Beniboybling
Worst Member
Originally posted by psmith81992
Just because you don't think there was nothing preventing Luke from fulfilling his potential, doesn't mean he fulfilled his potential. You really don't understand how this works. If you can't prove it, move on.
Yes it does, that's how the progression of a Jedi works, they get stronger and stronger until they reach their potential through training, if nothing got in the way of Luke getting stronger and stronger he would have inevitably reached his potential.
Your grasping at straws.
Also, his potential was to be more powerful than the Emperor...
I've disproved that as the case here:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=15188098#post15188098
The burden of proof is now on you.
Originally posted by Nargaroth
Isn't that in contradiction with the Mortis trilogy? I mean, Anakin had the potential to stomp the Son and the Daughter, and reach the Father's level, and the latter should be more powerful than Abeloth, who in turn is >Luke. Yes, Anakin needed a nexus amp, but that's still proof of his potential.
I'd say its a contradiction with Abeloth material, which is overriden by Mortis and George as higher levels of canon.
That or Abeloth > The Father, which is a possibility. I mean she did bathe in the Pool of Knowledge and in the Font of Power...
I mean bear in mind that the Mortis arc came several years after Abeloth. So it's think its as if they were considering Mortis when they were writing her.
Originally posted by Sinious
You said the context is very important. Lucas' point was that Anakin was going to become more powerful than Sidious but Obi-wan ruined it. Yet, there's another force user that could become what Anakin can't be anymore which is being more powerful than Sidious.
And twice as powerful as the Sidious, its not in the same quote, but it is from the same guy and in the exact same contexts. Therefore I feel it applies. He's basically being more explicit on what "being more powerful than Sidious" entails.
However at this point I'm inclined to agree to disagree. New Canon might not even acknowledge it anyway.