Originally posted by Lestov16You do realize that in CD2, Mick could have killed those hunters 100 times over, yes? With bloodlust on, he will kill with ease here.
Rambo wins. Dundee is a survivalist. Rambo is a survivalist AND killing machine. What feats has Dundee performed that Rambo can't replicate? Because I can think of plenty for Rambo that Dundee can't.
This all boils down to home field advantage, this is Mick's backyard. Mick wins here.
Move them to a neutral location and Rambo wins.
Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Robtard's logic: Dundee never killed anyone, so he can't kill Rambo here.
That's not it at all, stop trolling.
Pre film we learn: Rambo survived Vietnam while being deep behind enemy lines
Film 1: Rambo takes on a police force and seasoned hunters
Film 2: Rambo takes the VIETCONG in their own jungle and soviet soldiers
Film 3: Russian military which includes Russian special forces
Film 4: Rambo takes out a large Burmese(fixed) military force
Now what feats does Dundee have that put him above those? Cos "he could have killed some hunters" isn't it.
Edit: Should be noted that Rambo successfully used stealth in films 1,2 & 4. Probably 3 too, can't recall for sure though.
Originally posted by Robtard
That's not it at all, stop trolling.Pre film we learn: Rambo survived Vietnam while being deep behind enemy lines
Film 1: Rambo takes on a police force and seasoned hunters
Film 2: Rambo takes the VIETCONG in their own jungle and soviet soldiers
Film 3: Russian military which includes Russian special forces
Film 4: Rambo takes out a large Burmese(fixed) military force
Now what feats does Dundee have that put him above those? Cos "he could have killed some hunters" isn't it.
Edit: Should be noted that Rambo successfully used stealth in films 1,2 & 4. Probably 3 too, can't recall for sure though.
So let's re-write CD2. If Mick had chose to do so, could he have killed every man in the mansion rescue scene? And every man in the Outback hunt?
IF, remember I said IF. And remember Mick is bloodlusted.
Originally posted by RJ 2.0
So let's re-write CD2. If Mick had chose to do so, could he have killed every man in the mansion rescue scene? And every man in the Outback hunt?IF, remember I said IF. And remember Mick is bloodlusted.
Sure, Mick could have killed people with his skills. eg I've no doubt Dundee could have slaughtered that mugger; Rambo could have too, with ease.
Point you're missing: Rambo is a better killer, with better skills and has killed(if Mick had killed) deadlier enemies in various settings.
Spetsnaz kill team > some hunters, as an example. Put Rambo in any potential fighting scene in CR/CD2, he does fine. Put Dundee in the Rambo flicks, he doesn't have the skills more times than not.
Originally posted by RobtardOne thing has nothing to do with another. You sold me to that fact ages ago here. And yet here you are, saying one thing DOES have something to do with another.
Sure, Mick could have killed people with his skills. eg I've no doubt Dundee could have slaughtered that mugger; Rambo could have too, with ease.Point you're missing: Rambo is a better killer, with better skills and has killed(if Mick had killed) deadlier enemies in various settings.
Spetsnaz kill team > some hunters, as an example. Put Rambo in any potential fighting scene in CR/CD2, he does fine. Put Dundee in the Rambo flicks, he doesn't have the skills more times than not.