Thanos vs Supermans

Originally posted by carver9
Thor has punched through Galactus skull with Mjlonir. Punched through a Celestial head with Mjlonir. Superman hits harder than Thor without Mjlonir but their strength isn't that far off. With the hammer, Thor most Def hits harder than Superman. Doesn't matter anyways since you don't even know of Superman fts to debate the topic, H1.

2. That wasn't a punch. It was a flying ram.

3. My stipulation is Superman "letting loose". Superman is vastly stronger than Thor by feats. He would hit vastly harder under those conditions. Imagine a punch thrown ftl and backed by more than 50 earth weights of force. Superman has one shot killed trans beings when letting loose completely.

4. I been debating Supermans feats for years, even before you were a member on kmc. Where is your mind at?

5. That was a whirling slam on the Celestial. Thor whirled for awhile ( building up speed) before he struck. Anyway Celestial armor isn't that durable. If you disagree then provide feats of blunt force durability.

Originally posted by h1a8
Terrible logic.
1. Thor damaged Galactus helmet and stunned him. It was a cheat shot.
Thor didn't go through his skull. If Thor actually went through his skull then it would show how weak Galactus durability is in comparison to Uru and Odins enchantment.

2. That wasn't a punch. It was a flying ram.

3. My stipulation is Superman "letting loose". Superman is vastly stronger than Thor by feats. He would hit vastly harder under those conditions. Imagine a punch thrown ftl and backed by more than 50 earth weights of force. Superman has one shot killed trans beings when letting loose completely.

4. I been debating Supermans feats for years, even before you were a member on kmc. Where is your mind at?

Gotcha. Thanos endured a hit from Thor who overpowered weight akin to that of a Neutron Star.

What punching ft of Superman are you talking about?

Originally posted by h1a8

3. My stipulation is Superman "letting loose". Superman is vastly stronger than Thor by feats. He would hit vastly harder under those conditions. Imagine a punch thrown ftl and backed by more than 50 earth weights of force. Superman has one shot killed trans beings when letting loose completely.

He is vastly stronger. We have done this before and everytime, every Thor fan has just whined before quitting.

Right on schedule... Next up.. BZ strength off request. How is he vastly stronger again?

Because he actually has feats of strength against class 100 and beyond characters which eclipses Thor's.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Because he actually has feats of strength against class 100 and beyond characters which eclipses Thor's.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Doesn't mean he's vastly stronger. Thor has strength feats vs class 100's and beyond too. I don't get your statement.

Thor doesn't goes around overpowering several class 100 characters all at once.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Not like Superman, no.

Thor doesn't goes around overpowering several class 100 characters all at once.

Still don't understand this "vastly stronger" notion though.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
So Superman regularly goes around overpowering class 100's?
That's news to me.

Still don't understand this "vastly stronger" notion though.

When Thor can break bones of class 100 characters over indestructible bracers just by squeezing, call me.

Those are just for starters.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yes, he does.

When Thor can break bones of class 100 characters over indestructible bracers just by squeezing, call me.

Those are just for starters.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
I guess that's impressive. He carves uru with his bare hands.

When Thor can punch holes in heralds with his bare hands, call me.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Is that supposed to be impressive? What durability feats raw Uru without enchantments has?

When Thor can punch holes in heralds with his bare hands, call me.

Thor crushed into dust Loki's uru manacles. They were supposedly even better than his previous uru chains that Odin himself deemed unshatterable...

🙁

And speaking of enchanted, Jane Foster granted with the power of Thor ripped open a vibranium door which had adamantium plating.. The door was also magically sealed.

Originally posted by h1a8
Well if you go off that one showing then Thor did "affect" Thanos. But yes, it would have taken several more hits like that to put him down. Superman is far stronger than Thor and can hit harder (when letting loose). Superman is also vastly faster.

Affect is mostly used as a verb and effect as a noun. You are incorrectly using it.

I thought nu52 Diana's bracers weren't as badass as before?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Err...

Thor crushed into dust Loki's uru manacles. They were supposedly even better than his previous uru chains that Odin himself deemed unshatterable...

🙁

And speaking of enchanted, Jane Foster granted with the power of Thor ripped open a vibranium door which had adamantium plating.. The door was also magically sealed.

It doesn't matter what you say, Abby will discount it.

Originally posted by carver9
Gotcha. Thanos endured a hit from Thor who overpowered weight akin to that of a Neutron Star.

What punching ft of Superman are you talking about?

Superman resisted the pull of a black hole. Which is vastly stronger.

I didn't mention a punching feat. A punch is really pushing force. Superman has pushed with forces above 50 earth weights and is able to move ftl. Thus he has the ability to punch very hard.

So you agree with equating what Thor did in one comic as the same force he did in another? I don't have a problem with it. Just wondered if you were serious or just baiting.

Originally posted by carver9
Gotcha. Thanos endured a hit from Thor who overpowered weight akin to that of a Neutron Star.

What punching ft of Superman are you talking about?

No comment from the Superfriends?

Originally posted by h1a8
Terrible logic.
1. Thor damaged Galactus helmet and stunned him. It was a cheat shot.
Thor didn't go through his skull. If Thor actually went through his skull then it would show how weak Galactus durability is in comparison to Uru and Odins enchantment (not Thors strength).

2. That wasn't a punch. It was a flying ram.

3. My stipulation is Superman "letting loose". Superman is vastly stronger than Thor by feats. He would hit vastly harder under those conditions. Imagine a punch thrown ftl and backed by more than 50 earth weights of force. Superman has one shot killed trans beings when letting loose completely.

4. I been debating Supermans feats for years, even before you were a member on kmc. Where is your mind at?

5. That was a whirling slam on the Celestial. Thor whirled for awhile ( building up speed) before he struck. Anyway Celestial armor isn't that durable. If you disagree then provide feats of blunt force durability.

Are you ****ing joking with this bowl of excrement? You can cheap shot Galactus?

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Thor letting loose amping with lightining hits harder than Superman. His combat Speed isn't something to worry Thanos