roughrider
The artist agrees with the pulling of the cover.
More than agreed, it was his request 🙂
All in all, he's been a class act through this.
-PR-
I already said I had no problem with it not fitting the theme of the book.
You don't, many fans do. Whether or not you personally don't isn't exactly material to the company's decision- I didn't want Hal Jordan back but I understood there was plenty who did.
If that had been all the writer/DC/the people complaining had cared about, I doubt we'd even be having this conversation.it's all the extra shit that gets tagged on to it.
The extra, legitimate complaints that people are tired of being dragged up in out-of-theme ways on their female characters.
Just because people find something sexist and problematic doesn't make their complaints less valid than 'merely' out of theme. Rather, it means they have additional complaints on the subject.
Originally posted by JayDaDon
The problem is that the characters involved change things and add important context. If people are disturbed by the image or the content of Killing Joke they should just say that instead of making it about sexism.
Except, the problem with that is directly tied to sexism. How female heroines tend to be portrayed more victimized than the male ones (and 'victimized' being the key word- shown as-a-victim, rather than just afraid or in peril, which is common).
Additionally.... does it even matter why? A lot of people who followed the book complained. The artist and company then pulled it.
You know, as is their prerogative whenever a company gets early wind that something might not fly.
Like, remember awhile back when DC was rumored to be killing off John Stewart and the writer-to-be of GL quit before his run started? And then they *didn't* kill off John Stewart even though it was their plan, because the reaction of fans of, "That would be horrible, don't do that!" changed their mind?
It's really not much of a different thing. They, as the makers of a creative product, are allowed to change their mind. Sometimes the reason they change their minds is complaints of sexism, and a number of people overreact when people change their mind in response to such calls, but it's as valid to change their mind about as any other thing. Heck, more-so, because it is an issue that is very sensitive to a lot of people, but a lot of people act like because it's something people are sensitive (or because it involves sexism/feminist/what have you), it shouldn't be listened to... which isn't exactly a solid chain of logic.
A very nice quote I bumped into on the subject:
"The more you dilute the meaning of freedom of expression and censorship, the less you'll recognize it when it actually happens."
A company did a preview of a product. Fans gave feedback. In response to feedback, one of the people directly involved in making part of the product asked for things to be changed.
If this wasn't about a female character being victimized and thus is viewed as a feminist complaint, this wouldn't get any backlash to speak of. Because it is, it gets a disproportionate reaction.