Originally posted by Inhuman
What's going through their heads now, after the whole main cast all got "SKWAD" tattoos during filming?
They obviously bonded and probably thought the film was good, I doubt it not making a billion dollars will change their opinion. Of all the stupid claims that came out of SS to hype the film, this is very meh. It's just a tattoo.
So, when will we finally see a DC Studios? Nearly everything DC has worked on outside of comics and live action tv shows has been good. More than half of what WB has touched of DC has been mediocre or below. Hiring Geoff Johns was a step in the right direction, but it is past time they give DC a studio and get out of the way.
Originally posted by Zack M
Those numbers aren't confirmed. LA times stated the budget was 175 M. It doesn't need to do 800 to break even.
lol you are forgetting that the reshoots cost money.. also will smith ins't cheap either... Affleck didn't do his ten minutes of screentime for free as well
also the article does state that the budget IS AT LEAST $175 million, besides I'd rather believe people that actually know these things...
besides the l.a. times hahahahahahah
Originally posted by -Pr-
Good luck on that. WB don't like to release the reins too much.
They'll have to cave in like they did with Geoff Johns. They're about to release four critically panned movies in a row that Nolan didn't direct in which they had total control over. Do they need to meddle (with Snyder) with Wonder Woman to finally find out they don't have the Midas touch?
Originally posted by BruceSkywalker😂
lol you are forgetting that the reshoots cost money.. also will smith ins't cheap either... Affleck didn't do his ten minutes of screentime for free as wellalso the article does state that the budget [b]IS AT LEAST
$175 million, besides I'd rather believe people that actually know these things...besides the l.a. times hahahahahahah [/B]
Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
lol you are forgetting that the reshoots cost money.. also will smith ins't cheap either... Affleck didn't do his ten minutes of screentime for free as wellalso the article does state that the budget [b]IS AT LEAST
$175 million, besides I'd rather believe people that actually know these things...besides the l.a. times hahahahahahah [/B]
hahahaa, that article came out a few days ago. It doesn't need to earn 800 to break even. Then again, you were wrong about Warcraft and BVS. No surprise there. 😂
Originally posted by -Pr-
i'd say theyre more likely to suspend movies like they did after superman returns and pass the blame to whoever they can.
They'll pass blame while Marvel Studios continues churning out hit after hit? I don't believe they can do that this time. Superman Returns disappointed when X-Men did the same thing, Batman hadn't regained his popularity yet, Spider-man was the only one dominating, and Marvel Studios was no where to be found. Times have changed.
People will ask why they can't do what Marvel is doing and they'll have no choice but to give a befuddled answer. This is the 2nd movie in a row that was reported as being rushed with too much meddling from the studio. The blame will go back to them.
Originally posted by Femi32
They'll pass blame while Marvel Studios continues churning out hit after hit? I don't believe they can do that this time. Superman Returns disappointed when X-Men did the same thing, Batman hadn't regained his popularity yet, Spider-man was the only one dominating, and Marvel Studios was no where to be found. Times have changed.People will ask why they can't do what Marvel is doing and they'll have no choice but to give a befuddled answer. This is the 2nd movie in a row that was reported as being rushed with too much meddling from the studio. The blame will go back to them.
They shouldn't do it, but I wouldn't put it past them. WB is still a very successful studio.