Originally posted by RobtardLOL. Ok, Robtard, I can argue with your logic. Dude look at the film he had bigger muscles in II. When I have time just for fun and to crush your bubble I am going to post the specs of Stallone for II and IV.
Because you brought it upBody fat and water weight will do that. The pics clearly show that Rocky IV has not only greater muscle definition, but more muscle mass. Take note of the pectorals, deltoids, abdominals, biceps and assorted muscles of the forearms especially
Your list has been countered, all Rocky III had on Rocky IV is Speed and Agility, which makes sense since boxers lose those first as they age over Strength, power, durability and stamina. But 2 out of 6 traits does not make a superior Balboa. Or using maths: 4 > 2
So you're just going to ignore the pics because they prove Rocky IV had bigger and manlier muscles than Rocky II?
Originally posted by Robtard
No, dude, Rocky was at his most muscular (and defined) in Rocky IV. Balboa's like a video game character, visually improving with each level(film) up to film IV.
He doesn't seem to understand the difference between fat and muscle. he thinks that because Rocky weighed more in part II, he must have had larger muscles.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Now that you've proven him wrong about Rocky II having bigger muscles, watch him go back to saying that Rocky IV having bigger muscles doesn't mean he's stronger.Even though muscle size was his argument for Rocky II being stronger.
Originally posted by Kotor3Ha.
I don't even know why we are having this conversation. Bigger muscles does not equate necessarily to greater strength.