Originally posted by Skybreaker
Let me summarize my sentiments: there's this weird conception that passive-aggressive insults are not as bad as blunt insults, even when the latter are complimented by substantive discussion, and the former are just given on their own. There's this obsession with semantics that irks me.
How are passive-aggressive insults supposed to be?
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
The fact I had to clarify demonstrates your insecurity.
A non-argument. That you have to clarify demonstrates that you can't write proper sentences.
Embrace the Lord and he will aid you on your struggles, for they seem to be great.
You see, this is an insult. You just phrase it weirdly. This apparently makes it OK in your book. My case in point.
I was once who you are now. I acknowledge what I just said surpasses any insult any could make, though truth can be found in it.
Yeah, here again, you admit that your insults are even worse than mine, but that's OK, because you phrase it really weirdly.
My suspicions are confirmed then. Interesting. :mmm: I will welcome this hard task, but I am not sure I can succeed.
Has the internet ever been graced by more of a self obsessed narcissist than yourself? Like, even suggesting that the reason why I exist is for your self development? 😆