Originally posted by quanchi112
You just come off as bitter at the world for your failed marriage. Don't see the film you hater. Bruce kinda destroyed you just like your ex wife.Huzzah!!
Oh bro you think you know me so well!
Never been married.
So no, ex wife or failed marriage.
I'm still a father to a son, though.
Kinda happens when you have Herero sex.
Not male anal rape.
Originally posted by Robtard
Exactly, I could maybe see them doing a final scene showcasing the entire roster, as a nod to possible future films.Something like this:
i agree...
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Batman is the best, Clarkie and Diana are just his sidekicks 👆
agreed...
Originally posted by Esau Cairn
1) I think it was CTP who 1st claimed it would be ridiculous to introduce more characters without giving each one an "Origin Back Story."And ever since Keaton donned the Bat costume, I questioned why not use cgi elements for the costume? Dude couldn't even turn his head & his fighting style restricted with such a bulky costume. Hell, I even said (on various message boards) to at least make Bat's cape cgi so it wouldn't look like a useless fashion accessory. I even praised Snyder for breaking away from Nolan's realistic approach & said we finally get to see Batman's abilities closer to the comics BY USING CGI elements in the costume.
2) Crying?
All I've done is question the amount of characters being used/introduced in Infinity Wars. Hell, even some posters questioned calling Cap 3, Civil War by the apparent SMALL number of characters that seem to be involved.3) So basically Infinity Wars Part 1 is now gonna be a collage of origin stories for all the lesser characters.
Wow Marvel's been building Thanos up as the ultimate finale but he'll now be sharing the screen with lesser characters' back stories.I definitely won't be crying as much as your looking forward to mediocrity.
don't have time to quote post so here goes...
but yet you believed the OP.. doesn;t take a genius to read articles and find out truth,...
lol not with some of your posts..
lol and triple lol.... in fact LMMFAO, I hope you know those letters spell, if not i shall tell you... Infinity War, part 1 won;t be that.. Most of the actors contracts end with Infinity War so they will saved for the second part.. Part one will most likely feature Cumberbatch, Boseman, Scarjo, etc. maybe even Stan since he will mostly take over for Evans.. The film is 2 parts for a reason, Part one sees Thanos beating the shit out of the Avengers and the second part will see them rise up and take care of business.. Lol you cry a lot
Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
LMMFAOI hope realize or maybe you didn't but Nolan used some cgi in his bat trilogy.... a ton of cgi in man of steel as well
I think you've completely lost the point of the argument here.
We were discussing the amount of characters in Infinity Wars...whether they would be cgi or real actors & possibly diminishing the storyline with origin stories.
This is a Marvel thread after all.
And yes, I'm fully aware, Nolan used cgi aspects as well.
Originally posted by Esau Cairn
I think you've completely lost the point of the argument here.We were discussing the amount of characters in Infinity Wars...whether they would be cgi or real actors & possibly diminishing the storyline with origin stories.
This is a Marvel thread after all.
You have been derailing the thread with your crying.. shall i send you some kleenex.. hahaha..... You are the one who cannot accept that movies tend to use cgi and yet you cry about it... you are also so gullible, perhaps next time read and find out that the russo's made no mention of actually using 67 characters... so its a Marvel which means what exactly.. I was just using examples but hey that went over your head.. Will you soon cry in the Thor: Ragnarok thread because that is being filmed in Australia...
Originally posted by Esau Cairn And yes, I'm fully aware, Nolan used cgi aspects as well.
Then why cry over another film using cgi then????
My mentioning of multiple cgi characters was to point out that the threat of Thanos may get dulled down with the introduction of multiple characters. Regardless of whether it's a 2 part movie.
My further mentioning of multiple characters, regardless of whether they're cgi or not is in context to CPT stating each character had to have a background origin story, otherwise it would be pointless having them on screen.
And yes, I acknowledge the Russo brothers said they had a choice of 67 characters to choose from, NOT that they were going to use all of them.
I've also stated that the previous 2 Avengers movies relied too heavily on cgi characters in the background (invading aliens & Ultron clones) so it's nothing new to see & is beginning to be a tedious feature.
Now how much clearer can I make my points?
They're not me "crying", they're simply my observations & pondering.
But in the end, I think all your childish responses seem to indicate you're still a bit butthurt from last year regarding your "I know people & you don't" episode.
Originally posted by Esau Cairn
[B]My mentioning of multiple cgi characters was to point out that the threat of Thanos may get dulled down with the introduction of multiple characters. Regardless of whether it's a 2 part movie.
But Thanos isn't going too.. Repeat there is a reason why the film is 2 parts.. Clearly Thanos is too kick the Avengers ass, only to lose when it counts..
Originally posted by Esau Cairn My further mentioning of multiple characters, regardless of whether they're cgi or not is in context to CPT stating each character had to have a background origin story, otherwise it would be pointless having them on screen.
Only they do not NEED to have origins in the film.... Do you not know how to read a comic book? Do you not know how to listen during a film.. Besides it has already been said that going forward Marvel won't be origin stories much.
Originally posted by Esau Cairn And yes, I acknowledge the Russo brothers said they had a choice of 67 characters to choose from, NOT that they were going to use all of them.
Congrats, finally, want a cookie because of it hahaha
Originally posted by Esau Cairn I've also stated that the previous 2 Avengers movies relied too heavily on cgi characters in the background (invading aliens & Ultron clones) so it's nothing new to see & is beginning to be a tedious feature.Now how much clearer can I make my points?
They're not me "crying", they're simply my observations & pondering.But in the end, I think all your childish responses seem to indicate you're still a bit butthurt from last year regarding your "I know people & you don't" episode. [
Movies have cgi in them , not a big deal unless people like you just wanna cry and stupidly nitpick.. Son please, I do know people. I do not care if dummies like you believe me or not. Of course I know you will keep crying and be butthurt over movies being cgi, grow up some... I'm sure you will cry soon in the Thor thread...
"Peter started becoming Spidey because he grew up and idolized Tony. Since Civil War seemingly takes place about 10 years after the original Iron Man and Peter Parker is 15-years-old in the movie, Holland's character would have been only five when Stark became a superhero, and rumors suggest Tony has been keeping tabs on the young genius boy and his special abilities along the way. Parker is said to already be acting as a vigilante when the film begins, and Stark reaches out to him in an attempt to recruit Spidey, offering an "advanced Spider-suit" that serves as a major upgrade to whatever Parker was previously using. Because Peter has looked up to Iron Man for so long, he naturally agrees."
NOOOO! Why does everything always have to be about Iron Man? Now he's a part of Spidey's origin? He has nothing to do with why Spidey became who he is. That sounds absolutely terrible. The only good thing I see there is Spidey getting the Iron Spider suit. It sounds like they're gonna make Spidey play second fiddle to IM,
Hopefully Spidey ditches to Caps side and beats IM senseless in his escape.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/01/15/is-this-how-spider-man-will-make-his-mcu-debut