Originally posted by Dramatic Gecko
That's not what I think at all. I'm betting Rambo could beat the piss out of almost everyone in the outback setting. I'm just saying Dundee will win. Was there any point that Mick where he actually felt challenged by anyone? Just because he's a good bloke don't mean he ain't as deadly as Rambo.
he was never really put up against anyone challenging. screen feats of dundee vs pimp thugs lost in the wilderness hardly puts him over rambo in any way. even in first blood he was wrecking an entire town in a wilderness that was strange to him while all the locals hunting him had intimate knowledge of the terrain.
is this a contest over who is more likeable a guy, or is this over who has proven on screen to be the better hunter-killer?