Ozymandias vs Captain America

Started by Silent Master32 pages
Originally posted by h1a8
I proved why he had to see the bullet. You continue to troll and ignore the evidence I gave without addressing

No. you gave your opinion on why you think he had to see the bullet. you provided no actual proof.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No. you gave your opinion on why you think he had to see the bullet. you provided no actual proof.

You didn't address why it doesn't prove why he had to see the bullet so it still stands.

Originally posted by h1a8
You didn't address why it doesn't prove why he had to see the bullet so it still stands.

It doesn't prove he had to see the bullet because your "evidence"(opinion) didn't disprove the other possibilities. if other possibilities exist, then he didn't "have to" see the bullet.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It doesn't prove he had to see the bullet because your "evidence"(opinion) didn't disprove the other possibilities. if other possibilities exist, then he didn't "have to" see the bullet.

You have to give a possibility (counter example) in order to rebutt my statement. That's how you debate.

Originally posted by h1a8
You have to give a possibility (counter example) in order to rebutt my statement. That's how you debate.

I already have mentioned at least one other possibility in previous debates, hell DDM just reminded you on the other page what it was.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I already have mentioned at least one other possibility in previous debates, hell DDM just reminded you on the other page what it was.

No you haven't. DDM did not give any either.

Originally posted by h1a8
No you haven't. DDM did not give any either.

Proof that h1 is a liar

Originally posted by dadudemon
Or what Silent Master said: predicting the trajectory of the bullet and catching it based off of his ability to see where someone is shooting.
Originally posted by h1a8
A time stamp to the director's cut?
Not sure that would count as canon.
But for the sake of curiosity, post the scene as I don't have the director's cut.

The scene timestamp is to help you find it, not for me to post it. The scene didn't change in the director's cut. But, as you know, the director's cut will have that same scene occurring later than the original theatrical cut.

I don't have access to the director's cut at the moment. You supply the scene to support your position and my position.

When I get access to the director's cut again, I'll post it a week from now. Don't forget, when you watch the movie for that scene:

PYBOTSTGAMSH

Originally posted by dadudemon
The scene timestamp is to help you find it, not for me to post it. The scene didn't change in the director's cut. But, as you know, the director's cut will have that same scene occurring later than the original theatrical cut.

I don't have access to the director's cut at the moment. You supply the scene to support your position and my position.

When I get access to the director's cut again, I'll post it a week from now. Don't forget, when you watch the movie for that scene:

PYBOTSTGAMSH

👆

Originally posted by dadudemon
The scene timestamp is to help you find it, not for me to post it. The scene didn't change in the director's cut. But, as you know, the director's cut will have that same scene occurring later than the original theatrical cut.

I don't have access to the director's cut at the moment. You supply the scene to support your position and my position.

When I get access to the director's cut again, I'll post it a week from now. Don't forget, when you watch the movie for that scene:

PYBOTSTGAMSH

I saw the scene a billion times. I have the film. I saw the scene three times yesterday. Although The director's cut is not canon, I still would like to see what you are talking about.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Proof that h1 is a liar

Predicting the trajectory once seeing the bullet. I already proven he had to see the bullet.

I can't believe that I'm arguing with someone claiming that Ozy did not see the bullet.

First, are you going to apologize for lying?

Originally posted by Silent Master
First, are you going to apologize for lying?

That didnt happened.

I rebutted the last argument proving that Ozy has to see the bullet.
My rebuttal was the last one. Therefore it stands unless someone addresses my proof with a rebuttal.

Originally posted by h1a8
I saw the scene a billion times. I have the film. I saw the scene three times yesterday. Although The director's cut is not canon, I still would like to see what you are talking about.

So...post it.

Like I said:

Originally posted by h1a8
Go watch the seen again. While Ozy doesn't make it very audible, if you turn up the volume, you can hear him making the monkey voice sound a few seconds before the gun is fired. He starts moving before the gun is fired while quietly making the monkey sound.

If you have the director's cut, it is at 2:34:14 on. Turn up the volume. Listen for the 'oooo' sound as he preps to catch the bullet.

PYBOTSTGAMSH

Most of all, please don't forget: PYBOTSTGAMSH

Prove you right or prove me right.

Watch this - all aim prediction, never bullet dodging:

YouTube video

Ozy is the epitome of aim dodging. He's as good as an aim dodger can get. Gun Kata uses aim probability, not actually aim dodging, or else John Preston would be the king.

Originally posted by h1a8
That didnt happened.

This is your second lie and here is the proof.

Originally posted by h1a8
I proved why he had to see the bullet. You continue to troll and ignore the evidence I gave without addressing it.
Originally posted by Silent Master
No. you gave your opinion on why you think he had to see the bullet. you provided no actual proof.
Originally posted by h1a8
You didn't address why it doesn't prove why he had to see the bullet so it still stands.
Originally posted by Silent Master
It doesn't prove he had to see the bullet because your "evidence"(opinion) didn't disprove the other possibilities. if other possibilities exist, then he didn't "have to" see the bullet.
Originally posted by h1a8
You have to give a possibility (counter example) in order to rebutt my statement. That's how you debate.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I already have mentioned at least one other possibility in previous debates, hell DDM just reminded you on the other page what it was.
Originally posted by h1a8
No you haven't. DDM did not give any either.

Proof that h1 is a liar.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Or what Silent Master said: predicting the trajectory of the bullet and catching it based off of his ability to see where someone is shooting.

I really don't understand what Ozy did that makes him so badass

Originally posted by Silent Master
This is your second lie and here is the proof.

Proof that h1 is a liar.

I gave the LAST REBUTTAL. It's on you to refute what I last said, not state that it doesn't disprove your claim.

Originally posted by dadudemon
So...post it.

Like I said:

Most of all, please don't forget: PYBOTSTGAMSH

Prove you right or prove me right.

Watch this - all aim prediction, never bullet dodging:

YouTube video

Ozy is the epitome of aim dodging. He's as good as an aim dodger can get. Gun Kata uses aim probability, not actually aim dodging, or else John Preston would be the king.

There is no monkey sounds. Wtf are you talking about. You said in the director's cut. I don't have that. I have the original version.

1. Ozy was shown to move his hand After the gun fired.
That's a fact.

Originally posted by h1a8
I gave the LAST REBUTTAL. It's on you to refute what I last said, not state that it doesn't disprove your claim.

This is also a lie, you just restated your opinion without offering any proof, that's not a rebuttal. Your lie count is now at 4.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
I really don't understand what Ozy did that makes him so badass

He did several things.
The most impressive thing was
1. Caught a bullet at point blank range, showing that he can see motion far slower than a human and have superhuman level hand speed.

Then here are some other feats.
2. Jumps about 30ft through the air and crush a metal gun.
3. Jumps about 7-10ft vertically.
4. Kicks an adult male off the ground about 15ft through the air.
5. Throws a 200+ lb man throw very durable skyscraper glass, with more than 10ft after the window broke.
6. Slams a man's head through solid marble.

All of those are superhuman level feats.

I dont think you understand what "point-blank" means.