Originally posted by MythLord
I don't need Occams Razor when I have the text to support my idea. First of all, Galen did raise his lightsaber by reflex, why would he do that if he wasn't attacked?
Because she was in the middle of an attack sequence where she was attacking him. It's not like she wasn't attacking him prior to making that strike.
By that same logic, why would Galen raise his lightsaber reflexively to that attack if he had already blocked that attack and she didn't make any more attack.
It's obvious that Galen raising his blade was reflexively due to him charging her, which was happening before he blocked her strike, and before she even initiated that strike to begin with considering she was already in an attack sequence.
Originally posted by MythLord
"He backed away, shocked by how close he had come to death and how lucky he had been to defeat her. He had raised his lightsaber [B]by reflex."Second of all, the text notes "practically" threw herself, as in it's almost as if she did such an action, though that was never her intention:
"She had, in the desperation of her final assault, practically thrown herself on the blade. Perhaps she had meant for the two of them to defeat each other at the same time.
Galen's musings could also be interpreted as him assuming Shaak knew she would need to overextend. Conversely, there is no evidence that Galen simply held his lightsaber out before Ti even made an attack that would leave her vulnerable as would be absolutely retarded.
So this interpretation that she legitimately threw herself onto a lightsaber blade that was already raised as answer to an attack that wasn't even executed yet makes no sense whatsoever.[/B]
The semantics on what Shaak Ti did are irrelevant to this discussion, however practically means that what she did was close enough to that action, and Galen wondering if she got impaled intentionally, both mean that she still moved into his attack while she was attacking him.
The fact of the matter that you seem to be so desperately trying to make yourself willfully ignorant of is that Galen wouldn't have been wondering if it was a mutually assured destruction outcome attempt if Shaak's attack succeeding wouldn't have obviously ended with her impaled on his blade.
Originally posted by MythLord
That's all fine and dandy, but I never brought it up.Fair enough on the staggering thing, though.
So after Galen blocked her strike, she moved herself through most of the length of his blade?
Originally posted by MythLord
He would've raised it as she attacked, not before her attack. In which case she couldn't stop herself and her only hope was decapitating him first which she would have done had Galen not used the Force.
If he was raising it as she was attacking, then his blade would be moving to impale her just as her attack was moving to impale his face, which would've still ended in Shaak being impaled.
You trying to say he raised his blade after he blocked her attack still has absolutely no basis, even by your own logic.
You're saying that Galen raising his blade before her strike makes no sense since he wouldn't be acting reflexively to anything she was doing, even though that strike was at the end of an attack sequence where she was already on the offensive and levying strikes against him. He could've been acting reflexively to the attack sequence as a whole, or her moving towards him, or while she was striking at him, but by your own logic him reflexively raising his blade after he already blocked her strike makes no ****ing sense.
You are saying that Shaak Ti got impaled after her strike failed, when the text saying that she moved into his blade in the desperation of her final assault, and when Galen is wondering if she intended for them to both take each other out at the same time, which for his musing to have any logical basis means he either raised his blade prior to or at the same time as he blocked the attack, which means Shaak Ti would've still been impaled on his blade even if the attack succeeded.
You are trying to twist words, use semantics, and aim for far-fetched interpretations of the text to support the narrative that makes Shaak Ti look better, despite the text making it abundantly clear that if Galen hadn't blocked the strike they would've taken each other out, and the reasoning you are using to argue that Galen raising his blade before her strike makes no sense applies even moreso to the notion that Galen raised his blade after he blocked her strike.