Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Alright, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are trying to be helpful with no other agenda. However, you are repeating a question I have LONG since addressed, which makes it difficult for me to understand why you would make the same assumption.Bran has changed his point more than once, and he even admitted his first conclusion, that all DC antimatter depictions were deadly and therefore stronger than all Marvel antimatter. HE WAS WRONG. This was proven when DC antimatter failed to annihilate Supermans matter. So the notion that BMs antimatter is fundamentally different from the missiles antimatter is totally unsupported.
So what about the first example, Anti Monitor? This where part of your take mirrors mine, which is that different amounts of antimatter will have different effects. When you compared quicksilver to Flash, you compared like elements in different measures- not dissimilar elements. Antimatter is not measured in amperage by the way, but common sense tells us that bigger effects means Antimoniter had access to more of the stuff. For whatever reason, folks on the other side do not want to accept this simple, logical explanation. There is NO support for the notion that the antimatter AM had and the antimatter contained in the missile were fundamentally different. ZERO, NONE.
Now, I hope Bran understands MY point.
Well IIRC Anti matter from the COEI was pretty much causing a domino effect, as soon as anti-matter touched matter, matter became anti-matter, therefore replacing matter space with anti matter space
In the case of COEI you will just need to drop a tiny particle of anti-matter so this whole domino effect will start or that was the impression I got from it, let me check the comic anyway so I can be accurate on this