Originally posted by carthage1. The only part of the Kas'im duel that matters is up until the duel blades came out because after that was basicly Kas'im just cheating, so Babe having dispatched him with the force has nothing to do with his lightsaber skill.
Bantha I know you have trouble with reading comprehension, so let me surmise it with my own quote. Who cares if Bane fights "Differently" than Orbalisk Bane, Krayt has superior showings to Bane's so-so unless Bane's "different"fighting style caused him to beat someone superior, it doesn't matterNot how I already delineated in my example the fact you can't seem to get your mind around. Now let me break it down even further for you since you can't seem to understand that even before the orbalisks Bane's dueling ability was inferior to Krayt's:
Let me reiterate that not only is Kas'im featless, but he didn't beat him by virtue of his own skill. He used a nexus amp to dispatch him, can you please tell me what that has to do with his duel? Kas'im likewise has no feats to compare with Cade, Wyyrlok, and Krayt's blitzing of the knights is more impressive than Bane not being killed due to Kas'im's Jar kai advantage. Bane in DoE has no dueling feats to compare either, Zannah has beaten no one of note.
He wasn't beating him they were roughly fightly evenly, until he pulled out his other saber. Who cares Kas'im has no feats that put him above Cade, Wyyrlok, or Krayt's feat of blitzing knights. Also Bane was amped considerably when he fought him, as well as knew his style through constant sparring, Bane has none of those advantages here.
Zannah has no feats that put her above Cade or Krayt as a duelist. Whether or not he was gaining advantage over a duelist who has only beaten a featless half-trained Jedi knight doesn't put her above Krayt. Krayt is faster and more skilled than Zannah
2. Bane was beating Kas'im in the initial fight. Kas'im was in a retreat.
3. Bane being amped and familiar with Kas'ims style don't matter because Kas'im was amped as well and was familiar with Banes style. They both had the same advantages so there for they cross each other out
As for my apparent " comprehensive problems" I understand perfectly what you are trying yo say but you don't understand that none of that matters. What I can't comprehend is why you brought it up in the first place