Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Death threats? What? Where? I believe you have completely and utterly read what I wrote 100% incorrectly.
You talk about your god bringing me here and then tell me that I won't be here for long. That was the most semantically accurate interpretation of what you wrote, and I can't be bothered to try to find anything else from what is obviously a foolish attempt on your part to sound poetic.
But seriously, you report someone for harassment over criticizing a member's debating technique in a debate forum, and then proceed to threaten to "break" him, which apparently isn't harassment, because you're one of the most ridiculous hypocrites I've ever seen.
Originally posted by Skybreaker
You talk about your god bringing me here and then tell me that I won't be here for long. That was the most semantically accurate interpretation of what you wrote, and I can't be bothered to try to find anything else from what is obviously a foolish attempt on your part to sound poetic.But seriously, you report someone for harassment over criticizing a member's debating technique in a debate forum, and then proceed to threaten to "break" him, which apparently isn't harassment, because you're one of the most ridiculous hypocrites I've ever seen.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
\ I once again suggest to stop insulting users though, thank you.
Let's pretend criticizing someone's debating style is bad, but threatening to "break" someone isn't, the hypocritical point that you've blatantly ignored your past several posts.
But really, I hope you're just f*cking around here.
Originally posted by Skybreaker
Let's pretend criticizing someone's debating style is bad, but threatening to "break" someone isn't, the hypocritical point that you've blatantly ignored your past several posts.But really, I hope you're just f*cking around here.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I "blatantly ignored" your point because I was hoping you would re-read what I said and realize I directly said I would do the opposite of breaking you, for I have changed from my former self.
"I wish that I could break you, but I won't because I've changed" is hardly any better. It's passive aggressive insulting, implying that the only reason it doesn't happen is because of your alleged enlightenment. Insults don't become more tolerable because you phrase it in convoluted language rather than just being blunt about it.
Originally posted by Skybreaker
"I wish that I could break you, but I won't because I've changed" is hardly any better. It's passive aggressive insulting, implying that the only reason it doesn't happen is because of your alleged enlightenment. Insults don't become more tolerable because you phrase it in convoluted language rather than just being blunt about it.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
You babbled for two pages about how I gave you a "death-threat" yet you quote a post from me that says I "won't."
Don't be silly. I said that on one post which happened to just be a matter of your being bad at using concise language.
Also, you misunderstand on what I refer to when I say "break." The mind is a far more important thing then the body.
You obviously don't realize that the "death threat" comment is obviously separate from the "break" comment, and that you could easily tell this from my saying "oh, death threats now" after pointing to the "break" mention.
I also find it funny that you yourself were apparently a very violent/aggressive individual in real life, but then think yourself qualified to beat on someone else for criticizing someone's debating style over the internet. Like, do you even realize how hypocritical this is?
Originally posted by Skybreaker
Don't be silly. I said that on one post which happened to just be a matter of your being bad at using concise language.You obviously don't realize that the "death threat" comment is obviously separate from the "break" comment, and that you could easily tell this from my saying "oh, death threats now" [b]after
pointing to the "break" mention.I also find it funny that you yourself were apparently a very violent/aggressive individual in real life, but then think yourself qualified to beat on someone else for criticizing someone's debating style over the internet. Like, do you even realize how hypocritical this is? [/B]
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Enlighten me on where the "death threat" was so I can address it
Your reading comprehension is extremely poor:
Don't be silly. I said that on one post which happened to just be a matter of your being bad at using concise language.
It's also not surprising that you don't bother to address your hypocrisy:
I also find it funny that you yourself were apparently a very violent/aggressive individual in real life, but then think yourself qualified to beat on someone else for criticizing someone's debating style over the internet. Like, do you even realize how hypocritical this is?
My reading comprehension on my own work is poor? Or rather you did not view my text as I wanted it to be viewed for you do not welcome the Holy Spirit in your heart.
I didn't bother to respond because clearly you know nothing of me, because you trying to address my hypocrisy made you write a string of sentences that is so opposite of how I am, it's embarrassing.
It is not my right though to call you out on such embarrassment, so I shall not. I'm sure every other member saw it though, and while they are silently laughing down the hall, I will still extend my hand for forgiveness.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
My reading comprehension on my own work is poor? Or rather you did not view my text as I wanted it to be viewed for you do not welcome the Holy Spirit in your heart.
No, it's just your failure in semantics. You talk about why someone brought me here, then welcome my arrival, and then clarify later that you were talking about two entirely different contexts (being brought onto this planet, and arriving on this message board).
Also, quit with the religious preaching. It's rude and overbearing, and quite frankly far closer to "harassment" than criticizing someone's debating style. The latter at least is on topic and substantive.
I didn't bother to respond because clearly you know nothing of me, because you trying to address my hypocrisy made you write a string of sentences that is so opposite of how I am, it's embarrassing.
Yeah, there you go again, speaking in ultra vague language rather than presenting a concise point.
It is not my right though to call you out on such embarrassment, so I shall not. I'm sure every other member saw it though, and while they are silently laughing down the hall, I will still extend my hand for forgiveness.
The passive aggressiveness is absolutely pathetic. You claim that it's not your place to "call me out"...and claim that you shall not, yet that's exactly what you're f*cking doing. I might as well say "it's not my place to say that you are a worthless piece of sh*t, so I won't say it at all, even though you totally are."
No, it's just your failure in semantics. You talk about why someone brought me here, then welcome my arrival, and then clarify later that you were talking about two entirely different contexts (being brought onto this planet, and arriving on this message board).
Also, quit with the religious preaching. It's rude and overbearing, and quite frankly far closer to "harassment" than criticizing someone's debating style. The latter at least is on topic and substantive.
Yeah, there you go again, speaking in ultra vague language rather than presenting a concise point.
The passive aggressiveness is absolutely pathetic. You claim that it's not your place to "call me out"...and claim that you shall not, yet that's exactly what you're f*cking doing. I might as well say "it's not my place to say that you are a worthless piece of sh*t, so I won't say it at all, even though you totally are."