Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
new Star Trek show is called Star Trek: Discovery...
Originally posted by -Pr-Looked like an older version of Voyager to me.
The ship is ugly as sin. I know it's based on the old Ralph McQuarrie concepts, but ugh.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Nope. Not a lick of the casm there buddy. [/B]
Then I don't know what to tell you. Enterprises go years between replacements/refits.
Originally posted by Robtard
The reboot was enjoyable I thought and JJ captured some essense of Trek while putting his own spin on it, the sequel was lesser but not a terrible film. This last one though, litttle more than an action flick with a mediocre plot and villain with Trek names attached to it.Edit: Post your thoughts when you see it, curious what you think of it as another lifelong ST watcher.
I'll be seeing it on Wednesday, so I'll see how it goes.
I enjoyed the first one to a reasonable extent. Plot was kind of weak, but there was enough in the movie to be enjoyable.
Into Darkness? Not as much, with a wholly unnecessary villain when Marcus could have been a fine villain by himself.
Originally posted by Robtard
The reboot was enjoyable I thought and JJ captured some essense of Trek while putting his own spin on it, the sequel was lesser but not a terrible film. This last one though, litttle more than an action flick with a mediocre plot and villain with Trek names attached to it.Edit: Post your thoughts when you see it, curious what you think of it as another lifelong ST watcher.
Agreed that Abrams gave Trek films a much needed change in the way they were made (A new direction/portrayal of the classic characters we knew). But that didn't mean to keep making it more and more of an action flick after that. It needed to be more and more Trek with the new direction Abrams had given it IMO.
Originally posted by Robtard
Scuttlebutt is that the cast and JJ wont do another without Yelchin out of respect.
Didn't Abrams/Paramount already confirm there will be a 4th which will bring Chris Pine and Chris Hemsworth together?
Originally posted by Darth ThorD. thor your opinion much like your intelligence is very low and never welcome. Yes, they did confirm a fourth and the answers lie not in the small mind of our vertically challenged friend over here but on the Internet. If the movie performs under expectations this could change in a heartbeat.
Agreed that Abrams gave Trek films a much needed change in the way they were made (A new direction/portrayal of the classic characters we knew). But that didn't mean to keep making it more and more of an action flick after that. It needed to be more and more Trek with the new direction Abrams had given it IMO.Didn't Abrams/Paramount already confirm there will be a 4th which will bring Chris Pine and Chris Hemsworth together?
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Didn't Abrams/Paramount already confirm there will be a 4th which will bring Chris Pine and Chris Hemsworth together?
They did, the rumors are that it won't be happening as planned (cast etc) since the death. But that could have just been an emotional response given in the moment.
There's also rumors that Chekov won't be replaced if the 4th is a go, the character will be written off in some manner.
Originally posted by SurturWell Star Wars already laid out the basic premise of Rogue One well in advance. Trek is in the news prior to Beyond so why not announce it. It is a great idea on paper to bring George Kirk back.
Even ignoring the death I'm not even sure why they'd be giving out plot points about the 4th movie before the 3rd one is even out. Why? Let people digest this latest film first.