Kyle Katarn vs Aryn Leneer

Started by FreshestSlice6 pages

It's not a taunt. DE clearly says that Leia unlocked hidden potential that Luke didn know he had. Then all three Skywalkers cut Sidious off from the Dark Side together, after Luke had already cut off Sidious' hand in a duel. You ignoring that is pretty sad.

All three Skywalkers?

Could somebody ****ing elaborate?

Originally posted by Skybreaker
🙄 What absurd immaturity on your part. Especially given that you've addressed everyone here with this extremely obvious tone of condescension, which is apparently OK because you decide to make it somewhat vague and play passive-aggressive with it.

Seriously, I can't help but cringe every time I read any of your drivel because I can't believe that you actually take the time to read over your posts without realizing just how absurd they sound. Favorite part: you love appealing to totally useless qualifying statements such as "Scourge is incredibly skilled with a lightsaber" and then assuming this means he can take on XX arbitrarily strong opponent, without bothering to explain the link between your evidence and your conclusion. It just sounds really, really dumb.


You are a master of taking things out of context. Good job.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
It's not a taunt. DE clearly says that Leia unlocked hidden potential that Luke didn know he had. Then all three Skywalkers cut Sidious off from the Dark Side together, after Luke had already cut off Sidious' hand in a duel. You ignoring that is pretty sad.

You ignored this part:

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
It is possible that Leia empowered Luke with this technique after the Luke disarmed Sidious but issue is that Sidious defeated Luke earlier in single combat so how did Luke found the power to defeat or disarm Sidious in his final confrontation with Sidious? Leia was present in this final confrontation and she may have empowered Luke with Force Harmony technique or perhaps Battle Meditation.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You are a master of taking things out of context. Good job.

Out of context? Well, way to appeal to the vaguest, most stock defense everybody and their mothers have ever used.

The fact of the matter is, you have this annoying habit of taking really qualitative statements such as "so and so was really, really powerful", and then declaring that "really, really powerful or <insert vague descriptor>" means that they can take on <insert arbitrarily powerful foe>. And it never even occurs to you have f*cking stupid this line of argumentation is.

Reported for harassment. 👆

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Reported for harassment. 👆

Yeah, let's pretend that making substantive criticisms of one's arguments in a debate forum constitutes "harassment" now. 🙄

What are you, five? Obviously not someone who has actually experienced real "harassment" before. Or someone who will actually debate the subject matter instead of running at every minor impolite thing anyone says, as though you can't handle some heat over a f*cking internet forum.

Originally posted by Skybreaker
Obviously not someone who has actually experienced real "harassment" before.

I spent three years with the man that could emotionally break you to the point where you would do suicide. You know nothing of me.

OK, people. Let's try to calm it down.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You ignored this part:

You ignored the part where DE said you're wrong, but you'll go on ignoring it because it hurts your argument.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66

I spent three years with the man that could emotionally break you to the point where you would do suicide. You know nothing of me.

If you are talking about who I think you are talking about, I can attest to that...

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I spent three years with the man that could emotionally break you to the point where you would do suicide. You know nothing of me.

And given your obvious willingness to abuse the word to include criticisms of arguments made over a debate forum, you really get no sympathy from me. Debate the subject matter, and quit whining over people being blunt. If someone makes death threats, then feel free to complain.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
You ignored the part where DE said you're wrong, but you'll go on ignoring it because it hurts your argument.

You are not getting my point unfortunately.

Luke versus Sidious in DE # 1 = Sidious wins

Luke versus Sidious in DE # 2 = Luke disarms Sidious (Leia is present)

So what does this tell you? Are Luke and Sidious equals as of DE or that Luke was amped by Leia?

Originally posted by Skybreaker
And given your obvious willingness to abuse the word to include criticisms of arguments made over a debate forum, you really get no sympathy from me. Debate the subject matter, and quit whining over people being blunt. If someone makes death threats, then feel free to complain.

Spoiler:
@Freshest, it's the times like these I wish I could break these ignorant people.
I am sure within a day I could get him to quit these forums, maybe quit debating all together.
Though no punishment is as just as the judgment of God, and I will let his fate rest in His hands.

Wow, feel free to threaten to "break" people, but don't you dare criticize someone of using fallacious logic, or you'll get reported for harassment! 🙄

Your hypocrisy just goes without words.

Originally posted by Skybreaker
Wow, feel free to threaten to "break" people, but don't you dare criticize someone of using fallacious logic, or you'll get reported for harassment! 🙄

Your hypocrisy just goes without words.


Ah okay. Now I see why He brought you here. Interesting. I was expecting someone else though.
I welcome your arrival however, but you won't last, one way or another. I can assure you that.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You are not getting my point unfortunately.

Luke versus Sidious in DE # 1 = Sidious wins

Luke versus Sidious in DE # 2 = Luke disarms Sidious (Leia is present)

So what does this tell you? Are Luke and Sidious equals as of DE or that Luke was amped by Leia?


Who made this argument? No one. The argument was Leia unlocked Luke's potential. You argued that Leia somehow needed to channel the power of two more Skywalkers, one a fetus, to defeat Sidious.

You all are beautiful people. Stay in school and don't do drugs.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Ah okay. Now I see why He brought you here. Interesting. I was expecting someone else though.
I welcome your arrival however, but you won't last, one way or another. I can assure you that.

Wow, make death threats. That's OK, but me criticizing someone's debating style isn't. 🙄

Originally posted by Skybreaker
Wow, make death threats. That's OK, but me criticizing someone's debating style isn't. 🙄

Death threats? What? Where? I believe you have completely and utterly read what I wrote 100% incorrectly.