecting Sure Storm. Feats which Manhattan didn't even attempt to replicate since all he can do to the human body is blow it up in a blue flash.😂

Originally posted by dadudemon
You're just trolling. You're breaking the MVF Golden Rule by ignoring what was seen on screen. Trollolololololololol!

Says the guy who's so buttmad that he types without using space bars. 😂

Originally posted by Lestov16

Manhattan isn't the thread victor. You could try to argue that he can hope for a stalemate against the Silver Surfer, but no more.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Reported.

Also, everything you said is wrong. Magic. The burden of proof is on your to prove he didn't reform from nothing. 🙂

Ohh...wait...supernatural spirits n'shit. hahahaha


He doesn't need to prove a negative.😂

You need to attend a Debating 101 class in the nearest community college.

Originally posted by Epicurus
He doesn't need to prove a negative.😂

You need to attend a Debating 101 class in the nearest community college.

Holy shit...you...wow.

Have you ever heard of a double negative?* Here is that same sentence reworded without the double negative:

"The burden of proof is on you to prove he reformed from something."

That's probably the most embarrassing thing you've ever posted. You were so sure of yourself that you talked down to another person when you were mistaken from the beginning. That type of arrogance is, imo, the most embarrassing of all.

I feel sorry for you, dude. 🙁 I hope your day gets better.

*Additionally, the "can't prove a negative" is something high school philosophy students believe. When you go to college and take philosophy, logic, and discrete math classes, you find out that "can't prove a negative" is a pretty ignorant statement. It is an often uttered statement in online "debates" and it is groan worthy anytime someone posts it.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Says the guy who's so buttmad that he types without using space bars. 😂

"He's making fun of me by removing the spaces. So I'll pretend he's angry. Yeah. That will show him."

🙂